3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The gestational foundation of sex differences in development and vulnerability

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite long-standing interest in the role of sex on human development, the functional consequences of fetal sex on early development are not well understood. Here we explore the gestational origins of sex as a moderator of development. In accordance with the focus of this special issue, we examine evidence for a sex differential in vulnerability to prenatal and perinatal risks. Exposures evaluated include those present in the external environment (e.g., lead, pesticides), those introduced by maternal behaviors (e.g., alcohol, opioid use), and those resulting from an adverse intrauterine environment (e.g., preterm birth). We also provide current knowledge on the degree to which sex differences in fetal neurobehavioral development (i.e., cardiac and motor patterns) are present prior to birth. Also considered are contemporaneous and persistent sex of fetus effects on the pregnant woman. Converging evidence confirms that infant and early childhood developmental outcomes of male fetuses exposed to prenatal and perinatal adversities are more highly impaired than those of female fetuses. In certain circumstances, male fetuses are both more frequently exposed to early adversities and more affected by them when exposed than are female fetuses. The mechanisms through which biological sex imparts vulnerability or protection on the developing nervous system are largely unknown. We consider models that implicate variation in maturation, placental functioning, and the neuroendocrine milieu as potential contributors. Many studies use sex as a control variable, some analyze and report main effects for sex, but those that report interaction terms for sex are scare. As a result, the true scope of sex differences in vulnerability is unknown.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          7605074
          6087
          Neuroscience
          Neuroscience
          Neuroscience
          0306-4522
          1873-7544
          12 August 2015
          29 July 2015
          07 February 2017
          07 February 2018
          : 342
          : 4-20
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA
          Author notes
          CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Janet DiPietro, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Population and Family Health Sciences, 615 N. Wolfe St, W1033, Baltimore, MD 21205, (T)410.955.8536 (F)410.614.7871; jdipiet1@ 123456jhu.edu
          Article
          PMC4732938 PMC4732938 4732938 nihpa714512
          10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.068
          4732938
          26232714
          4482f518-e53f-4f86-a823-b5482df9b399
          History
          Categories
          Article

          sex differences,pregnancy,perinatal risk,prenatal exposures,fetal development,male vulnerability

          Comments

          Comment on this article