1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of factitious foods and prey on the oviposition of the predatory mites Gaeolaelaps aculeifer and Stratiolaelaps scimitus (Acari: Laelapidae).

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The soil-dwelling predatory mites Gaeolaelaps aculeifer and Stratiolaelaps scimitus (Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) are important biocontrol agents of several pests (Astigmata, Thysanoptera, Diptera). There is little information regarding the use of factitious foods that potentially improve their mass rearing and population development once released in the field. Here we tested the suitability of several types of factitious food and prey for G. aculeifer and S. scimitus. Factitious foods included eggs of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), hydrated encapsulated cysts of the brine shrimp Artemia sp. (Anostraca: Artemiidae), two species of saprophytic nematodes (Panagrellus redivivus and Panagrellus sp.) (Nematoda: Panagrolaimidae) and pollen of cattail Typha angustifolia (Poales: Typhaceae). Parameters tested were oviposition over a 3-day period compared with controls provided with either second instars of the thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) or a mix of instars of the commercially used prey mite Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Astigmatina: Acaridae) or the absence of food. Compared to the standard prey mite T. putrescentiae, G. aculeifer showed elevated oviposition when fed thrips larvae, E. kuehniella eggs, Artemia sp. cysts or the saprophytic P. redivivus. Oviposition by S. scimitus was high when provided with thrips larvae and P. redivivus, but not significantly different from oviposition on T. putrescentiae. Oviposition for both predatory mite species was very low or zero when provided with T. angustifolia pollen. Finally, G. aculeifer consumed significantly more thrips larvae than S. scimitus. The implication of these results for the mass-rearing of G. aculeifer and S. scimitus are discussed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Exp. Appl. Acarol.
          Experimental & applied acarology
          Springer Nature
          1572-9702
          0168-8162
          Sep 2016
          : 70
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] R&D Department, Biobest Belgium N.V., Ilse Velden 18, 2260, Westerlo, Belgium. crinacam@hotmail.com.
          [2 ] Institut Agroforestal Mediterrani (IAM), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de vera 14, 46022, València, Spain. crinacam@hotmail.com.
          [3 ] R&D Department, Biobest Belgium N.V., Ilse Velden 18, 2260, Westerlo, Belgium.
          [4 ] Institut Agroforestal Mediterrani (IAM), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de vera 14, 46022, València, Spain.
          Article
          10.1007/s10493-016-0061-2
          10.1007/s10493-016-0061-2
          27388446
          48d17b1d-55e9-4a69-8978-14a520c3de36
          History

          Nematodes,Soil predatory mites,Artemia cysts,Biological control,Ephestia kuehniella,Frankliniella occidentalis

          Comments

          Comment on this article