2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Increasing Exclusive Nursery Care of Late Preterm and Low Birth Weight Infants

      , , , , ,
      Hospital Pediatrics
      American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

          Late preterm (LPT) and low birth weight (LBW) infants are populations at increased risk for NICU admission, partly due to feeding-related conditions. This study was aimed to increase the percentage of LPT and LBW infants receiving exclusive nursery care using quality improvement methodologies.

          METHODS

          A multidisciplinary team implemented interventions at a single academic center. Included infants were 35 to 36 weeks gestational age and term infants with birth weights <2500 g admitted from the delivery room to the nursery. Drivers of change included feeding protocol, knowledge, and care standardization. We used statistical process control charts to track data over time. The primary outcome was the percentage of infants receiving exclusive nursery care. Secondary outcomes included rates of hypoglycemia, phototherapy, and average weight loss. Balancing measures were exclusive breast milk feeding rates and length of stay.

          RESULTS

          Included infants totaled 1336. The percentage of LPT and LBW infants receiving exclusive nursery care increased from 83.9% to 88.8% with special cause variation starting 1 month into the postintervention period. Reduction in neonatal hypoglycemia, 51.7% to 45.1%, coincided. Among infants receiving exclusive nursery care, phototherapy, weight loss, exclusive breast milk feeding, and length of stay had no special cause variation.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Interventions involving a nursery feeding protocol, knowledge, and standardization of care for LPT and LBW infants were associated with increased exclusive nursery care (4.9%) and reduced rates of neonatal hypoglycemia (6.6%) without adverse effects. This quality initiative allowed for the preservation of the mother-infant dyad using high-value care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process

          Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Postnatal glucose homeostasis in late-preterm and term infants.

            , David Adamkin (2011)
            This report provides a practical guide and algorithm for the screening and subsequent management of neonatal hypoglycemia. Current evidence does not support a specific concentration of glucose that can discriminate normal from abnormal or can potentially result in acute or chronic irreversible neurologic damage. Early identification of the at-risk infant and institution of prophylactic measures to prevent neonatal hypoglycemia are recommended as a pragmatic approach despite the absence of a consistent definition of hypoglycemia in the literature.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical outcomes of near-term infants.

              To test the hypothesis that near-term infants have more medical problems after birth than full-term infants and that hospital stays might be prolonged and costs increased. Electronic medical record database sorting was conducted of 7474 neonatal records and subset analyses of near-term (n = 120) and full-term (n = 125) neonatal records. Cost information was accessed. Length of hospital stay, Apgar scores, clinical diagnoses (temperature instability, jaundice, hypoglycemia, suspicion of sepsis, apnea and bradycardia, respiratory distress), treatment with an intravenous infusion, delay in discharge to home, and hospital costs were assessed. Data from 90 near-term and 95 full-term infants were analyzed. Median length of stay was similar for near-term and full-term infants, but wide variations in hospital stay were documented for near-term infants after both vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Near-term and full-term infants had comparable 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores. Nearly all clinical outcomes analyzed differed significantly between near-term and full-term neonates: temperature instability, hypoglycemia, respiratory distress, and jaundice. Near-term infants were evaluated for possible sepsis more frequently than full-term infants (36.7% vs 12.6%; odds ratio: 3.97) and more often received intravenous infusions. Cost analysis revealed a relative increase in total costs for near-term infants of 2.93 (mean) and 1.39 (median), resulting in a cost difference of 2630 dollars (mean) and 429 dollars (median) per near-term infant. Near-term infants had significantly more medical problems and increased hospital costs compared with contemporaneous full-term infants. Near-term infants may represent an unrecognized at-risk neonatal population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hospital Pediatrics
                American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
                2154-1663
                2154-1671
                November 01 2023
                October 11 2023
                November 01 2023
                October 11 2023
                : 13
                : 11
                : 992-1000
                Article
                10.1542/hpeds.2022-007037
                43657c36-74a7-4fa0-936e-ee218ac03c38
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article