6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ImmunosuppressiveTherapies Differently Modulate Humoral- and T-Cell-Specific Responses to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 2 , 4 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 2 , 5 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 6 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 7 , 4 , 8 , 6 , 2 ,
      Frontiers in Immunology
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      COVID-19, mRNA vaccine, rheumatoid arthritis, whole blood, T cell response, antibody response, DMARD (disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug), biological therapy

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To assess in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, treated with different immunosuppressive therapies, the induction of SARS-CoV-2-specific immune response after vaccination in terms of anti-region-binding-domain (RBD)-antibody- and T-cell-specific responses against spike, and the vaccine safety in terms of clinical impact on disease activity.

          Methods

          Health care workers (HCWs) and RA patients, having completed the BNT162b2-mRNA vaccination in the last 2 weeks, were enrolled. Serological response was evaluated by quantifying anti-RBD antibodies, while the cell-mediated response was evaluated by a whole-blood test quantifying the interferon (IFN)-γ-response to spike peptides. FACS analysis was performed to identify the cells responding to spike stimulation. RA disease activity was evaluated by clinical examination through the DAS28crp, and local and/or systemic clinical adverse events were registered. In RA patients, the ongoing therapeutic regimen was modified during the vaccination period according to the American College of Rheumatology indications.

          Results

          We prospectively enrolled 167 HCWs and 35 RA patients. Anti-RBD-antibodies were detected in almost all patients (34/35, 97%), although the titer was significantly reduced in patients under CTLA-4-inhibitors (median: 465 BAU/mL, IQR: 103-1189, p<0.001) or IL-6-inhibitors (median: 492 BAU/mL, IQR: 161-1007, p<0.001) compared to HCWs (median: 2351 BAU/mL, IQR: 1389-3748). T-cell-specific response scored positive in most of RA patients [24/35, (69%)] with significantly lower IFN-γ levels in patients under biological therapy such as IL-6-inhibitors (median: 33.2 pg/mL, IQR: 6.1-73.9, p<0.001), CTLA-4-inhibitors (median: 10.9 pg/mL, IQR: 3.7-36.7, p<0.001), and TNF-α-inhibitors (median: 89.6 pg/mL, IQR: 17.8-224, p=0.002) compared to HCWs (median: 343 pg/mL, IQR: 188-756). A significant correlation between the anti-RBD-antibody titer and spike-IFN-γ-specific T-cell response was found in RA patients (rho=0.432, p=0.009). IFN-γ T-cell response was mediated by CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. Finally, no significant increase in disease activity was found in RA patients following vaccination.

          Conclusion

          This study showed for the first time that antibody-specific and whole-blood spike-specific T-cell responses induced by the COVID-19 mRNA-vaccine were present in the majority of RA patients, who underwent a strategy of temporary suspension of immunosuppressive treatment during vaccine administration. However, the magnitude of specific responses was dependent on the immunosuppressive therapy administered. In RA patients, BNT162b2 vaccine was safe and disease activity remained stable.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine

          Abstract Background Vaccines are needed to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and to protect persons who are at high risk for complications. The mRNA-1273 vaccine is a lipid nanoparticle–encapsulated mRNA-based vaccine that encodes the prefusion stabilized full-length spike protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes Covid-19. Methods This phase 3 randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 99 centers across the United States. Persons at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection or its complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two intramuscular injections of mRNA-1273 (100 μg) or placebo 28 days apart. The primary end point was prevention of Covid-19 illness with onset at least 14 days after the second injection in participants who had not previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Results The trial enrolled 30,420 volunteers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vaccine or placebo (15,210 participants in each group). More than 96% of participants received both injections, and 2.2% had evidence (serologic, virologic, or both) of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline. Symptomatic Covid-19 illness was confirmed in 185 participants in the placebo group (56.5 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7 to 65.3) and in 11 participants in the mRNA-1273 group (3.3 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0); vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3 to 96.8%; P<0.001). Efficacy was similar across key secondary analyses, including assessment 14 days after the first dose, analyses that included participants who had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline, and analyses in participants 65 years of age or older. Severe Covid-19 occurred in 30 participants, with one fatality; all 30 were in the placebo group. Moderate, transient reactogenicity after vaccination occurred more frequently in the mRNA-1273 group. Serious adverse events were rare, and the incidence was similar in the two groups. Conclusions The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.

            The 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR; formerly, the American Rheumatism Association) classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been criticized for their lack of sensitivity in early disease. This work was undertaken to develop new classification criteria for RA. A joint working group from the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism developed, in 3 phases, a new approach to classifying RA. The work focused on identifying, among patients newly presenting with undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis, factors that best discriminated between those who were and those who were not at high risk for persistent and/or erosive disease--this being the appropriate current paradigm underlying the disease construct "rheumatoid arthritis." In the new criteria set, classification as "definite RA" is based on the confirmed presence of synovitis in at least 1 joint, absence of an alternative diagnosis that better explains the synovitis, and achievement of a total score of 6 or greater (of a possible 10) from the individual scores in 4 domains: number and site of involved joints (score range 0-5), serologic abnormality (score range 0-3), elevated acute-phase response (score range 0-1), and symptom duration (2 levels; range 0-1). This new classification system redefines the current paradigm of RA by focusing on features at earlier stages of disease that are associated with persistent and/or erosive disease, rather than defining the disease by its late-stage features. This will refocus attention on the important need for earlier diagnosis and institution of effective disease-suppressing therapy to prevent or minimize the occurrence of the undesirable sequelae that currently comprise the paradigm underlying the disease construct "rheumatoid arthritis."
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection

              Understanding immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 is critical for improving diagnostics and vaccines, and for assessing the likely future course of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed multiple compartments of circulating immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 in 254 samples from 188 COVID-19 cases, including 43 samples at ≥ 6 months post-infection. IgG to the Spike protein was relatively stable over 6+ months. Spike-specific memory B cells were more abundant at 6 months than at 1 month post symptom onset. SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells declined with a half-life of 3-5 months. By studying antibody, memory B cell, CD4+ T cell, and CD8+ T cell memory to SARS-CoV-2 in an integrated manner, we observed that each component of SARS-CoV-2 immune memory exhibited distinct kinetics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                14 September 2021
                2021
                14 September 2021
                : 12
                : 740249
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University, S. Andrea University Hospital , Rome, Italy
                [2] 2Translational Research Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani-IRCCS , Rome, Italy
                [3] 3Laboratory of Cellular Immunology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani-IRCCS , Rome, Italy
                [4] 4Laboratory of Virology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani-IRCCS , Rome, Italy
                [5] 5Unità Operativa Semplice (UOS) Professioni Sanitarie Tecniche, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani-IRCCS , Rome, Italy
                [6] 6Clinical Division of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani-IRCCS , Rome, Italy
                [7] 7UOC Emerging Infections and Centro di Riferimento AIDS (CRAIDS), National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani-IRCCS , Rome, Italy
                [8] 8Scientific Direction, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani-IRCCS , Rome, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Trine N. Jorgensen, Case Western Reserve University, United States

                Reviewed by: Balaji Banoth, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, United States; Cate Speake, Benaroya Research Institute, United States

                *Correspondence: Delia Goletti, delia.goletti@ 123456inmi.it

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                ‡Members of INMI COVID-19 Vaccine Study Group are listed in the Acknowledgments

                §ORCID: Alessandra Aiello, orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-9383; Chiara Farroni, orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-9936; Federica Repele, orcid.org/0000-0002-2780-4100; Anna Maria Gerarda Altera, orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-5232; Saied Najafi Fard, orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-8934; Valentina Vanini, orcid.org/0000-0001-8476-964X; Delia Goletti, orcid.org/0000-0001-8360-4376

                This article was submitted to Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2021.740249
                8477040
                34594343
                44dfe64a-5a9e-417c-8241-3f8a8cc51264
                Copyright © 2021 Picchianti-Diamanti, Aiello, Laganà, Agrati, Castilletti, Meschi, Farroni, Lapa, Najafi Fard, Cuzzi, Cimini, Grassi, Vanini, Di Rosa, Salemi, Nalli, Salmi, Repele, Altera, Maffongelli, Palazzolo, Vita, Leone, Puro, Capobianchi, Ippolito, Nicastri and Goletti

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 July 2021
                : 17 August 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 42, Pages: 11, Words: 5509
                Categories
                Immunology
                Original Research

                Immunology
                covid-19,mrna vaccine,rheumatoid arthritis,whole blood,t cell response,antibody response,dmard (disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug),biological therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article