7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Distant Ring Galaxies as Evidence for a Steeply Increasing Galaxy Interaction Rate with Redshift

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 images of the Local Group dwarf galaxy Tucana reveal an unbiased sample of distant field galaxies. While a large number of these galaxies can be classified according to standard Hubble types, a significant number of these galaxies can be identified as "ring" galaxies, a morphology likely induced through galaxy collisions. We have identified seven ring galaxy candidates in our fields. Assuming these galaxies lie between the redshifts of 0.1 and 1 and that there has been no evolution in the galaxy interaction rate, then the probability of finding a single ring galaxy in our field of view is less than 1%. Alternatively, if the galaxy interaction rate increases as (1 + z)**4.5, which represents a high-end estimate of the dependence of the galaxy merger rate on redshift, the probability increases to ~10%. Thus, these observations provide support for a galaxy interaction rate that increases steeply at moderate redshift. We also suggest several additional factors that may play an important role in producing the relatively large number of ring galaxies we have detected.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          04 June 1996
          Article
          10.1086/310194
          astro-ph/9606020
          465b07fb-754d-4b49-aef9-756110c40167
          History
          Custom metadata
          Postscript file, 13 Pages, 1 fig. available upon request, accepted in ApJ Letters (date not set)
          astro-ph

          Comments

          Comment on this article