7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The causal role of the bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal cortices on emotion regulation of social feedback

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The ventrolateral prefrontal cortices (VLPFC) are crucial regions involved in voluntary emotion regulation. However, the lateralization of the VLPFC in downregulating negative emotions remains unclear; and whether the causal role of the VLPFC is generalizable to upregulating positive emotions is unexplored. This study used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the causal relationship between the left/right VLPFC and social emotion reappraisal. One hundred and twenty participants were randomly assigned to either active (left and right VLPFC groups, n = 40/40) or sham (vertex, n = 40) TMS groups. Participants were instructed to passively receive social feedback or use reappraisal strategies to positively regulate their emotions. While the subjective emotional rating showed that the bilateral VLPFC facilitated the reappraisal success, the electrophysiological measure of the late positive potential (LPP) demonstrated a more critical role of the right VLPFC on social pain relief (decreased LPP amplitudes) and social reward magnification (enhanced LPP amplitudes). In addition, the influence of emotion regulation on social evaluation was found to be mediated by the memory of social feedback, indicating the importance of memory in social behavioral shaping. These findings suggest clinical protocols for the rehabilitation of emotion‐regulatory function in patients with affective and social disorders.

          Abstract

          Previous studies of our lab have revealed that the ventrolateral prefrontal cortices (VLPFC) are crucial regions involved in voluntary emotion regulation. However, the lateralization of the VLPFC (left or right) as well as the generalizability of its critical role to upregulating positive emotions is largely unclear. To answer these questions, this study used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) together with event‐related potential techniques to examine the causal relationship between the left/right VLPFC and emotion regulation. It was found that the right VLPFC, compared to its right counterpart, significantly facilitated downregulating negative and upregulating positive emotions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references95

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion.

          A neuroimaging study examined the neural correlates of social exclusion and tested the hypothesis that the brain bases of social pain are similar to those of physical pain. Participants were scanned while playing a virtual ball-tossing game in which they were ultimately excluded. Paralleling results from physical pain studies, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) was more active during exclusion than during inclusion and correlated positively with self-reported distress. Right ventral prefrontal cortex (RVPFC) was active during exclusion and correlated negatively with self-reported distress. ACC changes mediated the RVPFC-distress correlation, suggesting that RVPFC regulates the distress of social exclusion by disrupting ACC activity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

            Five studies tested two general hypotheses: Individuals differ in their use of emotion regulation strategies such as reappraisal and suppression, and these individual differences have implications for affect, well-being, and social relationships. Study 1 presents new measures of the habitual use of reappraisal and suppression. Study 2 examines convergent and discriminant validity. Study 3 shows that reappraisers experience and express greater positive emotion and lesser negative emotion, whereas suppressors experience and express lesser positive emotion, yet experience greater negative emotion. Study 4 indicates that using reappraisal is associated with better interpersonal functioning, whereas using suppression is associated with worse interpersonal functioning. Study 5 shows that using reappraisal is related positively to well-being, whereas using suppression is related negatively.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The neural bases of emotion regulation: reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion.

              Emotion regulation strategies are thought to differ in when and how they influence the emotion-generative process. However, no study to date has directly probed the neural bases of two contrasting (e.g., cognitive versus behavioral) emotion regulation strategies. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine cognitive reappraisal (a cognitive strategy thought to have its impact early in the emotion-generative process) and expressive suppression (a behavioral strategy thought to have its impact later in the emotion-generative process). Seventeen women viewed 15 sec neutral and negative emotion-eliciting films under four conditions--watch-neutral, watch-negative, reappraise-negative, and suppress-negative--while providing emotion experience ratings and having their facial expressions videotaped. Reappraisal resulted in early (0-4.5 sec) prefrontal cortex (PFC) responses, decreased negative emotion experience, and decreased amygdala and insular responses. Suppression produced late (10.5-15 sec) PFC responses, decreased negative emotion behavior and experience, but increased amygdala and insular responses. These findings demonstrate the differential efficacy of reappraisal and suppression on emotional experience, facial behavior, and neural response and highlight intriguing differences in the temporal dynamics of these two emotion regulation strategies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                zhangdd05@gmail.com
                Journal
                Hum Brain Mapp
                Hum Brain Mapp
                10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193
                HBM
                Human Brain Mapping
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                1065-9471
                1097-0193
                09 March 2022
                15 June 2022
                : 43
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1002/hbm.v43.9 )
                : 2898-2910
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University Chengdu China
                [ 2 ] School of Psychology Shenzhen University Shenzhen China
                [ 3 ] Department of Psychology The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
                [ 4 ] Shenzhen Yingchi Technology Co., Ltd Shenzhen China
                [ 5 ] The State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
                [ 6 ] Shenzhen‐Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science Shenzhen China
                [ 7 ] Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Center Shenzhen University Shenzhen China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Dandan Zhang, Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China.

                Email: zhangdd05@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-7114
                Article
                HBM25824
                10.1002/hbm.25824
                9120569
                35261115
                43ab475e-a64f-4087-9b3f-b8f4e0463c00
                © 2022 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 28 January 2022
                : 26 November 2021
                : 21 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 3, Pages: 13, Words: 12141
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China , doi 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 31970980
                Award ID: 31920103009
                Funded by: Shenzhen‐Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science
                Award ID: 2021SHIBS0003
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 15, 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.6 mode:remove_FC converted:20.05.2022

                Neurology
                emotion regulation,reappraisal,social feedback,transcranial magnetic stimulation,ventrolateral prefrontal cortex

                Comments

                Comment on this article