25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Oceans of plenty? Challenges, advancements, and future directions for the provision of evidence-based fisheries management advice

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Marine population modeling, which underpins the scientific advice to support fisheries interventions, is an active research field with recent advancements to address modern challenges (e.g., climate change) and enduring issues (e.g., data limitations). Based on discussions during the ‘Land of Plenty’ session at the 2021 World Fisheries Congress, we synthesize current challenges, recent advances, and interdisciplinary developments in biological fisheries models (i.e., data-limited, stock assessment, spatial, ecosystem, and climate), management strategy evaluation, and the scientific advice that bridges the science-policy interface. Our review demonstrates that proliferation of interdisciplinary research teams and enhanced data collection protocols have enabled increased integration of spatiotemporal, ecosystem, and socioeconomic dimensions in many fisheries models. However, not all management systems have the resources to implement model-based advice, while protocols for sharing confidential data are lacking and impeding research advances. We recommend that management and modeling frameworks continue to adopt participatory co-management approaches that emphasize wider inclusion of local knowledge and stakeholder input to fill knowledge gaps and promote information sharing. Moreover, fisheries management, by which we mean the end-to-end process of data collection, scientific analysis, and implementation of evidence-informed management actions, must integrate improved communication, engagement, and capacity building, while incorporating feedback loops at each stage. Increasing application of management strategy evaluation is viewed as a critical unifying component, which will bridge fisheries modeling disciplines, aid management decision-making, and better incorporate the array of stakeholders, thereby leading to a more proactive, pragmatic, transparent, and inclusive management framework–ensuring better informed decisions in an uncertain world.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11160-022-09726-7.

          Related collections

          Most cited references215

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Knowledge systems for sustainable development.

          The challenge of meeting human development needs while protecting the earth's life support systems confronts scientists, technologists, policy makers, and communities from local to global levels. Many believe that science and technology (S&T) must play a more central role in sustainable development, yet little systematic scholarship exists on how to create institutions that effectively harness S&T for sustainability. This study suggests that efforts to mobilize S&T for sustainability are more likely to be effective when they manage boundaries between knowledge and action in ways that simultaneously enhance the salience, credibility, and legitimacy of the information they produce. Effective systems apply a variety of institutional mechanisms that facilitate communication, translation and mediation across boundaries.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Lessons in modelling and management of marine ecosystems: the Atlantis experience

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status

              Significance This article compiles estimates of the status of fish stocks from all available scientific assessments, comprising roughly half of the world’s fish catch, and shows that, on average, fish stocks are increasing where they are assessed. We pair this with surveys of the nature and extent of fisheries management systems, and demonstrate that where fisheries are intensively managed, the stocks are above target levels or rebuilding. Where fisheries management is less intense, stock status and trends are worse. We review evidence on the half of world fisheries that are not assessed or intensively managed and suggest their status is much worse than where fisheries are intensively managed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                daniel.goethel@noaa.gov
                Journal
                Rev Fish Biol Fish
                Rev Fish Biol Fish
                Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0960-3166
                1573-5184
                15 September 2022
                : 1-36
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Auke Bay Laboratories, Marine Ecology and Stock Assessment (MESA) Program, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Juneau, AK 99801 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.264889.9, ISNI 0000 0001 1940 3051, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary, ; Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.34477.33, ISNI 0000000122986657, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, , University of Washington, ; Seattle, WA 98195-5020 USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.422702.1, ISNI 0000 0001 1356 4495, Office of Science and Technology, , NOAA Fisheries, ; Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.422702.1, ISNI 0000 0001 1356 4495, Fisheries Resource, Analysis, and Monitoring (FRAM) Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, , NOAA Fisheries, ; Newport, OR 97365 USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.7836.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, Marine Resource Assessment and Management (MARAM) Group, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, , University of Cape Town, ; Rondebosch, 7701 South Africa
                [7 ]CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
                [8 ]GRID grid.422702.1, ISNI 0000 0001 1356 4495, Fisheries Resource, Analysis, and Monitoring (FRAM) Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, , NOAA Fisheries, ; Seattle, WA 98112 USA
                [9 ]GRID grid.492990.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0402 7163, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, ; Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
                [10 ]GRID grid.464686.e, ISNI 0000 0001 1520 1671, SARDI Aquatic Sciences, ; Henley Beach, SA 5022 Australia
                [11 ]GRID grid.422702.1, ISNI 0000 0001 1356 4495, Habitat and Ecological Process Research (HEPR) Program, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, , NOAA Fisheries, ; Seattle, WA 98115 USA
                [12 ]GRID grid.1003.2, ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, Ecological Modelling Services Pty Ltd & Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, , University of Queensland, ; St Lucia, QLD 4067 Australia
                [13 ]GRID grid.422702.1, ISNI 0000 0001 1356 4495, Resource Evaluation and Assessment Division, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, , NOAA Fisheries, ; Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
                [14 ]The Safina Center, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
                [15 ]GRID grid.484196.6, ISNI 0000 0004 0445 3226, Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, , Government of Western Australia, ; North Beach, WA 6920 Australia
                [16 ]GRID grid.502875.d, ISNI 0000 0004 9414 2922, Science & Standards, Marine Stewardship Council, ; EC1A 2DH London, U.K.
                [17 ]GRID grid.33997.37, ISNI 0000 0000 9500 7395, Oceanic Fisheries Programme, , The Pacific Community (SPC), ; B.P. D5, 98848 Nouméa, New Caledonia
                [18 ]GRID grid.422702.1, ISNI 0000 0001 1356 4495, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, , NOAA Fisheries, ; Seattle, WA 98112 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0066-431X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9162-4761
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8489-2488
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7121-6181
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1408-7122
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-0123
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-4200
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7812-6728
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2699-1247
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8698-8774
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1544-0469
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-1010
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8109-005X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5788-3073
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4216-2513
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5180-8152
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-1590
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8060-723X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-6944
                Article
                9726
                10.1007/s11160-022-09726-7
                9476434
                36124316
                44b11908-21f2-4223-870f-2747fde06a13
                © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 14 April 2022
                : 18 August 2022
                Categories
                Reviews

                stock assessment,fisheries management,data-limited methods (dlms),ecosystem and climate models,spatial modeling,management strategy evaluation (mse)

                Comments

                Comment on this article