2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      (Un)holy Smokes? Religion and Traditional and E-Cigarette Use in the United States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study employed national cross-sectional survey data from the 2021 Crime, Health, and Politics Survey ( n = 1578 to 1735) to model traditional cigarette and e-cigarette use as a function of religious affiliation, general religiosity, biblical literalism, religious struggles, and the sense of divine control. Although the odds of abstaining from cigarettes and e-cigarettes were comparable for conservative Protestants and non-affiliates, conservative Protestants were more likely to cut down on cigarettes and e-cigarettes during the pandemic. Religiosity increased the odds of abstaining from cigarettes (not e-cigarettes) and reduced pandemic consumption of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Biblical literalism was unrelated to abstaining from cigarettes and pandemic changes in cigarette use; however, biblical literalists were more likely to cut e-cigarette use during the pandemic. While the sense of divine control was unrelated to abstaining from cigarettes and e-cigarettes, these beliefs increased the odds of cessation from traditional and e-cigarette use. Finally, our religious struggles index was unrelated to smoking behavior. Our study is among the first to report any association between religion and lower e-cigarette use.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The Logic of Practice

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Tobacco Product Use Among Adults — United States, 2019

            Cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States ( 1 ). The prevalence of current cigarette smoking among U.S. adults has declined over the past several decades, with a prevalence of 13.7% in 2018 ( 2 ). However, a variety of combustible, noncombustible, and electronic tobacco products are available in the United States ( 1 , 3 ). To assess recent national estimates of tobacco product use among U.S. adults aged ≥18 years, CDC analyzed data from the 2019 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). In 2019, an estimated 50.6 million U.S. adults (20.8%) reported currently using any tobacco product, including cigarettes (14.0%), e-cigarettes (4.5%), cigars (3.6%), smokeless tobacco (2.4%), and pipes* (1.0%). † Most current tobacco product users (80.5%) reported using combustible products (cigarettes, cigars, or pipes), and 18.6% reported using two or more tobacco products. § The prevalence of any current tobacco product use was higher among males; adults aged ≤65 years; non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) adults; those whose highest level of educational attainment was a General Educational Development (GED) certificate; those with an annual household income 30% or unweighted denominator 30% or unweighted denominator <50. The figure is a bar chart showing the cigarette smoking status (current, former, or never) among current adult e-cigarette users, by age group. The prevalence of any current tobacco product use was higher among males (26.2%) than among females (15.7%) and among those aged 25–44 years (25.3%), 45–64 years (23.0%), or 18–24 years (18.2%) than among those aged ≥65 years (11.4%) (Table). Current tobacco product use was also higher among non-Hispanic AI/AN adults (29.3%), non-Hispanic adults of other †††† races (28.1%), non-Hispanic White adults (23.3%), non-Hispanic Black adults (20.7%), and Hispanic or Latino adults (13.2%) than among non-Hispanic Asian adults (11.0%); and among those living in the Midwest (23.7%) or South (22.9%) than among those in the Northeast (18.5%) or West (16.4%). The prevalence of current tobacco product use was higher among those whose highest educational attainment was a GED (43.7%) than among those with other levels of education; among those who were divorced/separated/widowed (23.5%) or single/never married/not living with a partner (23.0%) than among those married/living with a partner (19.2%); among those who had annual household income of <$35,000 (27.0%) than among those with higher income; and among LGB adults (29.9%) than among those who were heterosexual/straight (20.5%). Prevalence was also higher among adults who were uninsured (30.2%), insured by Medicaid (30.0%), or had some other public insurance (25.6%) than among those with private insurance (18.0%) or Medicare only (11.4%); among those who had a disability (26.9%) compared with those without (20.1%); and among those who had GAD-7 scores indicating mild (30.4%), moderate (34.2%) or severe (45.3%) anxiety than among those indicating no or minimal (18.4%) anxiety. Discussion In 2019, approximately one in five U.S. adults (50.6 million) reported currently using any tobacco product. Cigarettes were the most commonly used tobacco product among adults, and combustible tobacco products (cigarettes, cigars, or pipes) were used by most (80.5%) adult tobacco product users. Most of the death and disease from tobacco use in the United States is primarily caused by cigarettes and other combustible products ( 1 ); therefore, continued efforts to reduce all forms of combustible tobacco smoking among U.S. adults are warranted. Moreover, approximately one in five current tobacco product users (18.6%) reported using two or more tobacco products, and differences in prevalence of tobacco use were also seen across population groups, with higher prevalence among those with a GED, American Indian/Alaska Natives, uninsured adults and adults with Medicaid, and LGB adults. Each of these groups has experienced social, economic, and environmental stressors that might contribute to higher tobacco use prevalence ( 6 ). Comprehensive strategies at the national, state, and local levels, including targeted interventions and tailored community engagement, can reduce tobacco-related disease and death and help to mitigate tobacco-related disparities ( 1 , 4 , 6 ). U.S. adults also reported using various noncigarette tobacco products, with e-cigarettes being the most commonly used noncigarette tobacco product (4.5%). E-cigarette use was highest among adults aged 18–24 years (9.3%), with over half (56.0%) of these young adults reporting that they had never smoked cigarettes. In addition, the tobacco product with the highest percentage of users aged 18–24 years (24.5%) was e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes contain nicotine, which is highly addictive, can prime the brain for addiction to other drugs, and can harm brain development, which continues until about age 25 years ( 3 ). Although e-cigarette use was lower among the older age groups, more than 40% of e-cigarette users in the 25–44, 45–64 and ≥65 years age groups reported being former smokers. Although some evidence suggests that the use of e-cigarettes containing nicotine and more frequent use of e-cigarettes are associated with increased smoking cessation, smokers need to completely stop smoking cigarettes and stop using any other tobacco product to achieve meaningful health benefits ( 6 , 7 ). The U.S. Surgeon General concluded that there is presently inadequate evidence to conclude that e-cigarettes, in general, increase smoking cessation, and further research is needed on the effects that e-cigarettes have on cessation ( 7 ). Therefore, continued efforts to reduce use of all tobacco products, combustible and noncombustible, are needed. The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, the 59.1% response rate might have resulted in nonresponse bias, although sample weighting is designed to account for this. Second, self-reported responses were not validated by biochemical testing for cotinine (a biomarker indicating nicotine exposure); however, there is high correlation between self-reported smoking and smokeless use and cotinine levels ( 8 , 9 ). Third, because NHIS is limited to the noninstitutionalized U.S. civilian population, these results might not be generalizable to institutionalized populations and persons in the military. Finally, this analysis does not provide comparisons of prevalence estimates with previous surveys because changes in weighting and design methodology for the 2019 NHIS have the potential to affect comparisons of weighted survey estimates over time. §§§§ The implementation of comprehensive, evidence-based, population-level interventions in coordination with regulation of tobacco products, can reduce tobacco-related disease, disparities, and death in the United States ( 1 , 4 ). These evidence-based, population-level strategies include implementation of tobacco price increases, comprehensive smoke-free policies, high-impact antitobacco media campaigns, and barrier-free cessation coverage ( 1 ). As part of a comprehensive approach, targeted interventions are also warranted to reach subpopulations with the highest prevalence of use, which might vary by tobacco product type. Summary What is already known about this topic? Cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States; however, a variety of new combustible, noncombustible, and electronic tobacco products are available in the United States. What is added by this report? In 2019, approximately 20.8% of U.S. adults (50.6 million) currently used any tobacco product. Cigarettes were the most commonly used tobacco product among adults, and e-cigarettes were the most commonly used noncigarette tobacco product (4.5%). The highest prevalence of e-cigarette use was among smokers aged 18–24 years (9.3%), with over half (56.0%) of these young adults reporting that they had never smoked cigarettes. What are the implications for public health practice? The implementation of comprehensive, evidence-based, population-level interventions, combined with targeted strategies, in coordination with regulation of tobacco products, can reduce tobacco-related disease and death in the United States. As part of a comprehensive approach, targeted interventions are also warranted to reach subpopulations with the greatest use, which might vary by tobacco product type.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Tobacco Product Use and Cessation Indicators Among Adults — United States, 2018

              Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States ( 1 ). The prevalence of adult cigarette smoking has declined in recent years to 14.0% in 2017 ( 2 ). However, an array of new tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, has entered the U.S. market ( 3 ). To assess recent national estimates of tobacco product use among U.S. adults aged ≥18 years, CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the National Cancer Institute analyzed data from the 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). In 2018, an estimated 49.1 million U.S. adults (19.7%) reported currently using any tobacco product, including cigarettes (13.7%), cigars (3.9%), e-cigarettes (3.2%), smokeless tobacco (2.4%), and pipes* (1.0%). Most tobacco product users (83.8%) reported using combustible products (cigarettes, cigars, or pipes), and 18.8% reported using two or more tobacco products. The prevalence of any current tobacco product use was higher in males; adults aged ≤65 years; non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives; those with a General Educational Development certificate (GED); those with an annual household income 30% that are not presented. ††† Hispanic persons could be of any race. All other racial/ethnic groups were non-Hispanic. §§§ Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia; West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. ¶¶¶ Based on income variables from the family file (n = 8,310 missing valid income data). Imputed income files were not used in this analysis. **** Private coverage: includes adults who have any comprehensive private insurance plan (including health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations). Medicaid: for adults aged 30%; neither daily use nor nondaily use is presented. The figure is a bar chart showing the prevalence of daily and nondaily use of selected tobacco products among adults aged ≥18 years who currently use each tobacco product, in the United States, during 2018. The prevalence of any current tobacco product use was higher among males (25.8%) than among females (14.1%) and among persons aged 25–44 years (23.8%), 45–64 years (21.3%), and 18–24 years (17.1%) than among those aged ≥65 years (11.9%) (Table). Current tobacco product use was also higher among non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native adults (32.3%), non-Hispanic multiracial adults (25.4%), non-Hispanic whites (21.9%), non-Hispanic blacks (19.3%), and Hispanic adults (13.8%) than among non-Hispanic Asian adults (10.0%), as well as among those who lived in the Midwest (23.6%) or the South U.S. Census regions (21.4%) than among those who lived in the West (15.3%) or the Northeast (17.5%). The prevalence of current tobacco product use was also higher among persons who had a GED (41.4%) than among those with other levels of education and among those who were divorced, separated, or widowed (22.6%) or single, never married, or not living with a partner (21.1%) than among those married or living with a partner (18.4%). Current tobacco product use was higher among persons with an annual household income 1 day during the past 12 months because they were trying to quit smoking and former smokers who quit during the past year. † Percentage of former cigarette smokers who quit smoking for ≥6 months during the past year, among current smokers who smoked for ≥2 years and former smokers who quit during the past year. § Percentage of persons who ever smoked (≥100 cigarettes during lifetime) who have quit smoking. The figure is a line chart showing the prevalence of past-year quit attempts and recent cessation and quit ratio among cigarette smokers aged ≥18 years, in the United States, during 2009–2018. Discussion The approximate two thirds decline in adult cigarette smoking prevalence that has occurred since 1965 represents a major public health success ( 1 ). In 2018, 13.7% of U.S. adults aged ≥18 years currently smoked cigarettes, the lowest prevalence recorded since 1965. However, no significant change in cigarette smoking prevalence occurred during 2017–2018. Most cigarette smokers and smokeless tobacco users reported daily use, whereas most e-cigarette and cigar users reported nondaily use. Even nondaily use of cigarettes has been linked to increased mortality risk ( 6 ). Quitting smoking at any age is beneficial for health ( 1 , 4 ). During 2009–2018, significant linear increases occurred in quit attempts, recent successful cessation, and quit ratio. Population-based tobacco control interventions, including high-impact tobacco education campaigns like CDC’s Tips From Former Smokers (https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/index.html) campaign and FDA’s Every Try Counts campaign (https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/every-try-counts-campaign), combined with barrier-free access to evidence-based cessation treatments, can both motivate persons who use tobacco products to try to quit and help them succeed in quitting. The prevalence of adult e-cigarette use increased from 2.8% in 2017 to 3.2% in 2018 but was much lower than the 20.8% ( 7 ) of U.S. high school students reporting past 30-day e-cigarette use in 2018. The prevalence of e-cigarette use among persons aged 18–24 years is higher than that among other adult age groups, and e-cigarette use in this age group increased from 5.2% in 2017 ( 2 ) to 7.6% in 2018. During 2014–2017 there had been a downward trajectory of adult e-cigarette use ( 2 , 8 ), but during 2017–2018 a significant increase in adult e-cigarette use was detected for the first time. This increase might be related to the emergence of new types of e-cigarettes, especially “pod-mod” devices, which frequently use nicotine salts as opposed to the free-base nicotine used in other e-cigarettes and tobacco products. Sales of JUUL, a pod-mod device, increased by approximately 600% from 2016 to 2017, making it the dominant e-cigarette product in the United States by the end of 2017 ( 9 ). Further research is needed to monitor patterns of e-cigarette use and the relationship between use of e-cigarettes and other tobacco products (e.g., cigarette smoking). The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, responses were self-reported and were not validated by biochemical testing. However, self-reported smoking status correlates highly with serum cotinine levels ( 10 ). Second, because NHIS is limited to the noninstitutionalized U.S. civilian population, the results are not generalizable to institutionalized populations and persons in the military. Finally, the NHIS Sample Adult response rate of 53.1% might have resulted in nonresponse bias. Coordinated efforts at the local, state, and national levels are needed to continue progress toward reducing tobacco-related disease and death in the United States. Proven strategies include implementation of tobacco price increases, comprehensive smoke-free policies, high-impact antitobacco media campaigns, barrier-free cessation coverage, and comprehensive state tobacco control programs, combined with regulation of the manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of all tobacco products ( 1 , 4 ). Summary What is already known about this topic? Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States. Adult cigarette smoking prevalence has declined; however, new tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, have entered the U.S. market. What is added by this report? In 2018, approximately 20% of U.S. adults currently used any tobacco product; cigarette smoking reached an all-time low (13.7%). During 2009–2018, significant increases in three cigarette cessation indicators occurred. During 2017–2018, e-cigarette and smokeless tobacco product use prevalence increased. What are the implications for public health practice? Continued surveillance is critical to informing tobacco control efforts at the national, state, and local levels. Coordinated efforts and regulation of all tobacco products are needed to reduce tobacco-related disease and death in the United States.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                terrence.hill@utsa.edu
                gbostean@chapman.edu
                laura_upenieks@baylor.edu
                john.bartkowski@utsa.edu
                christopher.ellison@utsa.edu
                aburdette@fsu.edu
                Journal
                J Relig Health
                J Relig Health
                Journal of Religion and Health
                Springer US (New York )
                0022-4197
                1573-6571
                15 December 2022
                : 1-26
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.215352.2, ISNI 0000000121845633, Department of Sociology, , University of Texas at San Antonio, ; One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249-1644 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.254024.5, ISNI 0000 0000 9006 1798, Department of Sociology and Environmental Science & Policy Program, , Chapman University, ; Orange, USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.252890.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2111 2894, Department of Sociology, , Baylor University, ; Waco, USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.215352.2, ISNI 0000000121845633, Department of Sociology, , University of Texas at San Antonio, ; San Antonio, USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.255986.5, ISNI 0000 0004 0472 0419, Department of Sociology and Public Health Program, , Florida State University, ; Tallahassee, USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3798-7753
                Article
                1721
                10.1007/s10943-022-01721-3
                9753896
                36520262
                449a56df-19c4-4d12-9673-0214563b8fda
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 8 December 2022
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Sociology
                religion,religiosity,smoking,cigarettes,e-cigarettes
                Sociology
                religion, religiosity, smoking, cigarettes, e-cigarettes

                Comments

                Comment on this article