33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incidence of intrapartum stillbirth and associated risk factors in tertiary care setting of Nepal: a case-control study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Each year, 1.2 million intrapartum stillbirths occur globally. In Nepal, about 50 % of the total number of stillbirths occur during the intrapartum period. An understanding of the risk factors associated with intrapartum stillbirth will facilitate the development of preventative strategies to reduce the associated burden of death. This study was conducted in a tertiary-care setting with the aim to identify risk factors associated with intrapartum stillbirth.

          Methods

          A case–control study was completed from July 2012 to September 2013. All women who had an intrapartum stillbirth during the study period were included as cases, and 20 % of women with live births were randomly selected upon admission to create the referent population. Relevant information was retrieved from clinical records for case and referent women. In addition, interviews were completed with each woman to determine their demographic and obstetric history.

          Results

          During the study period, 4,476 women were enrolled as referents and 136 women had intrapartum stillbirths. The following factors were found to be associated with an increased risk for intrapartum stillbirth: poor familial wealth quintile (Adj OR 1.8, 95 % CI-1.1–3.4); less maternal education (Adj OR, 3.2 95 % CI-1.8–5.5); lack of antenatal care (Adj OR, 4.8 95 % CI 3.2–7.2); antepartum hemorrhage (Adj OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.1–4.2); multiple births (Adj. OR-3.0, 95 % CI- 1.9–5.4); obstetric complication during labor (Adj. OR 4.5, 95 % CI-2.9–6.9); lack of fetal heart rate monitoring per protocol (Adj. OR-1.9, 95 % CI 1.5–2.4); lack of partogram use (Adj. OR-2.1, 95 % CI 1.1–4.1); small-for-gestational age (Adj. OR-1.8, 95 % CI-1.2–1.7); preterm birth (Adj. OR-5.4, 95 % CI 3.5–8.2); and being born preterm with a small-for-gestational age (Adj. OR-9.0, 95 % CI 7.3–15.5).

          Conclusion

          Being born preterm with a small-for-gestational age was associated with the highest risk for intrapartum stillbirth. Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and partogram use are preventable risk factors associated with intrapartum stillbirth; by increasing adherence to these interventions the risk of intrapartum stillbirth can be reduced. The association of the lack of appropriate antenatal care with intrapartum stillbirth indicates that quality antenatal care may improve fetal health and outcomes.

          Trial registration

          ISRCTN97846009

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data--or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India.

          Using data from India, we estimate the relationship between household wealth and children's school enrollment. We proxy wealth by constructing a linear index from asset ownership indicators, using principal-components analysis to derive weights. In Indian data this index is robust to the assets included, and produces internally coherent results. State-level results correspond well to independent data on per capita output and poverty. To validate the method and to show that the asset index predicts enrollments as accurately as expenditures, or more so, we use data sets from Indonesia, Pakistan, and Nepal that contain information on both expenditures and assets. The results show large, variable wealth gaps in children's enrollment across Indian states. On average a "rich" child is 31 percentage points more likely to be enrolled than a "poor" child, but this gap varies from only 4.6 percentage points in Kerala to 38.2 in Uttar Pradesh and 42.6 in Bihar.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            No cry at birth: global estimates of intrapartum stillbirths and intrapartum-related neonatal deaths.

            Fewer than 3% of 4 million annual neonatal deaths occur in countries with reliable vital registration (VR) data. Global estimates for asphyxia-related neonatal deaths vary from 0.7 to 1.2 million. Estimates for intrapartum stillbirths are not available. We aimed to estimate the numbers of intrapartum-related neonatal deaths and intrapartum stillbirths in the year 2000. Sources of data on neonatal death included: vital registration (VR) data on neonatal death from countries with full (> 90%) VR coverage (48 countries, n = 97,297); studies identified through literature searches (> 4000 abstracts) and meeting inclusion criteria (46 populations, 30 countries, n = 12,355). A regression model was fitted to cause-specific proportionate mortality data from VR and the literature. Predicted cause-specific proportions were applied to the number of neonatal deaths by country, and summed to a global total. Intrapartum stillbirths were estimated using median cause-specific mortality rate by country (73 populations, 52 countries, n = 46,779) or the subregional median in the absence of country data. Intrapartum-related neonatal deaths were estimated at 0.904 million (uncertainty 0.65-1.17), equivalent to 23% of the global total of 4 million neonatal deaths. Country-level model predictions compared well with population-based data sets not included in the input data. An estimated 1.02 million intrapartum stillbirths (0.66-1.48 million) occur annually, comprising 26% of global stillbirths. Intrapartum-related neonatal deaths account for almost 10% of deaths in children aged under 5 years. Intrapartum stillbirths are a huge and invisible problem, but are potentially preventable. Programmatic attention and improved information are required.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stillbirths: why they matter.

              In this first paper of The Lancet's Stillbirths Series we explore the present status of stillbirths in the world-from global health policy to a survey of community perceptions in 135 countries. Our findings highlight the need for a strong call for action. In times of global focus on motherhood, the mother's own aspiration of a liveborn baby is not recognised on the world's health agenda. Millions of deaths are not counted; stillbirths are not in the Global Burden of Disease, nor in disability-adjusted life-years lost, and they are not part of the UN Millennium Development Goals. The grief of mothers might be aggravated by social stigma, blame, and marginalisation in regions where most deaths occur. Most stillborn babies are disposed of without any recognition or ritual, such as naming, funeral rites, or the mother holding or dressing the baby. Beliefs in the mother's sins and evil spirits as causes of stillbirth are rife, and stillbirth is widely believed to be a natural selection of babies never meant to live. Stillbirth prevention is closely linked with prevention of maternal and neonatal deaths. Knowledge of causes and feasible solutions for prevention is key to health professionals' priorities, to which this Stillbirths Series paper aims to contribute. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                9779841453806 , aaashis7@yahoo.com , http://www.kbh.uu.se/imch
                johan.wrammert@kbh.uu.se
                uwe.ewald@kbh.uu.se
                robclarkmd@outlook.com
                drjgautam48@gmail.com
                gehanath@gmail.com
                kedarbaral@pahs.edu.np
                mats.malqvist@kbh.uu.se
                Journal
                Reprod Health
                Reprod Health
                Reproductive Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1742-4755
                31 August 2016
                31 August 2016
                2016
                : 13
                : 1
                : 103
                Affiliations
                [1 ]International Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
                [2 ]United Nation’s Children’s Fund, Nepal Country Office, UN House, Pulchowk, Nepal
                [3 ]Latter-day Saint Charities, Salt Lake City, UT USA
                [4 ]Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital, Thapathali, Nepal
                [5 ]Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0541-4486
                Article
                226
                10.1186/s12978-016-0226-9
                5007702
                27581467
                43aab650-42dd-42c5-a1e4-9387a9abf587
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 27 September 2015
                : 23 August 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004102, Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine;
                Funded by: Swedish Society of Medicine
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                Obstetrics & Gynecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article