35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      On the reproductive success of early-generation hatchery fish in the wild

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Large numbers of hatchery salmon spawn in wild populations each year. Hatchery fish with multiple generations of hatchery ancestry often have heritably lower reproductive success than wild fish and may reduce the fitness of an entire population. Whether this reduced fitness also occurs for hatchery fish created with local- and predominantly wild-origin parents remains controversial. Here, we review recent studies on the reproductive success of such ‘early-generation’ hatchery fish that spawn in the wild. Combining 51 estimates from six studies on four salmon species, we found that (i) early-generation hatchery fish averaged only half the reproductive success of their wild-origin counterparts when spawning in the wild, (ii) the reduction in reproductive success was more severe for males than for females, and (iii) all species showed reduced fitness due to hatchery rearing. We review commonalities among studies that point to possible mechanisms (e.g., environmental versus genetic effects). Furthermore, we illustrate that sample sizes typical of these studies result in low statistical power to detect fitness differences unless the differences are substantial. This review demonstrates that reduced fitness of early-generation hatchery fish may be a general phenomenon. Future research should focus on determining the causes of those fitness reductions and whether they lead to long-term reductions in the fitness of wild populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild.

          Captive breeding is used to supplement populations of many species that are declining in the wild. The suitability of and long-term species survival from such programs remain largely untested, however. We measured lifetime reproductive success of the first two generations of steelhead trout that were reared in captivity and bred in the wild after they were released. By reconstructing a three-generation pedigree with microsatellite markers, we show that genetic effects of domestication reduce subsequent reproductive capabilities by approximately 40% per captive-reared generation when fish are moved to natural environments. These results suggest that even a few generations of domestication may have negative effects on natural reproduction in the wild and that the repeated use of captive-reared parents to supplement wild populations should be carefully reconsidered.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A review of local adaptation in Salmonidac, with particular reference to Pacific and Atlantic salmon

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs.

              As wild environments are often inhospitable, many species have to be captive-bred to save them from extinction. In captivity, species adapt genetically to the captive environment and these genetic adaptations are overwhelmingly deleterious when populations are returned to wild environments. I review empirical evidence on (i) the genetic basis of adaptive changes in captivity, (ii) factors affecting the extent of genetic adaptation to captivity, and (iii) means for minimizing its deleterious impacts. Genetic adaptation to captivity is primarily due to rare alleles that in the wild were deleterious and partially recessive. The extent of adaptation to captivity depends upon selection intensity, genetic diversity, effective population size and number of generation in captivity, as predicted by quantitative genetic theory. Minimizing generations in captivity provides a highly effective means for minimizing genetic adaptation to captivity, but is not a practical option for most animal species. Population fragmentation and crossing replicate captive populations provide practical means for minimizing the deleterious effects of genetic adaptation to captivity upon populations reintroduced into the wild. Surprisingly, equalization of family sizes reduces the rate of genetic adaptation, but not the deleterious impacts upon reintroduced populations. Genetic adaptation to captivity is expected to have major effects on reintroduction success for species that have spent many generations in captivity. This issue deserves a much higher priority than it is currently receiving.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Evol Appl
                Evol Appl
                eva
                Evolutionary Applications
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1752-4571
                1752-4571
                September 2014
                09 July 2014
                : 7
                : 8
                : 883-896
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, USA
                [2 ]Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University West Lafayette, IN, USA
                [3 ]Conservation Biology Division, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center Seattle, WA, USA
                Author notes
                Mark R. Christie, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, 3029 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331-2914, USA. Tel.: (541) 231 0719; fax: (541) 737 0501; e-mail: christim@ 123456science.oregonstate.edu
                Article
                10.1111/eva.12183
                4211718
                25469167
                43ab9490-65b4-43be-8aa9-99d62d863eda
                © 2014 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 06 February 2014
                : 20 May 2014
                Categories
                Reviews and Synthesis

                Evolutionary Biology
                captive breeding,domestication,fitness,hatcheries,relative reproductive success,salmon.

                Comments

                Comment on this article