5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      COVID-19 vaccination and concerns regarding vaccine hesitancy after the termination of the zero-COVID policy in China: A nationwide cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy remains prevalent globally. However, national data on this issue in the general population after the termination of the zero-COVID policy in China are limited. In March 2023, we conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey among Chinese adults using a self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regressions were employed. Among 4,966 participants, 43.8% reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy following the end of the zero-COVID policy in China. Higher rates of vaccine hesitancy were associated with being married (married: OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.17–1.57; other marital status: OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.36–2.55), working in healthcare (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.38–1.96), having both minors and older adults in the household (OR 1.45, 95%CI 1.20–1.75), having no minors and older adults in the household (OR 1.44, 95%CI 1.17–1.77), having chronic diseases (OR 1.42, 95%CI 1.23–1.64), experiencing adverse events post-vaccination (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.19–1.61), and uncertainty about previous COVID-19 infection (OR 1.45, 95%CI 1.13–1.86). Conversely, participants who had received the influenza vaccine in the past three years (OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.54–0.72), had previously taken the COVID-19 vaccine (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.32–0.59), and had higher confidence in vaccines (OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.60–0.67) were less likely to exhibit hesitancy. Our findings indicate a significant level of vaccine hesitancy, underscoring the urgent need for tailored public health strategies to address vaccine hesitancy and improve uptake post-zero-COVID policy in China. A comprehensive understanding of public concerns and related factors is essential for developing effective vaccine communication strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Vaccine hesitancy: an overview.

          Despite being recognized as one of the most successful public health measures, vaccination is perceived as unsafe and unnecessary by a growing number of individuals. Lack of confidence in vaccines is now considered a threat to the success of vaccination programs. Vaccine hesitancy is believed to be responsible for decreasing vaccine coverage and an increasing risk of vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks and epidemics. This review provides an overview of the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy. First, we will characterize vaccine hesitancy and suggest the possible causes of the apparent increase in vaccine hesitancy in the developed world. Then we will look at determinants of individual decision-making about vaccination.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Broadly neutralizing antibodies overcome SARS-CoV-2 Omicron antigenic shift

            The recently emerged SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant encodes 37 amino acid substitutions in the spike protein, 15 of which are in the receptor-binding domain (RBD), thereby raising concerns about the effectiveness of available vaccines and antibody-based therapeutics. Here we show that the Omicron RBD binds to human ACE2 with enhanced affinity, relative to the Wuhan-Hu-1 RBD, and binds to mouse ACE2. Marked reductions in neutralizing activity were observed against Omicron compared to the ancestral pseudovirus in plasma from convalescent individuals and from individuals who had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, but this loss was less pronounced after a third dose of vaccine. Most monoclonal antibodies that are directed against the receptor-binding motif lost in vitro neutralizing activity against Omicron, with only 3 out of 29 monoclonal antibodies retaining unaltered potency, including the ACE2-mimicking S2K146 antibody1. Furthermore, a fraction of broadly neutralizing sarbecovirus monoclonal antibodies neutralized Omicron through recognition of antigenic sites outside the receptor-binding motif, including sotrovimab2, S2X2593 and S2H974. The magnitude of Omicron-mediated immune evasion marks a major antigenic shift in SARS-CoV-2. Broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies that recognize RBD epitopes that are conserved among SARS-CoV-2 variants and other sarbecoviruses may prove key to controlling the ongoing pandemic and future zoonotic spillovers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients in South Africa During the COVID-19 Omicron Wave Compared With Previous Waves

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hum Vaccin Immunother
                Hum Vaccin Immunother
                Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
                Taylor & Francis
                2164-5515
                2164-554X
                14 August 2024
                2024
                14 August 2024
                : 20
                : 1
                : 2388938
                Affiliations
                [a ]Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, The Affiliated Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Nanjing Medical University; , Wuxi, China
                [b ]School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University; , Shenzhen, China
                [c ]School of Public Health, Fudan University; , Shanghai, China
                Author notes
                CONTACT Xiaojun Meng mengxiaojunwx@ 123456163.com Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, The Affiliated Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Nanjing Medical University, 499 Jincheng Road, Liangxi District, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214023, China.
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally and shared the joint first authorship.

                Article
                2388938
                10.1080/21645515.2024.2388938
                11326449
                39140437
                4687f5dc-c6f6-4ce0-bd99-797eb6f4ee53
                © 2024 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, References: 55, Pages: 12, Words: 6073
                Categories
                Research Article
                Coronavirus

                Molecular medicine
                covid-19,vaccine hesitancy,zero-covid policy,china
                Molecular medicine
                covid-19, vaccine hesitancy, zero-covid policy, china

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                1
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                1
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content192

                Most referenced authors697