0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A qualitative study of organisational resilience in care homes in Scotland

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Providing care for the dependent older person is complex and there have been persistent concerns about care quality as well as a growing recognition of the need for systems approaches to improvement. The I-SCOPE (Improving Systems of Care for the Older person) project employed Resilient Healthcare (RHC) theory and the CARE (Concepts for Applying Resilience) Model to study how care organisations adapt to complexity in everyday work, with the aim of exploring how to support resilient performance. The project was an in-depth qualitative study across multiple sites over 24 months. There were: 68 hours of non-participant observation, shadowing care staff at work and starting broad before narrowing to observe care domains of interest; n = 33 recorded one-to-one interviews (32 care staff and one senior inspector); three focus groups (n = 19; two with inspectors and one multi-disciplinary group); and five round table discussions on emergent results at a final project workshop (n = 31). All interviews and discussion groups were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Resident and family interviews (n = 8) were facilitated through use of emotional touchpoints. Analysis using QSR NVivo 12.0 focused on a) capturing everyday work in terms of the interplay between demand and capacity, adaptations and intended and unintended outcomes and b) a higher-level thematic description (care planning and use of information; coordination of everyday care activity; providing person-centred care) which gives an overview of resilient performance and how it might be enhanced. This gives important new insight for improvement. Conclusions are that resilience can be supported through more efficient use of information, supporting flexible adaptation, coordination across care domains, design of the physical environment, and family involvement based on realistic conversations about quality of life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

          Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.

            Purposeful sampling is widely used in qualitative research for the identification and selection of information-rich cases related to the phenomenon of interest. Although there are several different purposeful sampling strategies, criterion sampling appears to be used most commonly in implementation research. However, combining sampling strategies may be more appropriate to the aims of implementation research and more consistent with recent developments in quantitative methods. This paper reviews the principles and practice of purposeful sampling in implementation research, summarizes types and categories of purposeful sampling strategies and provides a set of recommendations for use of single strategy or multistage strategy designs, particularly for state implementation research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance

              The UK Medical Research Council’s widely used guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions has been replaced by a new framework, commissioned jointly by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research, which takes account of recent developments in theory and methods and the need to maximise the efficiency, use, and impact of research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                20 December 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 12
                : e0279376
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Monash, Australia
                [3 ] Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [4 ] School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom
                [5 ] NHS Education for Scotland, Inverness, United Kingdom
                [6 ] Centre for Undergraduate Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
                [7 ] The Care Inspectorate, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom
                Universita degli Studi di Milano, ITALY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2952-3182
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-8370
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-1189
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0089-779X
                Article
                PONE-D-22-14381
                10.1371/journal.pone.0279376
                9767361
                36538564
                45d6d70f-0999-4cab-972a-beb2bc495eaa
                © 2022 Ross et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 17 May 2022
                : 6 December 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Pages: 19
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000377, Dunhill Medical Trust;
                Award ID: R462/0216
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000377, Dunhill Medical Trust;
                Award ID: R462/0216
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000377, Dunhill Medical Trust;
                Award ID: R462/0216
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000377, Dunhill Medical Trust;
                Award ID: R462/0216
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000377, Dunhill Medical Trust;
                Award ID: R462/0216
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000377, Dunhill Medical Trust;
                Award ID: R462/0216
                Award Recipient :
                The ISCOPE study was funded by the Dunhill Medical Trust, award number R462/0216. Those in receipt of the award were AR, JE, PB, HE, EF, and LM. Funding url: https://dunhillmedical.org.uk/success-stories/what-does-good-care-look-like-understanding-the-complex-systems-in-care-homes/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Learning and Memory
                Learning
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Education
                Workshops
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oral Medicine
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Nursing Science
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Quality of Life
                Custom metadata
                Data cannot be shared publicly because of personal identifiers. Data are available from the University of Glasgow Institutional Data Access for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data: Professor David Conway, Professor of Dental Public Health at School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, R1012 Level 10, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, Glasgow, G2 3JZ (telephone: 01412119750; email: David.Conway@ 123456glasgow.ac.uk ).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article