37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mental health professionals' use of the ICD-11 classification of impulse control disorders and behavioral addictions: An international field study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and aims

          The ICD-11 chapter on mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders contains new controversial diagnoses including compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD), intermittent explosive disorder (IED) and gaming disorder. Using a vignette-based methodology, this field study examined the ability of mental health professionals (MHPs) to apply the new ICD-11 diagnostic requirements for impulse control disorders, which include CSBD and IED, and disorders due to addictive behaviors, which include gaming disorder, compared to the previous ICD-10 guidelines.

          Methods

          Across eleven comparisons, members of the WHO's Global Clinical Practice Network ( N = 1,090) evaluated standardized case descriptions that were designed to test key differences between the diagnostic guidelines of ICD-11 and ICD-10.

          Results

          The ICD-11 outperformed the ICD-10 in the accuracy of diagnosing impulse control disorders and behavioral addictions in most comparisons, while the ICD-10 was not superior in any. The superiority of the ICD-11 was particularly clear where new diagnoses had been added to the classification system or major revisions had been made. However, the ICD-11 outperformed the ICD-10 only in a minority of comparisons in which mental health professionals were asked to evaluate cases with non-pathological high involvement in rewarding behaviors.

          Discussion and Conclusions

          Overall, the present study indicates that the ICD-11 diagnostic requirements represent an improvement over the ICD-10 guidelines. However, additional efforts, such as training programs for MHPs and possible refinements of diagnostic guidance, are needed to avoid over-diagnosis of people who are highly engaged in a repetitive and rewarding behavior but below the threshold for a disorder.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

          Gaming disorder was included in the latest revision of the International Classification of Diseases (11th ed.). Worldwide, prevalence estimates of gaming disorder are considerably heterogeneous and often appear to be exceedingly high. However, few studies have examined the methodological, cultural and/or demographic factors that might explain this phenomenon. This review employed meta-analytic techniques to compute the worldwide-pooled prevalence of gaming disorder and evaluate the potential contributing factors for varied prevalence estimates. Prevalence estimates were extracted from 53 studies conducted between 2009 and 2019, which included 226,247 participants across 17 different countries. Study findings were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model. Subgroup and moderator analyses examined potential sources of heterogeneity, including assessment tool and cut-off, participant age and gender, sample size and type, study region, and year of data collection. The worldwide prevalence of gaming disorder was 3.05% (confidence interval: [2.38, 3.91]); this figure was adjusted to 1.96% [0.19, 17.12] when considering only studies that met more stringent sampling criteria (e.g. stratified random sampling). However, these estimates were associated with significant variability. The choice of screening tool accounted for 77% of the variance, with the Lemmens Internet gaming disorder-9, Gaming Addiction Identification Test and Problematic Videogame Playing scales associated with the highest estimates. Adolescent samples, lower cut-off scores and smaller sample size were significant predictors of higher prevalence. Gaming disorder rates were approximately 2.5:1 in favor of males compared to females. The worldwide prevalence of gaming disorder appears to be comparable to obsessive-compulsive disorder and some substance-related addictions, but lower than compulsive buying and higher than problem gambling. Gaming disorder prevalence rates appear to be inflated by methodological characteristics, particularly measurement and sampling issues.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Scholars’ open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal

            Concerns about problematic gaming behaviors deserve our full attention. However, we claim that it is far from clear that these problems can or should be attributed to a new disorder. The empirical basis for a Gaming Disorder proposal, such as in the new ICD-11, suffers from fundamental issues. Our main concerns are the low quality of the research base, the fact that the current operationalization leans too heavily on substance use and gambling criteria, and the lack of consensus on symptomatology and assessment of problematic gaming. The act of formalizing this disorder, even as a proposal, has negative medical, scientific, public-health, societal, and human rights fallout that should be considered. Of particular concern are moral panics around the harm of video gaming. They might result in premature application of diagnosis in the medical community and the treatment of abundant false-positive cases, especially for children and adolescents. Second, research will be locked into a confirmatory approach, rather than an exploration of the boundaries of normal versus pathological. Third, the healthy majority of gamers will be affected negatively. We expect that the premature inclusion of Gaming Disorder as a diagnosis in ICD-11 will cause significant stigma to the millions of children who play video games as a part of a normal, healthy life. At this point, suggesting formal diagnoses and categories is premature: the ICD-11 proposal for Gaming Disorder should be removed to avoid a waste of public health resources as well as to avoid causing harm to healthy video gamers around the world.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders

              Following approval of the ICD-11 by the World Health Assembly in May 2019, World Health Organization (WHO) member states will transition from the ICD-10 to the ICD-11, with reporting of health statistics based on the new system to begin on January 1, 2022. The WHO Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse will publish Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines (CDDG) for ICD-11 Mental, Behavioural and Neurodevelopmental Disorders following ICD-11's approval. The development of the ICD-11 CDDG over the past decade, based on the principles of clinical utility and global applicability, has been the most broadly international, multilingual, multidisciplinary and participative revision process ever implemented for a classification of mental disorders. Innovations in the ICD-11 include the provision of consistent and systematically characterized information, the adoption of a lifespan approach, and culture-related guidance for each disorder. Dimensional approaches have been incorporated into the classification, particularly for personality disorders and primary psychotic disorders, in ways that are consistent with current evidence, are more compatible with recovery-based approaches, eliminate artificial comorbidity, and more effectively capture changes over time. Here we describe major changes to the structure of the ICD-11 classification of mental disorders as compared to the ICD-10, and the development of two new ICD-11 chapters relevant to mental health practice. We illustrate a set of new categories that have been added to the ICD-11 and present the rationale for their inclusion. Finally, we provide a description of the important changes that have been made in each ICD-11 disorder grouping. This information is intended to be useful for both clinicians and researchers in orienting themselves to the ICD-11 and in preparing for implementation in their own professional contexts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Behav Addict
                J Behav Addict
                JBA
                Journal of Behavioral Addictions
                Akadémiai Kiadó (Budapest )
                2062-5871
                2063-5303
                12 January 2024
                March 2024
                : 13
                : 1
                : 276-292
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Forensic Psychiatry and Sex Research, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen , Essen, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, VA, USA
                [3 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town , South Africa
                [4 ]South African Medical Research Council Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders , Cape Town, South Africa
                [5 ]Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons , New York, NY, USA
                [6 ]Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económica , Mexico City, Mexico
                [7 ]Institute for Sex Research, Sexual Medicine and Forensic Psychiatriy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf , Hamburg, Germany
                [8 ]Global Mental Health Research Center, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz , Mexico City, Mexico
                [9 ]Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology , Tokyo, Japan
                [10 ]Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [11 ]Quantify Research , Stockholm, Sweden
                [12 ]Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne , Switzerland
                [13 ]Centre for Excessive Gambling, Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) , Lausanne, Switzerland
                [14 ]Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago , Chicago, IL, USA
                [15 ]Department of Psychology, University of Nevada , Las Vegas, NV, USA
                [16 ]Department of Psychiatry, SA MRC Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders, University of Stellenbosch , South Africa
                [17 ]Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA
                [18 ]Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA
                [19 ]Department of Neuroscience, Yale University , New Haven, CT, USA
                [20 ]Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling , Wethersfield, CT, USA
                [21 ]Connecticut Mental Health Center , New Haven, CT, USA
                [22 ]Wu Tsai Institute, Yale University , New Haven, CT, USA
                [23 ]Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center , New York, NY, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. E-mail: johannes.fuss@ 123456uni-due.de
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0445-5021
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1437-5810
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7218-7810
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-6194
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0404-9480
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6323-1354
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6572-4785
                Article
                10.1556/2006.2023.00083
                10988394
                38217688
                48824186-fad3-4cb3-a0bf-480e70ad7762
                © 2023 The Author(s)

                Open Access statement. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the CC License is provided, and changes – if any – are indicated.

                History
                : 06 October 2023
                : 22 December 2023
                : 22 December 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 49, Pages: 00
                Categories
                Article

                compulsive sexual behavior disorder,gambling disorder,gaming disorder,pyromania,kleptomania,intermittent explosive disorder

                Comments

                Comment on this article