Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A qualitative study of VHA clinicians’ knowledge and perspectives on cannabis for medical purposes

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 3 , 5
      Family Practice
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The legalization of cannabis is expanding across the USA, and its use has increased significantly, including among Veterans. Although the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) abides by the classification of cannabis as a Schedule I substance, it recently recommended that clinicians discuss cannabis with their patients. Little is known about VHA clinicians’ perspectives on and knowledge of cannabis.

          Objective

          We sought to better understand clinicians’ attitudes, beliefs, knowledge and communication with patients regarding cannabis.

          Methods

          We conducted semi-structured phone interviews with 14 VHA clinicians. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis.

          Results

          VA clinicians described ambivalence towards cannabis for therapeutic purposes and identified several factors that inhibit conversations about cannabis use with their patients including discomfort with the lack of product standardization; lack of research examining the effectiveness and risks of cannabis use; unfamiliarity with pharmacology, formulations, and dosing of cannabis; and uncertainty regarding VHA policy. Clinicians had differing views on cannabis in the context of the opioid crisis.

          Conclusions

          VA clinicians face challenges in navigating the topic of medical cannabis. Educational materials about cannabis products, dose and harms would be helpful to clinicians.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design

              This article provides researchers with knowledge of how to design a high quality mixed methods research study. To design a mixed study, researchers must understand and carefully consider each of the dimensions of mixed methods design, and always keep an eye on the issue of validity. We explain the seven major design dimensions: purpose, theoretical drive, timing (simultaneity and dependency), point of integration, typological versus interactive design approaches, planned versus emergent design, and design complexity. There also are multiple secondary dimensions that need to be considered during the design process. We explain ten secondary dimensions of design to be considered for each research study. We also provide two case studies showing how the mixed designs were constructed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Family Practice
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1460-2229
                August 01 2021
                July 28 2021
                February 09 2021
                August 01 2021
                July 28 2021
                February 09 2021
                : 38
                : 4
                : 479-483
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Evidence Synthesis Program (ESP), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
                [2 ]Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute (OCTRI), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
                [3 ]Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
                [4 ]Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
                [5 ]Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
                Article
                10.1093/fampra/cmaa151
                33558870
                484dd914-4ad4-4fe0-b336-8b79d0481302
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content541

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors355