38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The effect of respiratory activity, non‐invasive respiratory support and facemasks on aerosol generation and its relevance to COVID‐19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Respirable aerosols (< 5 µm in diameter) present a high risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission. Guidelines recommend using aerosol precautions during aerosol‐generating procedures, and droplet (> 5 µm) precautions at other times. However, emerging evidence indicates respiratory activities may be a more important source of aerosols than clinical procedures such as tracheal intubation. We aimed to measure the size, total number and volume of all human aerosols exhaled during respiratory activities and therapies. We used a novel chamber with an optical particle counter sampling at 100 l.min ‐1 to count and size‐fractionate close to all exhaled particles (0.5–25 µm). We compared emissions from ten healthy subjects during six respiratory activities (quiet breathing; talking; shouting; forced expiratory manoeuvres; exercise; and coughing) with three respiratory therapies (high‐flow nasal oxygen and single or dual circuit non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation). Activities were repeated while wearing facemasks. When compared with quiet breathing, exertional respiratory activities increased particle counts 34.6‐fold during talking and 370.8‐fold during coughing (p < 0.001). High‐flow nasal oxygen 60 at l.min ‐1 increased particle counts 2.3‐fold (p = 0.031) during quiet breathing. Single and dual circuit non‐invasive respiratory therapy at 25/10 cm.H 2O with quiet breathing increased counts by 2.6‐fold and 7.8‐fold, respectively (both p < 0.001). During exertional activities, respiratory therapies and facemasks reduced emissions compared with activities alone. Respiratory activities (including exertional breathing and coughing) which mimic respiratory patterns during illness generate substantially more aerosols than non‐invasive respiratory therapies, which conversely can reduce total emissions. We argue the risk of aerosol exposure is underappreciated and warrants widespread, targeted interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Aerosol Generating Procedures and Risk of Transmission of Acute Respiratory Infections to Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review

          Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) may expose health care workers (HCWs) to pathogens causing acute respiratory infections (ARIs), but the risk of transmission of ARIs from AGPs is not fully known. We sought to determine the clinical evidence for the risk of transmission of ARIs to HCWs caring for patients undergoing AGPs compared with the risk of transmission to HCWs caring for patients not undergoing AGPs. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, University of York CRD databases, EuroScan, LILACS, Indian Medlars, Index Medicus for SE Asia, international health technology agencies and the Internet in all languages for articles from 01/01/1990 to 22/10/2010. Independent reviewers screened abstracts using pre-defined criteria, obtained full-text articles, selected relevant studies, and abstracted data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The outcome of interest was risk of ARI transmission. The quality of evidence was rated using the GRADE system. We identified 5 case-control and 5 retrospective cohort studies which evaluated transmission of SARS to HCWs. Procedures reported to present an increased risk of transmission included [n; pooled OR(95%CI)] tracheal intubation [n = 4 cohort; 6.6 (2.3, 18.9), and n = 4 case-control; 6.6 (4.1, 10.6)], non-invasive ventilation [n = 2 cohort; OR 3.1(1.4, 6.8)], tracheotomy [n = 1 case-control; 4.2 (1.5, 11.5)] and manual ventilation before intubation [n = 1 cohort; OR 2.8 (1.3, 6.4)]. Other intubation associated procedures, endotracheal aspiration, suction of body fluids, bronchoscopy, nebulizer treatment, administration of O2, high flow O2, manipulation of O2 mask or BiPAP mask, defibrillation, chest compressions, insertion of nasogastric tube, and collection of sputum were not significant. Our findings suggest that some procedures potentially capable of generating aerosols have been associated with increased risk of SARS transmission to HCWs or were a risk factor for transmission, with the most consistent association across multiple studies identified with tracheal intubation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID ‐19

            Summary Severe acute respiratory syndrome‐corona virus‐2, which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), is highly contagious. Airway management of patients with COVID‐19 is high risk to staff and patients. We aimed to develop principles for airway management of patients with COVID‐19 to encourage safe, accurate and swift performance. This consensus statement has been brought together at short notice to advise on airway management for patients with COVID‐19, drawing on published literature and immediately available information from clinicians and experts. Recommendations on the prevention of contamination of healthcare workers, the choice of staff involved in airway management, the training required and the selection of equipment are discussed. The fundamental principles of airway management in these settings are described for: emergency tracheal intubation; predicted or unexpected difficult tracheal intubation; cardiac arrest; anaesthetic care; and tracheal extubation. We provide figures to support clinicians in safe airway management of patients with COVID‐19. The advice in this document is designed to be adapted in line with local workplace policies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Size distribution and sites of origin of droplets expelled from the human respiratory tract during expiratory activities

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Fellow/Registrarnickwilson247@gmail.com , @CoVcast
                Role: Professor@Marks1Guy
                Role: Resident/Clinical Nurse Educator
                Role: Specialist Nurse
                Role: Resident/Clinical Nurse Educator
                Role: Postdoctoral Biostatistician
                Role: Clinical Nurse Educator
                Role: Consultant/Professor@doctimcook
                Role: Associate Professor@ , EuanTovey
                Journal
                Anaesthesia
                Anaesthesia
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044
                ANAE
                Anaesthesia
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0003-2409
                1365-2044
                30 March 2021
                : 10.1111/anae.15475
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Intensive Care Medicine Prince of Wales Hospital Sydney Australia
                [ 2 ] Department of Anaesthesia Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
                [ 3 ] Department of Respiratory Medicine University of New South Wales Sydney Australia
                [ 4 ] Department of Intensive Care Medicine Prince of Wales Hospital Sydney Australia
                [ 5 ] Department of Intensive Care Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia
                [ 6 ] University of New South Wales Sydney Australia
                [ 7 ] Department of Intensive Care Medicine Prince of Wales Hospital Sydney Australia
                [ 8 ] Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Royal United Hospitals NHS Trust Bath UK
                [ 9 ] Bristol Medical School University of Bristol UK
                [ 10 ] Woolcock Institute of Medical Research University of Sydney Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: N. M. Wilson

                Email: nicholas.wilson@ 123456nhs.scot

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9479-6542
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8976-8053
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3654-497X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1802-7266
                Article
                ANAE15475
                10.1111/anae.15475
                8250912
                33784793
                47ef5577-4224-4a5a-8b6c-20b35c33c99d
                © 2021 Association of Anaesthetists

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 18 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 10, Words: 12678
                Funding
                Funded by: Prince of Wales Foundation
                Award ID: 2020/NR7
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.4 mode:remove_FC converted:02.07.2021

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                aerosol‐generating procedure,airborne,nosocomial,particles
                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                aerosol‐generating procedure, airborne, nosocomial, particles

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content317

                Cited by53

                Most referenced authors7,042