9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Psychological Risks to Mother-Infant Bonding during the COVID-19 Pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The purpose of this study was to examine the association between mental health symptoms, along with psychological experiences and COVID-19 related concerns, and the self-reported maternal-infant bonding experiences of postpartum women.

          Methods

          Using data collected from May 19, 2020 to August 17, 2020, this cross-sectional online study assessed 429 women to better understand the impact of the COVID-19 on women during the postpartum period. Enrolled respondents were asked to participate in a 30–45-minute online survey about COVID-19-related experiences, pregnancy, stress, and well-being.

          Results

          Postpartum women’s depressive symptoms were related to lower quality maternal-infant bonding, but anxiety was not associated with bonding. Maternal self-efficacy, but not social support, was associated with mothers’ higher levels of maternal-infant bonding. The COVID-19-related grief was significantly associated with lower bonding. On the other hand, COVID-19-related health worries were associated with higher levels of maternal-infant bonding.

          Conclusions

          We describe potential psychological risk factors to maternal-infant bonding among postpartum women during the pandemic period. To best support the medical and psychological well-being of the mothers and infants, enhanced interdisciplinary partnerships among perinatal healthcare professionals involved in primary and/or specialty care is needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references109

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

          Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders; however, there is no brief clinical measure for assessing GAD. The objective of this study was to develop a brief self-report scale to identify probable cases of GAD and evaluate its reliability and validity. A criterion-standard study was performed in 15 primary care clinics in the United States from November 2004 through June 2005. Of a total of 2740 adult patients completing a study questionnaire, 965 patients had a telephone interview with a mental health professional within 1 week. For criterion and construct validity, GAD self-report scale diagnoses were compared with independent diagnoses made by mental health professionals; functional status measures; disability days; and health care use. A 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity. A cut point was identified that optimized sensitivity (89%) and specificity (82%). Increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment (all 6 Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey scales and disability days). Although GAD and depression symptoms frequently co-occurred, factor analysis confirmed them as distinct dimensions. Moreover, GAD and depression symptoms had differing but independent effects on functional impairment and disability. There was good agreement between self-report and interviewer-administered versions of the scale. The GAD-7 is a valid and efficient tool for screening for GAD and assessing its severity in clinical practice and research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

            L Radloff (1977)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0100714
                6400
                Pediatr Res
                Pediatr Res
                Pediatric research
                0031-3998
                1530-0447
                18 September 2021
                March 2022
                14 October 2021
                09 May 2022
                : 91
                : 4
                : 853-861
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
                [b ]Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
                [c ]Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
                Author notes

                Author contributions

                C.H.L. participated in the planning, design of the study, and analyzing the data. C.H.L., L.P.M., C.E., and S.H. participated in the acquisition of the data and interpretation of data. C.H.L. drafted the article for important intellectual content, and all authors participated in editing the manuscript. C.H.L. had primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

                [* ] Corresponding Author: Cindy H. Liu, PhD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA, Tel: 617-525-4131, Fax: 617-582-6026, chliu@ 123456bwh.harvard.edu
                Article
                NIHMS1741108
                10.1038/s41390-021-01751-9
                9008072
                34645943
                45cd0bea-ce4b-4bc3-901c-22a4fcde4b2d

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Pediatrics
                Pediatrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article