32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Customized Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Adult Cataract in Iran

      other
      , MD 1 , , MD 1 , , MD 1 , , MS 1 , , MD 1 , , MD 2 , 3 , , MD 1 , , MD, PhD 4 , , MD 1 , , MD 1 , , MD 5 , , MD 6 , , MD 7 , , MD 8 , , MD 7 , , MD 8 , , MD 6 , , MD 6 , , MD 9 , , MD 8 , , MD 9 , , MD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD 13
      Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
      Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
      Adult, Cataract, Iran, Practice Guideline

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          To customize clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for cataract management in the Iranian population.

          Methods:

          First, four CPGs (American Academy of Ophthalmology 2006 and 2011, Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2010, and Canadian Ophthalmological Society 2008) were selected from a number of available CPGs in the literature for cataract management. All recommendations of these guidelines, together with their references, were studied. Each recommendation was summarized in 4 tables. The first table showed the recommendation itself in clinical question components format along with its level of evidence. The second table contained structured abstracts of supporting articles related to the clinical question with their levels of evidence. The third table included the customized recommendation of the internal group respecting its clinical advantage, cost, and complications. In the fourth table, the internal group their recommendations from 1 to 9 based on the customizing capability of the recommendation (applicability, acceptability, external validity). Finally, customized recommendations were sent one month prior to a consensus session to faculty members of all universities across the country asking for their comments on recommendations.

          Results:

          The agreed recommendations were accepted as conclusive while those with no agreement were discussed at the consensus session. Finally, all customized recommendations were codified as 80 recommendations along with their sources and levels of evidence for the Iranian population.

          Conclusion:

          Customization of CPGs for management of adult cataract for the Iranian population seems to be useful for standardization of referral, diagnosis and treatment of patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references181

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002.

          This paper presents estimates of the prevalence of visual impairment and its causes in 2002, based on the best available evidence derived from recent studies. Estimates were determined from data on low vision and blindness as defined in the International statistical classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death, 10th revision. The number of people with visual impairment worldwide in 2002 was in excess of 161 million, of whom about 37 million were blind. The burden of visual impairment is not distributed uniformly throughout the world: the least developed regions carry the largest share. Visual impairment is also unequally distributed across age groups, being largely confined to adults 50 years of age and older. A distribution imbalance is also found with regard to gender throughout the world: females have a significantly higher risk of having visual impairment than males. Notwithstanding the progress in surgical intervention that has been made in many countries over the last few decades, cataract remains the leading cause of visual impairment in all regions of the world, except in the most developed countries. Other major causes of visual impairment are, in order of importance, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and trachoma.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community

            Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes.

              Adverse events in patients who have undergone surgery constitute a large proportion of iatrogenic illnesses. Most surgical safety interventions have focused on the operating room. Since more than half of all surgical errors occur outside the operating room, it is likely that a more substantial improvement in outcomes can be achieved by targeting the entire surgical pathway. We examined the effects on patient outcomes of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary surgical safety checklist, including items such as medication, marking of the operative side, and use of postoperative instructions. The checklist was implemented in six hospitals with high standards of care. All complications occurring during admission were documented prospectively. We compared the rate of complications during a baseline period of 3 months with the rate during a 3-month period after implementation of the checklist, while accounting for potential confounders. Similar data were collected from a control group of five hospitals. In a comparison of 3760 patients observed before implementation of the checklist with 3820 patients observed after implementation, the total number of complications per 100 patients decreased from 27.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.9 to 28.7) to 16.7 (95% CI, 15.6 to 17.9), for an absolute risk reduction of 10.6 (95% CI, 8.7 to 12.4). The proportion of patients with one or more complications decreased from 15.4% to 10.6% (P<0.001). In-hospital mortality decreased from 1.5% (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0) to 0.8% (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.1), for an absolute risk reduction of 0.7 percentage points (95% CI, 0.2 to 1.2). Outcomes did not change in the control hospitals. Implementation of this comprehensive checklist was associated with a reduction in surgical complications and mortality in hospitals with a high standard of care. (Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR1943.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Ophthalmic Vis Res
                J Ophthalmic Vis Res
                JOVR
                Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                2008-2010
                2008-322X
                Oct-Dec 2015
                : 10
                : 4
                : 445-460
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [2 ] Office for Healthcare Standards, Deputy of Curative Affairs, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
                [3 ] Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Education, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [4 ] Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [5 ] Department of Ophthalmology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [6 ] Department of Ophthalmology, Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [7 ] Department of Ophthalmology, Rassoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [8 ] Department of Ophthalmology, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [9 ] Department of Ophthalmology, Imam Hussein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [10 ] Department of Ophthalmology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
                [11 ] Department of Ophthalmology, Al-Zahra Eye Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
                [12 ] Department of Ophthalmology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [13 ] Basir Eye Safety Research Center, Basir Eye Clinic, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Mohammad Ali Javadi, MD. Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, No. 23, Paidarfard St., Boostan 9 St., Pasdaran Ave., Tehran 16666, Iran. E-mail: ma_javadi@ 123456yahoo.com
                Sare Safi, MS. Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, No. 23, Paidarfard St., Boostan 9 St., Pasdaran Ave., Tehran 16666, Iran. E-mail: sare.safi@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                JOVR-10-445
                10.4103/2008-322X.176913
                4795396
                27051491
                42dd08d8-e11b-4e5e-98c0-adcd7262efe1
                Copyright: © Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 10 August 2015
                : 12 September 2015
                Categories
                Clinical Practice Guidelines

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                adult,cataract,iran,practice guideline
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                adult, cataract, iran, practice guideline

                Comments

                Comment on this article