Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and validation of a machine learning model using electronic health records to predict trauma- and stressor-related psychiatric disorders after hospitalization with sepsis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A significant minority of individuals develop trauma- and stressor-related disorders (TSRD) after surviving sepsis, a life-threatening immune response to infections. Accurate prediction of risk for TSRD can facilitate targeted early intervention strategies, but many existing models rely on research measures that are impractical to incorporate to standard emergency department workflows. To increase the feasibility of implementation, we developed models that predict TSRD in the year after survival from sepsis using only electronic health records from the hospitalization ( n = 217,122 hospitalizations from 2012-2015). The optimal model was evaluated in a temporally independent prospective test sample ( n = 128,783 hospitalizations from 2016-2017), where patients in the highest-risk decile accounted for nearly one-third of TSRD cases. Our approach demonstrates that risk for TSRD after sepsis can be stratified without additional assessment burden on clinicians and patients, which increases the likelihood of model implementation in hospital settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data.

          The simplest approach to dealing with missing data is to restrict the analysis to complete cases, i.e. individuals with no missing values. This can induce bias, however. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) is a commonly used method to correct this bias. It is also used to adjust for unequal sampling fractions in sample surveys. This article is a review of the use of IPW in epidemiological research. We describe how the bias in the complete-case analysis arises and how IPW can remove it. IPW is compared with multiple imputation (MI) and we explain why, despite MI generally being more efficient, IPW may sometimes be preferred. We discuss the choice of missingness model and methods such as weight truncation, weight stabilisation and augmented IPW. The use of IPW is illustrated on data from the 1958 British Birth Cohort.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Enhancing Recovery From Sepsis

            Survival from sepsis has improved in recent years, resulting in an increasing number of patients who have survived sepsis treatment. Current sepsis guidelines do not provide guidance on posthospital care or recovery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anxiety symptoms in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

              Objectives To evaluate the epidemiology of, and post-intensive care unit (ICU) interventions for anxiety symptoms after critical illness Methods We searched 5 databases (1970-2015) to identify studies assessing anxiety symptoms in adult ICU survivors. Data from studies using the most common assessment instrument were meta-analyzed. Results We identified 27 studies (2,880 patients) among 27,334 citations. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) was the most common instrument (81% of studies). We pooled data at 2-3, 6, and 12-14 month time-points, with anxiety symptom prevalences (HADS-A≥8, 95%CI) of 32%(27-38%), 40%(33-46%), and 34%(25-42%), respectively. In a subset of studies with repeated assessments in the exact same patients, there was no significant change in anxiety score or prevalence over time. Age, gender, severity of illness, diagnosis, and length of stay were not associated with anxiety symptoms. Psychiatric symptoms during admission and memories of in-ICU delusional experiences were potential risk factors. Physical rehabilitation and ICU diaries had potential benefit. Conclusions One-third of ICU survivors experience anxiety symptoms that are persistent during their first year of recovery. Psychiatric symptoms during admission and memories of in–ICU delusional experiences were associated with post-ICU anxiety. Physical rehabilitation and ICU diaries merit further investigation as possible interventions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                spapini@hawaii.edu
                Journal
                Transl Psychiatry
                Transl Psychiatry
                Translational Psychiatry
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2158-3188
                18 December 2023
                18 December 2023
                2023
                : 13
                : 400
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.280062.e, ISNI 0000 0000 9957 7758, Division of Research, , Kaiser Permanente Northern California, ; Oakland, CA USA
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, ( https://ror.org/01wspgy28) Honolulu, HI USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-4437
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6837-4998
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0900-4249
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-6828
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6987-8423
                Article
                2699
                10.1038/s41398-023-02699-6
                10730505
                38114475
                487b643d-5f13-4376-8331-981d37c692fd
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 25 April 2023
                : 17 November 2023
                : 29 November 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000025, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH);
                Award ID: 5T32MH125792
                Award ID: 1K23MH126078
                Award ID: 5T32MH125792
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Pilot Award and Delivery Science Fellowship from The Permanente Medical Group
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
                Funded by: Pilot Award from The Permanente Medical Group
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000057, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS);
                Award ID: 5R35GM128672
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2023

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                psychiatric disorders,prognostic markers
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                psychiatric disorders, prognostic markers

                Comments

                Comment on this article