Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Diagnosis, biomarkers and newer treatment protocols

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive lung condition marked by lung scarring that progresses over time and with usual interstitial pneumonia histology (UIP). It is linked to a worsening cough, dyspnea, and a worse quality of life. Around 3 million persons worldwide suffer from IPF, and the prevalence rises sharply with advancing age. The detection of the UIP pattern, generally using high-resolution CT; lung biopsy may be necessary in certain individuals; the diagnostic approach also includes the elimination of other interstitial lung illnesses or overlapping problems. The UIP pattern is mostly bilateral, peripheral, and basal, with clusters of subpleural cystic airspaces and reticular alterations linked to traction bronchiectasis. Although there are still many uncertainties about how to define susceptibility, it is believed that the molecular mechanisms causing IPF reflect an abnormal reparative response to repeated alveolar epithelial damage in an aging genetically sensitive individual. With the availability of two pharmacotherapeutic drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, that slow physiological advancement and potentially increase progression-free survival, significant progress has been made in our knowledge of the clinical treatment of IPF. The goal of current research is to develop early biomarkers for IPF that may include circulating variables, demographic information, and imaging data.

Related collections

Most cited references 435

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence-based Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management

Ganesh Raghu, Harold Collard, Jim J. J. Egan … (2011)

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 183(6), 788-824

0 comments Cited 1222 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline

Ganesh Raghu, Martine Remy-Jardin, Jeffrey L Myers … (2018)

This document provides clinical recommendations for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It represents a collaborative effort between the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society.

0 comments Cited 1208 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Luca Richeldi, Roland M du Bois, Ganesh Raghu … (2014)

Nintedanib (formerly known as BIBF 1120) is an intracellular inhibitor that targets multiple tyrosine kinases. A phase 2 trial suggested that treatment with 150 mg of nintedanib twice daily reduced lung-function decline and acute exacerbations in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. We conducted two replicate 52-week, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trials (INPULSIS-1 and INPULSIS-2) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 150 mg of nintedanib twice daily as compared with placebo in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The primary end point was the annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC). Key secondary end points were the time to the first acute exacerbation and the change from baseline in the total score on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, both assessed over a 52-week period. A total of 1066 patients were randomly assigned in a 3:2 ratio to receive nintedanib or placebo. The adjusted annual rate of change in FVC was -114.7 ml with nintedanib versus -239.9 ml with placebo (difference, 125.3 ml; 95% confidence interval [CI], 77.7 to 172.8; P<0.001) in INPULSIS-1 and -113.6 ml with nintedanib versus -207.3 ml with placebo (difference, 93.7 ml; 95% CI, 44.8 to 142.7; P<0.001) in INPULSIS-2. In INPULSIS-1, there was no significant difference between the nintedanib and placebo groups in the time to the first acute exacerbation (hazard ratio with nintedanib, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.54 to 2.42; P=0.67); in INPULSIS-2, there was a significant benefit with nintedanib versus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.77; P=0.005). The most frequent adverse event in the nintedanib groups was diarrhea, with rates of 61.5% and 18.6% in the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, in INPULSIS-1 and 63.2% and 18.3% in the two groups, respectively, in INPULSIS-2. In patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, nintedanib reduced the decline in FVC, which is consistent with a slowing of disease progression; nintedanib was frequently associated with diarrhea, which led to discontinuation of the study medication in less than 5% of patients. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; INPULSIS-1 and INPULSIS-2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01335464 and NCT01335477.).