9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Critical factors influencing visitor emotions: analysis of “restorativeness” in urban park visits in Fuzhou, China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To date, a comprehensive analysis of urban green space (UGS) visitors’ emotional remains largely unexplored. In this study, we focus on how UGS environmental preferences, restorativeness, other physical factors (sound, air, and thermal environments), and individual characteristics affecting visitor emotions. Such a comprehensive analysis would allow relevant practitioners to check the environmental quality of UGSs and improve certain conditions to promote visitor emotions.

          Methods

          A total of 904 questionnaire responses with concurrently monitored physical factors were analyzed by independent sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA and path analysis.

          Results

          The thermal evaluation had the largest impact on positive emotions (β = 0.474), followed by perceived restorativeness (β = 0.297), which had β values of −0.120 and −0.158, respectively, on negative emotions. Air evaluation was more effective for increasing positive emotions (β = 0.293) than reducing negative emotions (β = −0.115). Sound evaluation also had similar results (β = 0.330 vs. β = −0.080). Environmental preference significantly influenced only positive emotions (β = 0.181) but could still indirectly impact negative emotions. Moreover, objective physical factors can indirectly affect visitors’ emotions by enhancing their evaluations..

          Conclusion

          The influence of different UGS environmental factors on visitors’ emotions vary, as does their impacts on positive versus negative emotions. Positive emotions were generally more affected than negative emotions by UGS. Visitor emotions were mainly influenced by physical and psychological factors. Corresponding suggestions are proposed for UGS design and management in this study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references111

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.

          In recent studies of the structure of affect, positive and negative affect have consistently emerged as two dominant and relatively independent dimensions. A number of mood scales have been created to measure these factors; however, many existing measures are inadequate, showing low reliability or poor convergent or discriminant validity. To fill the need for reliable and valid Positive Affect and Negative Affect scales that are also brief and easy to administer, we developed two 10-item mood scales that comprise the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The scales are shown to be highly internally consistent, largely uncorrelated, and stable at appropriate levels over a 2-month time period. Normative data and factorial and external evidence of convergent and discriminant validity for the scales are also presented.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Longitudinal Study on the Mental Health of General Population during the COVID-19 Epidemic in China

            Highlights • A significant reduction in psychological impact 4 weeks after COVID outbreak. • The mean scores of respondents in both surveys were above PTSD cut-offs. • Female gender, physical symptoms associated with a higher psychological impact. • Hand hygiene, mask-wearing & confidence in doctors reduced psychological impact. • Online trauma-focused psychotherapy may be helpful to public during COVID-19.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1599467/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2072033/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2510592/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                21 November 2023
                2023
                : 11
                : 1286518
                Affiliations
                [1] 1College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University , Fuzhou, China
                [2] 2Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo , Tokyo, Japan
                [3] 3College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University , Fuzhou, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Paolo Lauriola, International Society Doctors for the Environment (ISDE), Italy

                Reviewed by: Linjing Deng, Jiangsu University, China; Pierangela Piras, ISDE - Medici per l'Ambiente - Italia, Italy

                *Correspondence: Jian Liu, fjliujian@ 123456fafu.edu.cn
                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2023.1286518
                10703382
                38074738
                4334db3d-da01-4df1-87df-6a203f8b6f84
                Copyright © 2023 Wu, Liu, Quevedo, Cheng, Yu and Kohsaka.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 04 September 2023
                : 31 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 10, Equations: 0, References: 116, Pages: 18, Words: 13955
                Funding
                Funded by: Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
                Award ID: 324-1122yb085
                Funded by: China Scholarship Council, doi 10.13039/501100004543;
                Award ID: 202208350064
                Funded by: JSPS KAKENHI
                Award ID: JP22H03852
                Award ID: JP22H00390
                Award ID: JP21K18456
                Award ID: JP17K02105
                Funded by: JST RISTEX
                Award ID: JPMJRX20B3
                Funded by: JST
                Award ID: JPMJPF2110
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (324-1122yb085); China Scholarship Council (202208350064); JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP22H03852, JP22H00390, JP21K18456, JP23KK0198, JP23H03605, JP23H01584, and JP17K02105; JST RISTEX Grant Number JPMJRX20B3; and JST Grant Number JPMJPF2110.
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Environmental health and Exposome

                urban green space,emotional health,environmental quality,preference,restorative environment

                Comments

                Comment on this article