6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of reductions in amyloid levels on cognitive change in randomized trials: instrumental variable meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To evaluate trials of drugs that target amyloid to determine whether reductions in amyloid levels are likely to improve cognition.

          Design

          Instrumental variable meta-analysis.

          Setting

          14 randomized controlled trials of drugs for the prevention or treatment of Alzheimer’s disease that targeted an amyloid mechanism, identified from ClinicalTrials.gov.

          Population

          Adults enrolled in randomized controlled trials of amyloid targeting drugs. Inclusion criteria for trials vary, but typically include adults aged 50 years or older with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease, and amyloid positivity at baseline.

          Main outcome measures

          Analyses included trials for which information could be obtained on both change in brain amyloid levels measured with amyloid positron emission tomography and change in at least one cognitive test score reported for each randomization arm.

          Results

          Pooled results from the 14 randomized controlled trials were more precise than estimates from any single trial. The pooled estimate for the effect of reducing amyloid levels by 0.1 standardized uptake value ratio units was an improvement in the mini-mental state examination score of 0.03 (95% confidence interval −0.06 to 0.1) points. This study provides a web application that allows for the re-estimation of the results when new data become available and illustrates the magnitude of the new evidence that would be necessary to achieve a pooled estimate supporting the benefit of reducing amyloid levels.

          Conclusions

          Pooled evidence from available trials reporting both reduction in amyloid levels and change in cognition suggests that amyloid reduction strategies do not substantially improve cognition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease at 25 years

          Abstract Despite continuing debate about the amyloid β‐protein (or Aβ hypothesis, new lines of evidence from laboratories and clinics worldwide support the concept that an imbalance between production and clearance of Aβ42 and related Aβ peptides is a very early, often initiating factor in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Confirmation that presenilin is the catalytic site of γ‐secretase has provided a linchpin: all dominant mutations causing early‐onset AD occur either in the substrate (amyloid precursor protein, APP) or the protease (presenilin) of the reaction that generates Aβ. Duplication of the wild‐type APP gene in Down's syndrome leads to Aβ deposits in the teens, followed by microgliosis, astrocytosis, and neurofibrillary tangles typical of AD. Apolipoprotein E4, which predisposes to AD in > 40% of cases, has been found to impair Aβ clearance from the brain. Soluble oligomers of Aβ42 isolated from AD patients' brains can decrease synapse number, inhibit long‐term potentiation, and enhance long‐term synaptic depression in rodent hippocampus, and injecting them into healthy rats impairs memory. The human oligomers also induce hyperphosphorylation of tau at AD‐relevant epitopes and cause neuritic dystrophy in cultured neurons. Crossing human APP with human tau transgenic mice enhances tau‐positive neurotoxicity. In humans, new studies show that low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42 and amyloid‐PET positivity precede other AD manifestations by many years. Most importantly, recent trials of three different Aβ antibodies (solanezumab, crenezumab, and aducanumab) have suggested a slowing of cognitive decline in post hoc analyses of mild AD subjects. Although many factors contribute to AD pathogenesis, Aβ dyshomeostasis has emerged as the most extensively validated and compelling therapeutic target.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Alzheimer's disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The antibody aducanumab reduces Aβ plaques in Alzheimer's disease.

              Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain, accompanied by synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration. Antibody-based immunotherapy against Aβ to trigger its clearance or mitigate its neurotoxicity has so far been unsuccessful. Here we report the generation of aducanumab, a human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets aggregated Aβ. In a transgenic mouse model of AD, aducanumab is shown to enter the brain, bind parenchymal Aβ, and reduce soluble and insoluble Aβ in a dose-dependent manner. In patients with prodromal or mild AD, one year of monthly intravenous infusions of aducanumab reduces brain Aβ in a dose- and time-dependent manner. This is accompanied by a slowing of clinical decline measured by Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes and Mini Mental State Examination scores. The main safety and tolerability findings are amyloid-related imaging abnormalities. These results justify further development of aducanumab for the treatment of AD. Should the slowing of clinical decline be confirmed in ongoing phase 3 clinical trials, it would provide compelling support for the amyloid hypothesis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: postdoctoral scholar
                Role: analyst
                Role: assistant professor
                Role: professor
                Role: analyst
                Role: professor
                Role: assistant professor
                Role: research scientist
                Role: associate professor
                Role: assistant professor
                Role: professor
                Role: professor
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                BMJ-US
                bmj
                The BMJ
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2021
                25 February 2021
                : 372
                : n156
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, USA
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                [3 ]Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
                [4 ]Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, G H Sergievsky Center, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
                [5 ]Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [6 ]23&Me, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
                [7 ]Department of Epidemiology, George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington DC, USA
                [8 ]UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: M M Glymour maria.glymour@ 123456ucsf.edu (or @MariaGlymour on Twitter)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-3081
                Article
                acks057847
                10.1136/bmj.n156
                7905687
                33632704
                45518c45-fa66-41dd-9731-a343cd534c5f
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 December 2020
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article