0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS): Real‐world data on outcomes and prognostic factors

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 1 , 10 , 3 , 4 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 16 , 1 , 3 , 10 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 3 , 4 , 14 , 21 , 6 , 22 , 23 , 24
      American Journal of Hematology
      John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is a recognized clinical entity. Literature regarding treatment and its outcomes in MGRS is sparse due to the rarity and misdiagnosis of MGRS. We retrospectively analyzed 280 adults with an MGRS diagnosis from 2003 to 2020 across 19 clinical centers from 12 countries. All cases required renal biopsy for the pathological diagnosis of MGRS. Amyloidosis‐related to MGRS (MGRS‐A) was present in 180 patients; nonamyloidosis MGRS (MGRS‐NA), including a broad spectrum of renal pathologies, was diagnosed in 100 patients. The median overall survival in the studied cohort was 121.0 months (95% CI: 105.0–121.0). Patients with MGRS‐A had a shorter overall survival than patients with MGRS‐NA (HR = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.25–0.69; p = 0.0007). Both hematologic and renal responses were associated with longer survival. Achievement of ≥VGPR was generally predictive of a renal response (OR = 8.03 95%CI: 4.04–115.96; p < 0.0001), one‐fourth of patients with ≥VGPR were renal nonresponders. In MGRS‐A, factors associated with poor prognosis included elevated levels of creatinine, beta‐2‐microglobulin, and hemodialysis at diagnosis. In MGRS‐NA, only age >65 years was associated with increased risk of death. Treatments provided similar hematologic response rates in both types of MGRS. Autologous stem cell transplantation led to better response than other treatments. This multicenter and international effort is currently the largest report on MGRS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.

          This International Myeloma Working Group consensus updates the disease definition of multiple myeloma to include validated biomarkers in addition to existing requirements of attributable CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions). These changes are based on the identification of biomarkers associated with near inevitable development of CRAB features in patients who would otherwise be regarded as having smouldering multiple myeloma. A delay in application of the label of multiple myeloma and postponement of therapy could be detrimental to these patients. In addition to this change, we clarify and update the underlying laboratory and radiographic variables that fulfil the criteria for the presence of myeloma-defining CRAB features, and the histological and monoclonal protein requirements for the disease diagnosis. Finally, we provide specific metrics that new biomarkers should meet for inclusion in the disease definition. The International Myeloma Working Group recommends the implementation of these criteria in routine practice and in future clinical trials, and recommends that future studies analyse any differences in outcome that might occur as a result of the new disease definition.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma.

            Treatment of multiple myeloma has substantially changed over the past decade with the introduction of several classes of new effective drugs that have greatly improved the rates and depth of response. Response criteria in multiple myeloma were developed to use serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins and bone marrow assessment (which is relatively insensitive). Given the high rates of complete response seen in patients with multiple myeloma with new treatment approaches, new response categories need to be defined that can identify responses that are deeper than those conventionally defined as complete response. Recent attempts have focused on the identification of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow using flow cytometry or gene sequencing. Furthermore, sensitive imaging techniques can be used to detect the presence of residual disease outside of the bone marrow. Combining these new methods, the International Myeloma Working Group has defined new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based absence of extramedullary disease, to allow uniform reporting within and outside clinical trials. In this Review, we clarify several aspects of disease response assessment, along with endpoints for clinical trials, and highlight future directions for disease response assessments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Rituximab or Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                gozzetti@unisi.it
                Journal
                Am J Hematol
                Am J Hematol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8652
                AJH
                American Journal of Hematology
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0361-8609
                1096-8652
                20 April 2022
                July 2022
                : 97
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/ajh.v97.7 )
                : 877-884
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Hematology, Department of Medical Science, Surgery and Neuroscience University of Siena Siena Italy
                [ 2 ] Nephrology Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese Siena Italy
                [ 3 ] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di Bologna Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli” Bologna Italy
                [ 4 ] Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica Diagnostica e Sperimentale Università di Bologna Bologna Italy
                [ 5 ] Department of Nephrology Moscow City Hospital named after S.P. Botkin Moscow Russian Federation
                [ 6 ] Department of Hematology, Fundeni Clinical Institute University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila" Bucharest Romania
                [ 7 ] Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
                [ 8 ] Department of Hemato‐Oncology University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
                [ 9 ] Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
                [ 10 ] Department of Hematology Hospital del Salvador Santiago Chile
                [ 11 ] Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical Center University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
                [ 12 ] Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel and Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
                [ 13 ] Departament od Hematology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland
                [ 14 ] Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
                [ 15 ] Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland
                [ 16 ] Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL) University Hospital of Salamanca Salamanca Spain
                [ 17 ] Department of Medicine Division of Nephrology, Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
                [ 18 ] Hematology Unit, Department of Onco‐Hematology Cosenza Italy
                [ 19 ] Department of Hematology Complejo Asistencial de Avila Avila Spain
                [ 20 ] The John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine Hackensack New Jersey USA
                [ 21 ] Federal University of Bahia University Hospital, Rede D'or Oncology Sao Paolo Brazil
                [ 22 ] Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation St. John of Dukla Oncology Center of Lublin Land Lublin Poland
                [ 23 ] Department of Hematology, Medical Faculty University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn Olsztyn Poland
                [ 24 ] Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Center, Department of Hematology Jagiellonian University Medical College, Faculty of Medicine Cracow Poland
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Alessandro Gozzetti, Director of Multiple Myeloma Program Department of Medical Science, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena; Viale Bracci 16, Siena 53100, Italy.

                Email: gozzetti@ 123456unisi.it

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-6891
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8663-444X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5626-1750
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-8696
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3538-3913
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-7822
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5185-2073
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9796-8365
                Article
                AJH26566
                10.1002/ajh.26566
                9324084
                35389534
                489e4995-790f-4008-a9b5-b792b57052d8
                © 2022 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 March 2022
                : 19 January 2022
                : 01 April 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 8, Words: 5426
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:26.07.2022

                Hematology
                Hematology

                Comments

                Comment on this article