19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to the journal, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Effect of Customer Misbehavior, Personal Tradition, and Social Support On Frontline Employees' Turnover Intention

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Increasingly fierce market competition has put forward higher requirements for the service quality of frontline employees. At the same time, the misbehavior of some customers has negative effects on frontline employees. Therefore, this study focused on the mechanism between customer misbehavior and frontline employees' turnover intention, and used Mplus 8.0 and HLM 6.08 to analyze data from 318 questionnaires. We found the following results: Customer misbehavior was positively related to employees' turnover intention, personal tradition was negatively related to employees' turnover intention, personal tradition played a moderating role in the relationship between customer misbehavior and employees' turnover intention, social support was negatively related to employees' turnover intention, and social support played a moderating role in the relationship between customer misbehavior and employees' turnover intention. Our conclusions enrich human resource management theory and provide reference for service-oriented enterprises tmprove the stability of frontline employees.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal
          soc behav pers
          Scientific Journal Publishers Ltd
          0301-2212
          August 02 2023
          August 02 2023
          : 51
          : 8
          : 1-11
          Affiliations
          [1 ]School of Economics and Management, Pingdingshan University, People's Republic of China
          [2 ]Faculty of Philosophy and Political Science, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan
          [3 ]Department of Management, Emilio Aguinaldo College, Philippines
          Article
          10.2224/sbp.12487
          44e3f45f-8829-4f38-89f6-9f41ff5026c5
          © 2023
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article