1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identifying acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using patient-reported symptoms and cough feature analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are commonly encountered in the primary care setting, though the accurate and timely diagnosis is problematic. Using technology like that employed in speech recognition technology, we developed a smartphone-based algorithm for rapid and accurate diagnosis of AECOPD. The algorithm incorporates patient-reported features (age, fever, and new cough), audio data from five coughs and can be deployed by novice users. We compared the accuracy of the algorithm to expert clinical assessment. In patients with known COPD, the algorithm correctly identified the presence of AECOPD in 82.6% (95% CI: 72.9–89.9%) of subjects ( n = 86). The absence of AECOPD was correctly identified in 91.0% (95% CI: 82.4–96.3%) of individuals ( n = 78). The diagnostic agreement was maintained in milder cases of AECOPD (PPA: 79.2%, 95% CI: 68.0–87.8%), who typically comprise the cohort presenting to primary care. The algorithm may aid early identification of AECOPD and be incorporated in patient self-management plans.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Standardisation of spirometry.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence: Systematic review and meta–analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Underreporting exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a longitudinal cohort.

              Unreported exacerbations and failure to seek medical attention may have consequences on the health of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study aims to determine the incidence of reported and unreported exacerbations, to identify predictors of reporting, and to compare the impact of reported and unreported exacerbations on health status. The study is based on a multicenter Canadian cohort of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients completed a daily diary from which exacerbations were defined as a worsening of at least one key symptom (dyspnea, sputum amount, sputum color) recorded on at least 2 consecutive days. Patients were asked to contact the study center if there was a sustained worsening of symptom. Reported exacerbations were events that led to contacting study center or health care visit. The study enrolled 421 patients. The overall incidence of diary exacerbations was 2.7 per person per year, but only 0.8 per person per year was reported. Predictors of reporting included age (HR [hazard ratio], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.98 per 5-yr increase), FEV(1)% predicted (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-0.99 per 10% increase), number of symptoms at onset (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.37-1.84 per additional symptom), and time of the week (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.22-0.56 weekend vs. weekday). There was a clinically important decline in health status for 52% of patients with reported exacerbation and 43% with unreported exacerbations. This study has shown that less than one-third of the exacerbations were reported. The number of symptoms at onset was the most important predictor of reporting an exacerbation, and both reported and unreported exacerbations had an impact on health status.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Paul.Porter@curtin.wa.edu.au
                Journal
                NPJ Digit Med
                NPJ Digit Med
                NPJ Digital Medicine
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2398-6352
                2 July 2021
                2 July 2021
                2021
                : 4
                : 107
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Joondalup Health Campus, Joondalup, WA Australia
                [2 ]Genesis Care Sleep and Respiratory, Perth, WA Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.1032.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0375 4078, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, , Curtin University, ; Bentley, WA Australia
                [4 ]PHI Research Group, Joondalup Health Campus, Joondalup, WA Australia
                [5 ]GRID grid.266886.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0402 6494, Institute of Health Research, , University of Notre Dame, ; Notre Dame, WA Australia
                [6 ]ResApp Health, Brisbane, QLD Australia
                [7 ]GRID grid.1003.2, ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, , University of Queensland, ; Brisbane, QLD Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9051-589X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3364-5414
                Article
                472
                10.1038/s41746-021-00472-x
                8253790
                34215828
                45ccee6e-7094-4fda-acae-5eae96fdbd3a
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 10 December 2020
                : 8 June 2021
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                diagnostic markers,respiratory tract diseases
                diagnostic markers, respiratory tract diseases

                Comments

                Comment on this article