4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: management of acute and chronic pain

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The management of acute and chronic pain for individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD) is a clinical challenge. This reflects the paucity of clinical SCD pain research and limited understanding of the complex biological differences between acute and chronic pain. These issues collectively create barriers to effective, targeted interventions. Optimal pain management requires interdisciplinary care.

          Objective:

          These evidence-based guidelines developed by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in pain management decisions for children and adults with SCD.

          Methods:

          ASH formed a multidisciplinary panel, including 2 patient representatives, that was thoroughly vetted to minimize bias from conflicts of interest. The Mayo Evidence-Based Practice Research Program supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic reviews. Clinical questions and outcomes were prioritized according to importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE evidence-to-decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

          Results:

          The panel reached consensus on 18 recommendations specific to acute and chronic pain. The recommendations reflect a broad pain management approach, encompassing pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions and analgesic delivery.

          Conclusions:

          Because of low-certainty evidence and closely balanced benefits and harms, most recommendations are conditional. Patient preferences should drive clinical decisions. Policymaking, including that by payers, will require substantial debate and input from stakeholders. Randomized controlled trials and comparative-effectiveness studies are needed for chronic opioid therapy, nonopioid therapies, and nonpharmacological interventions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Blood Adv
          Blood Adv
          bloodoa
          Blood Adv
          Blood Advances
          Blood Advances
          American Society of Hematology (Washington, DC )
          2473-9529
          2473-9537
          23 June 2020
          19 June 2020
          19 June 2020
          : 4
          : 12
          : 2656-2701
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Section of Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI;
          [2 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD;
          [3 ]Center for Innovation in Pediatric Practice, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH;
          [4 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL;
          [5 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY;
          [6 ]Department of Anesthesiology and
          [7 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC;
          [8 ]Center for Blood Disorders, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA;
          [9 ]Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Research Program, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN;
          [10 ]Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;
          [11 ]Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, and
          [12 ]Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC;
          [13 ]Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI;
          [14 ]Division of Pain and Palliative Medicine, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Hartford, CT; and
          [15 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
          Author information
          https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7511-916X
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-1457
          https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0850-4337
          Article
          PMC7322963 PMC7322963 7322963 2020/ADV2020001851C
          10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001851
          7322963
          32559294
          48b304f9-a386-4052-9830-95cbc611ecdc
          © 2020 by The American Society of Hematology
          History
          : 10 March 2020
          : 09 May 2020
          Page count
          Pages: 46
          Categories
          28
          8
          Clinical Guidelines
          Custom metadata
          free

          Comments

          Comment on this article