Immune checkpoint inhibitor‐associated central nervous system autoimmunity

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Background and purpose

Outcome and rechallenge data on central nervous system (CNS) autoimmunity triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. We aim to describe a large series of patients with ICI‐triggered CNS autoimmunity, and to compare these patients with spontaneous paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed Mayo Clinic patients with ICI‐triggered CNS autoimmunity (February 2015–June 2021). Clinical characteristics were compared to spontaneous PNS patients (with antineuronal nuclear antibody [ANNA]‐1 or anti‐Hu neurological autoimmunity, and/or neuroendocrine tumors [NET]) evaluated within the same period.

Results

Thirty‐one patients were included (55% female, median age = 63 years, range = 39–76). Median time from ICI initiation was 3.65 months (range = 0.8–44.5). The most common associated malignancies were melanoma and small cell lung cancer. CNS manifestations included encephalitis ( n = 16), meningoencephalitis ( n = 8), cerebellar ataxia ( n = 4), demyelinating syndrome ( n = 2), and myelopathy ( n = 1). Magnetic resonance imaging was abnormal in 62%. Cerebrospinal fluid was inflammatory in 70%. Neural autoantibodies were identified in 47%, more frequently in patients with NET ( p = 0.046). ICI was discontinued in 97%; 90% received immunosuppressive treatment. After median 6.8 months follow‐up (range = 0.7–46), 39% had unfavorable outcomes (grade ≥ 3). This was associated with higher severity degree at onset, shorter period from ICI to neurological symptom onset, and encephalitis. Four patients were rechallenged with ICI, and one relapsed. Patients with NET and with ANNA‐1 ICI‐triggered CNS autoimmunity had associated peripheral nervous system manifestations more frequently than their spontaneous counterparts ( p = 0.007 and p = 0.028, respectively).

Conclusions

One third of ICI‐related CNS autoimmunity patients have unfavorable outcomes. Relapses may occur after ICI rechallenge. Neural autoantibodies are often present, more commonly in patients with NET.

Related collections

Most cited references 32

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy.

Drew M Pardoll (2012)

Among the most promising approaches to activating therapeutic antitumour immunity is the blockade of immune checkpoints. Immune checkpoints refer to a plethora of inhibitory pathways hardwired into the immune system that are crucial for maintaining self-tolerance and modulating the duration and amplitude of physiological immune responses in peripheral tissues in order to minimize collateral tissue damage. It is now clear that tumours co-opt certain immune-checkpoint pathways as a major mechanism of immune resistance, particularly against T cells that are specific for tumour antigens. Because many of the immune checkpoints are initiated by ligand-receptor interactions, they can be readily blocked by antibodies or modulated by recombinant forms of ligands or receptors. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) antibodies were the first of this class of immunotherapeutics to achieve US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Preliminary clinical findings with blockers of additional immune-checkpoint proteins, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), indicate broad and diverse opportunities to enhance antitumour immunity with the potential to produce durable clinical responses.

0 comments Cited 5393 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle.

Daniel S. Chen, Ira Mellman (2013)

The genetic and cellular alterations that define cancer provide the immune system with the means to generate T cell responses that recognize and eradicate cancer cells. However, elimination of cancer by T cells is only one step in the Cancer-Immunity Cycle, which manages the delicate balance between the recognition of nonself and the prevention of autoimmunity. Identification of cancer cell T cell inhibitory signals, including PD-L1, has prompted the development of a new class of cancer immunotherapy that specifically hinders immune effector inhibition, reinvigorating and potentially expanding preexisting anticancer immune responses. The presence of suppressive factors in the tumor microenvironment may explain the limited activity observed with previous immune-based therapies and why these therapies may be more effective in combination with agents that target other steps of the cycle. Emerging clinical data suggest that cancer immunotherapy is likely to become a key part of the clinical management of cancer. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

0 comments Cited 1956 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity's roles in cancer suppression and promotion.

Robert D. Schreiber, Lloyd J. Old, Mark J. Smyth (2011)

Understanding how the immune system affects cancer development and progression has been one of the most challenging questions in immunology. Research over the past two decades has helped explain why the answer to this question has evaded us for so long. We now appreciate that the immune system plays a dual role in cancer: It can not only suppress tumor growth by destroying cancer cells or inhibiting their outgrowth but also promote tumor progression either by selecting for tumor cells that are more fit to survive in an immunocompetent host or by establishing conditions within the tumor microenvironment that facilitate tumor outgrowth. Here, we discuss a unifying conceptual framework called "cancer immunoediting," which integrates the immune system's dual host-protective and tumor-promoting roles.