12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A robust multi-scale approach to quantitative susceptibility mapping

      research-article
      a , b , , c , d , e , c , d , b , e , f , g , a
      Neuroimage
      Academic Press
      Magnetic susceptibility, Quantitative MRI, Iron mapping, Venography, Variational regularisation, Laplacian pyramid, Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping, (QSM), Multi-Scale Dipole Inversion, (MSDI), nonlinear Morphology-Enabled Dipole Inversion, (nMEDI), High-Pass Susceptibility Mapping, (HPSM), MSDI-based Venography, (VenoMSDI), Macroscopic-Vessel Suppressed Susceptibility Mapping, (MVSSM), HPSM-based Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging, (HPSM-SWI), Maximum Susceptibility Projection, (MSP), spherical mean - value, (SMV), variable SMV, (vSMV), Laplacian boundary value, (LBV), normalised root-mean-square error, (RMSE), high-frequency error norm, (HFEN), structure dissimilarity index, (1-SSIM), mean absolute multi-ROI error, (ROI Error), Calculation of Susceptibility through Multiple Orientation Sampling, (COSMOS), prospective motion correction, (PMC)

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM), best known as a surrogate for tissue iron content, is becoming a highly relevant MRI contrast for monitoring cellular and vascular status in aging, addiction, traumatic brain injury and, in general, a wide range of neurological disorders. In this study we present a new Bayesian QSM algorithm, named Multi-Scale Dipole Inversion (MSDI), which builds on the nonlinear Morphology-Enabled Dipole Inversion (nMEDI) framework, incorporating three additional features: (i) improved implementation of Laplace's equation to reduce the influence of background fields through variable harmonic filtering and subsequent deconvolution, (ii) improved error control through dynamic phase-reliability compensation across spatial scales, and (iii) scalewise use of the morphological prior. More generally, this new pre-conditioned QSM formalism aims to reduce the impact of dipole-incompatible fields and measurement errors such as flow effects, poor signal-to-noise ratio or other data inconsistencies that can lead to streaking and shadowing artefacts. In terms of performance, MSDI is the first algorithm to rank in the top-10 for all metrics evaluated in the 2016 QSM Reconstruction Challenge. It also demonstrated lower variance than nMEDI and more stable behaviour in scan-rescan reproducibility experiments for different MRI acquisitions at 3 and 7 Tesla. In the present work, we also explored new forms of susceptibility MRI contrast making explicit use of the differential information across spatial scales. Specifically, we show MSDI-derived examples of: (i) enhanced anatomical detail with susceptibility inversions from short-range dipole fields (hereby referred to as High-Pass Susceptibility Mapping or HPSM), (ii) high specificity to venous-blood susceptibilities for highly regularised HPSM (making a case for MSDI-based Venography or VenoMSDI), (iii) improved tissue specificity (and possibly statistical conditioning) for Macroscopic-Vessel Suppressed Susceptibility Mapping (MVSSM), and (iv) high spatial specificity and definition for HPSM-based Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging (HPSM-SWI) and related intensity projections.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • MSDI mitigates QSM reconstruction artefacts through effective preconditioning.

          • MSDI leads to accurate and stable QSM across a broad range of imaging conditions.

          • Multi-scale information enables novel contrasts with greater tissue specificity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI

          New theoretical and practical concepts are presented for considerably enhancing the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by means of arrays of multiple receiver coils. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) is based on the fact that receiver sensitivity generally has an encoding effect complementary to Fourier preparation by linear field gradients. Thus, by using multiple receiver coils in parallel scan time in Fourier imaging can be considerably reduced. The problem of image reconstruction from sensitivity encoded data is formulated in a general fashion and solved for arbitrary coil configurations and k-space sampling patterns. Special attention is given to the currently most practical case, namely, sampling a common Cartesian grid with reduced density. For this case the feasibility of the proposed methods was verified both in vitro and in vivo. Scan time was reduced to one-half using a two-coil array in brain imaging. With an array of five coils double-oblique heart images were obtained in one-third of conventional scan time. Magn Reson Med 42:952-962, 1999. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.

            Objective methods for assessing perceptual image quality traditionally attempted to quantify the visibility of errors (differences) between a distorted image and a reference image using a variety of known properties of the human visual system. Under the assumption that human visual perception is highly adapted for extracting structural information from a scene, we introduce an alternative complementary framework for quality assessment based on the degradation of structural information. As a specific example of this concept, we develop a Structural Similarity Index and demonstrate its promise through a set of intuitive examples, as well as comparison to both subjective ratings and state-of-the-art objective methods on a database of images compressed with JPEG and JPEG2000.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI).

              Susceptibility differences between tissues can be utilized as a new type of contrast in MRI that is different from spin density, T1-, or T2-weighted imaging. Signals from substances with different magnetic susceptibilities compared to their neighboring tissue will become out of phase with these tissues at sufficiently long echo times (TEs). Thus, phase imaging offers a means of enhancing contrast in MRI. Specifically, the phase images themselves can provide excellent contrast between gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM), iron-laden tissues, venous blood vessels, and other tissues with susceptibilities that are different from the background tissue. Also, for the first time, projection phase images are shown to demonstrate tissue (vessel) continuity. In this work, the best approach for combining magnitude and phase images is discussed. The phase images are high-pass-filtered and then transformed to a special phase mask that varies in amplitude between zero and unity. This mask is multiplied a few times into the original magnitude image to create enhanced contrast between tissues with different susceptibilities. For this reason, this method is referred to as susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Mathematical arguments are presented to determine the number of phase mask multiplications that should take place. Examples are given for enhancing GM/WM contrast and water/fat contrast, identifying brain iron, and visualizing veins in the brain. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuroimage
                Neuroimage
                Neuroimage
                Academic Press
                1053-8119
                1095-9572
                1 December 2018
                December 2018
                : 183
                : 7-24
                Affiliations
                [a ]Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [b ]German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
                [c ]Department of Electrical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
                [d ]Biomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
                [e ]Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Experimental Physics, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
                [f ]Center for Behavioural Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany
                [g ]Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom. jac@ 123456cantab.net
                Article
                S1053-8119(18)30681-5
                10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.065
                6215336
                30075277
                4474c873-2bfa-40ec-b403-70701b3afa2f
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 February 2018
                : 29 June 2018
                : 29 July 2018
                Categories
                Article

                Neurosciences
                magnetic susceptibility,quantitative mri,iron mapping,venography,variational regularisation,laplacian pyramid,quantitative susceptibility mapping, (qsm),multi-scale dipole inversion, (msdi),nonlinear morphology-enabled dipole inversion, (nmedi),high-pass susceptibility mapping, (hpsm),msdi-based venography, (venomsdi),macroscopic-vessel suppressed susceptibility mapping, (mvssm),hpsm-based susceptibility-weighted imaging, (hpsm-swi),maximum susceptibility projection, (msp),spherical mean - value, (smv),variable smv, (vsmv),laplacian boundary value, (lbv),normalised root-mean-square error, (rmse),high-frequency error norm, (hfen),structure dissimilarity index, (1-ssim),mean absolute multi-roi error, (roi error),calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling, (cosmos),prospective motion correction, (pmc)

                Comments

                Comment on this article