24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recidivism Risk and Criminogenic Needs of Individuals Who Perpetrated Intimate Partner Sexual Violence Offenses

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite the common occurrence of sexual violence in intimate partner violence (IPV) and its association with increased risk of intimate partner homicide, intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV) is often overlooked in the literature. As a result, little is known about risk factors that may be unique to IPSV perpetrators. The present study utilizes a police-reported sample to compare the risk/need profiles of 36 IPSV and 36 IPV perpetrators by creating theoretically meaningful risk composites as proxies for a number of the central eight risk/need areas posited by Andrews and Bonta (2010, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362). Results indicate that the risk/need profiles of the IPSV group are more severe than the IPV group, with higher scores in measures of substance abuse, relationship instability, sexual aggression, and mental health concerns. Potential implications for IPSV assessment and intervention at the level of policing and correctional programming are discussed, including the need for higher intensity treatments and the treatment of non-criminogenic needs.

          Abstract

          • Perpetrators of IPSV have more severe risk/need profiles than those who commit IPV.

          • Perpetrators of IPSV also demonstrate more mental health concerns than those who commit IPV.

          • Higher intensity treatment programs for perpetrators of IPSV may be warranted.

          • Future research may benefit from distinguishing perpetrators of IPSV and IPV.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A power primer.

          One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material. A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is provided here. Effect-size indexes and conventional values for these are given for operationally defined small, medium, and large effects. The sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests: (a) the difference between independent means, (b) the significance of a product-moment correlation, (c) the difference between independent rs, (d) the sign test, (e) the difference between independent proportions, (f) chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables, (g) one-way analysis of variance, and (h) the significance of a multiple or multiple partial correlation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies.

            A meta-analysis of 82 recidivism studies (1,620 findings from 29,450 sexual offenders) identified deviant sexual preferences and antisocial orientation as the major predictors of sexual recidivism for both adult and adolescent sexual offenders. Antisocial orientation was the major predictor of violent recidivism and general (any) recidivism. The review also identified some dynamic risk factors that have the potential of being useful treatment targets (e.g., sexual preoccupations, general self-regulation problems). Many of the variables commonly addressed in sex offender treatment programs (e.g., psychological distress, denial of sex crime, victim empathy, stated motivation for treatment) had little or no relationship with sexual or violent recidivism.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence.

              A systematic review of risk factors for intimate partner violence was conducted. Inclusion criteria included publication in a peer-reviewed journal, a representative community sample or a clinical sample with a control-group comparison, a response rate of at least 50%, use of a physical or sexual violence outcome measure, and control of confounding factors in the analyses. A total of 228 articles were included (170 articles with adult and 58 with adolescent samples). Organized by levels of a dynamic developmental systems perspective, risk factors included: (a) contextual characteristics of partners (demographic, neighborhood, community and school factors), (b) developmental characteristics and behaviors of the partners (e.g., family, peer, psychological/behavioral, and cognitive factors), and (c) relationship influences and interactional patterns. Comparisons to a prior review highlight developments in the field in the past 10 years. Recommendations for intervention and policy along with future directions for intimate partner violence (IPV) risk factor research are presented.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                SOTRAP
                Sex Offending
                Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention
                Sex. Offending
                PsychOpen
                2699-8440
                22 July 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 1
                : e3713
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, SK, Canada
                [b ]Department of Psychology, MacEwan University , Edmonton, AB, Canada
                [3]Centre for Criminology (Kriminologische Zentralstelle – KrimZ), Wiesbaden, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, Arts 154, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5A5. brandon.sparks@ 123456usask.ca
                Article
                sotrap.3713
                10.5964/sotrap.3713
                4307a650-3aaa-4ed8-919d-a49456eb0fc1
                Copyright @ 2020

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 February 2020
                : 24 April 2020
                Categories
                Research Article

                Psychology
                ODARA,intimate partner violence,SARA,criminogenic needs,risk factors,intimate partner sexual violence

                Comments

                Comment on this article