Evaluating restriction enzyme selection for reduced representation sequencing in conservation genomics

Abstract

Conservation genomic studies in non‐model organisms generally rely on reduced representation sequencing techniques based on restriction enzymes to identify population structure as well as candidate loci for local adaptation. While the expectation is that the reduced representation of the genome is randomly distributed, the proportion of the genome sampled might depend on the GC content of the recognition site of the restriction enzyme used. Here, we evaluated the distribution and functional composition of loci obtained after a reduced representation approach using Genotyping‐by‐Sequencing (GBS). To do so, we compared experimental data from two endemic fish species ( Symphodus ocellatus and Symphodus tinca, EcoT22I enzyme) and two ecosystem engineer sea urchins ( Paracentrotus lividus and Arbacia lixula, ApeKI enzyme). In brief, we mapped the sequenced loci to the phylogenetically closest reference genome available ( Labrus bergylta in the fish and Strongylocentrotus purpuratus in the sea urchin datasets), classified them as exonic, intronic and intergenic, and studied their function by using Gene Ontology (GO) terms. We also simulated the effect of using both enzymes in the two reference genomes. In both simulated and experimental data, we detected an enrichment towards exonic or intergenic regions depending on the restriction enzyme used and failed to detect differences between total loci and candidate loci for adaptation in the empirical dataset. Most of the functions assigned to the mapped loci were shared between the four species and involved a myriad of general functions. Our results highlight the importance of restriction enzyme selection and the need for high‐quality annotated genomes in conservation genomic studies.