14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New Insights in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: From Pathogenesis to Therapy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a highly heterogeneous disease due to increased destruction of autologous erythrocytes by autoantibodies with or without complement involvement. Other pathogenic mechanisms include hyper-activation of cellular immune effectors, cytokine dysregulation, and ineffective marrow compensation. AIHAs may be primary or associated with lymphoproliferative and autoimmune diseases, infections, immunodeficiencies, solid tumors, transplants, and drugs. The direct antiglobulin test is the cornerstone of diagnosis, allowing the distinction into warm forms (wAIHA), cold agglutinin disease (CAD), and other more rare forms. The immunologic mechanisms responsible for erythrocyte destruction in the various AIHAs are different and therefore therapy is quite dissimilar. In wAIHA, steroids represent first line therapy, followed by rituximab and splenectomy. Conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine) are now considered the third line. In CAD, steroids are useful only at high/unacceptable doses and splenectomy is uneffective. Rituximab is advised in first line therapy, followed by rituximab plus bendamustine and bortezomib. Several new drugs are under development including B-cell directed therapies (ibrutinib, venetoclax, parsaclisib) and inhibitors of complement (sutimlimab, pegcetacoplan), spleen tyrosine kinases (fostamatinib), or neonatal Fc receptor. Here, a comprehensive review of the main clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and pathogenic mechanisms of AIHA are provided, along with classic and new therapeutic approaches.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue.

          The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia associated with COVID‐19 infection

            Among patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (also known as COVID‐19), pneumonia, respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome are frequently encountered complications. 1 Although the pathophysiology underlying severe COVID‐19 remains poorly understood, accumulating evidence argues for hyperinflammatory syndrome causing fulminant and fatal cytokines release associated with disease severity and poor outcome. 2 However, the spectrum of complications is broader and includes among others various auto‐immune disorders such as autoimmune thrombocytopenia, Guillain–Barré and antiphospholipid syndrome. 3 , 4 , 5 In this report we describe seven patients from six French and Belgian Hospitals who developed a first episode of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) during a COVID‐19 infection. Patient characteristics are detailed in Table I. Briefly, median age was 62 years (range, 61–89 years), and all patients presented with risk factors for developing a severe form of COVID‐19 such as hypertension, diabetes and chronic renal failure. All patients had both a positive oropharyngeal swab for SARS‐CoV‐2 and typical images of COVID‐19 infection on chest computed tomography scans (25–75% extension). Three patients were admitted in an intensive care unit but only one required invasive ventilation. Treatment for COVID‐19 infection differed according to the standards of each centre. Thus, three patients received hydroxychloroquine, in association with azithromycin for two of them, and one patient received lopinavir and ritonavir. Table I Characteristics of seven patients with autoimmune haemolytic anaemia after the onset of COVID‐19. Patient Age Gender Comorbidity CT‐scan* Oropharyngeal swab (tested by PCR) Haemoglobin (g/l) Reticulocyte count (109/l) Lymphocyte count (109/l) Lactate dehydrogenase (U/l) Haptoglobin (g/l) DAT specificity Optimum temperature Day between COVID‐19 symptoms and AIHA Related pathology AIHA treatment Response #1 61 M Hypertension, chronic renal failure Moderate Positive 60 477 250 1000 100 g/l along with an increase of 20 g/l at least seven days after an infusion with red blood cells. Corticosteroid failure lead to rituximab injection in the third case (patient #6), and one responding patient is scheduled to receive rituximab because of a MZL clone (patient #3). At the time of last follow‐up, all patients were alive and had at least partly recovered from COVID‐19. To conclude, we report seven cases of warm and cold AIHA associated with COVID‐19 disease, all of them occurring after the beginning of the symptoms of the infection and within a timeframe compatible with that of the cytokine storm. Four out of the seven patients had indolent B lymphoid malignancy either already known or discovered because of the haemolytic episode. AIHA is a classical complication of both CLL and MZL, 6 , 7 and viral infections are known to trigger autoimmune cytopenias. 8 Whether the presence of an underlying malignant B lymphoid clone facilitated the onset of AIHA is unknown. Nonetheless, these observations argue for systematically investigating for the presence of a lymphoid clone in patients presenting with COVID‐19 infections and autoimmune cytopenias. Author contributions GL, AQ and FC designed the research study, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. MB, JS, CJ, DR, FM, AM, TB, GD and AD contributed to conception, patient enrollment and data collection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hemolytic anemia in adults: Recommendations from the First International Consensus Meeting

              Autoimmune hemolytic anemias (AIHAs) are rare and heterogeneous disorders characterized by the destruction of red blood cells through warm or cold antibodies. There is currently no licensed treatment for AIHA. Due to the paucity of clinical trials, recommendations on diagnosis and therapy have often been based on expert opinions and some national guidelines. Here we report the recommendations of the First International Consensus Group, who met with the aim to review currently available data and to provide standardized diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches as well as an overview of novel therapies. Exact diagnostic workup is important because symptoms, course of disease, and therapeutic management relate to the type of antibody involved. Monospecific direct antiglobulin test is considered mandatory in the diagnostic workup, and any causes of secondary AIHA have to be diagnosed. Corticosteroids remain first-line therapy for warm-AIHA, while the addition of rituximab should be considered early in severe cases and if no prompt response to steroids is achieved. Rituximab with or without bendamustine should be used in the first line for patients with cold agglutinin disease requiring therapy. We identified a need to establish an international AIHA network. Future recommendations should be based on prospective clinical trials whenever possible.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                27 November 2020
                December 2020
                : 9
                : 12
                : 3859
                Affiliations
                Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, 20100 Milan, Italy; anna.zaninoni@ 123456policlinico.mi.it (A.Z.); jurigiann@ 123456gmail.com (J.A.G.); bruno.fattizzo@ 123456unimi.it (B.F.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: wilma.barcellini@ 123456policlinico.mi.it ; Tel.: +39-025503-3256
                Article
                jcm-09-03859
                10.3390/jcm9123859
                7759854
                33261023
                44657402-3013-411e-83be-a748c16257ca
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 03 November 2020
                : 24 November 2020
                Categories
                Review

                warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia,cold agglutinin disease,complement,direct antiglobulin test,cytokines,therapies

                Comments

                Comment on this article