14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A DNA target-enrichment approach to detect mutations, copy number changes and immunoglobulin translocations in multiple myeloma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Genomic lesions are not investigated during routine diagnostic workup for multiple myeloma (MM). Cytogenetic studies are performed to assess prognosis but with limited impact on therapeutic decisions. Recently, several recurrently mutated genes have been described, but their clinical value remains to be defined. Therefore, clinical-grade strategies to investigate the genomic landscape of myeloma samples are needed to integrate new and old prognostic markers. We developed a target-enrichment strategy followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) to streamline simultaneous analysis of gene mutations, copy number changes and immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) translocations in MM in a high-throughput manner, and validated it in a panel of cell lines. We identified 548 likely oncogenic mutations in 182 genes. By integrating published data sets of NGS in MM, we retrieved a list of genes with significant relevance to myeloma and found that the mutational spectrum of primary samples and MM cell lines is partially overlapping. Gains and losses of chromosomes, chromosomal segments and gene loci were identified with accuracy comparable to conventional arrays, allowing identification of lesions with known prognostic significance. Furthermore, we identified IGH translocations with high positive and negative predictive value. Our approach could allow the identification of novel biomarkers with clinical relevance in myeloma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines 2013.

          Multiple myeloma remains an incurable neoplasm of plasma cells that affects more than 20,000 people annually in the United States. There has been a veritable revolution in this disease during the past decade, with dramatic improvements in our understanding of its pathogenesis, the development of several novel agents, and a concomitant doubling in overall survival. Because multiple myeloma is a complex and wide-ranging disorder, its management must be guided by disease- and patient-related factors; emerging as one of the most influential factors is risk stratification, primarily based on cytogenetic features. A risk-adapted approach provides optimal therapy to patients, ensuring intense therapy for aggressive disease and minimizing toxic effects, providing sufficient but less intense therapy for low-risk disease. This consensus statement reflects recommendations from more than 20 Mayo Clinic myeloma physicians, providing a practical approach for newly diagnosed patients with myeloma who are not enrolled in a clinical trial. Copyright © 2013 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            In silico prescription of anticancer drugs to cohorts of 28 tumor types reveals targeting opportunities.

            Large efforts dedicated to detect somatic alterations across tumor genomes/exomes are expected to produce significant improvements in precision cancer medicine. However, high inter-tumor heterogeneity is a major obstacle to developing and applying therapeutic targeted agents to treat most cancer patients. Here, we offer a comprehensive assessment of the scope of targeted therapeutic agents in a large pan-cancer cohort. We developed an in silico prescription strategy based on identification of the driver alterations in each tumor and their druggability options. Although relatively few tumors are tractable by approved agents following clinical guidelines (5.9%), up to 40.2% could benefit from different repurposing options, and up to 73.3% considering treatments currently under clinical investigation. We also identified 80 therapeutically targetable cancer genes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bortezomib plus dexamethasone induction improves outcome of patients with t(4;14) myeloma but not outcome of patients with del(17p).

              Cytogenetics is an important prognostic parameter in multiple myeloma (MM). Patients presenting with either t(4;14) or del(17p) are known to have a short event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Some preliminary data suggest that bortezomib is able to overcome these prognostic parameters. A series of 507 patients with newly diagnosed MM who received four cycles of bortezomib-dexamethasone induction therapy before high-dose melphalan were analyzed for both t(4;14) and del(17p). We found that both t(4;14) and del(17p) remain prognostic parameters, even in the context of bortezomib treatment. However, it is important to note that bortezomib significantly improves the prognosis (in terms of both EFS and OS) of patients with t(4;14), compared with patients treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone induction therapy. In contrast, no improvement was observed for del(17p) patients. Short-term bortezomib induction improves outcome of patients with t(4;14) but not the outcome of patients with del(17p). However, both abnormalities remain prognostic factors predicting both EFS and OS despite bortezomib induction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Blood Cancer J
                Blood Cancer J
                Blood Cancer Journal
                Nature Publishing Group
                2044-5385
                September 2016
                02 September 2016
                1 September 2016
                : 6
                : 9
                : e467
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute , Cambridge, UK
                [2 ]Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, University of Milan , Milan, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Pathology (UOC), University of Otago , Christchurch, New Zealand
                [4 ]Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia , Pavia, Italy
                [5 ]Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK
                [6 ]Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA
                [7 ]Unité de Genomique du Myelome, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rangueil , Toulouse, France
                [8 ]Centre de Recherche en Cancerologie de Toulouse, INSERM U1037 , Toulouse, France
                [9 ]Hematology Department, Centre de Recherche en Cancerologie Nantes-Angers Unité Mixte de Recherche INSERM 892–Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 6299 and Institut de Recherche Therapeutique de l'Université de Nantes , Nantes, France
                Author notes
                [* ]Division of Hematology, Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, University of Milan , Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milano, Italy. E-mail: Niccolo.bolli@ 123456unimi.it
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1018-5139
                Article
                bcj201672
                10.1038/bcj.2016.72
                5056967
                27588520
                43dda58c-8f4e-4f3f-8eba-5cab7773c503
                Copyright © 2016 The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 14 December 2015
                : 25 May 2016
                : 16 June 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article