7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Insufficient task-outcome association promotes task procrastination through a decrease of hippocampal-striatal interaction

      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 4
      Human Brain Mapping
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Theories on procrastination propose that associating tasks with higher valued incentive outcomes results in less task procrastination. However, it remains unknown how representation of incentive outcomes and task‐outcome association are mediated by the human brain. Using event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging, we scanned human participants while they were thinking about both tasks and the incentive outcomes each task can yield in an unconstrained way. Results showed that tasks that are more likely to be procrastinated are associated with less value in incentive outcomes. Interestingly, procrastination was more likely if it was more difficult for participants to associate a task with its valued incentives when thinking about the task (i.e., the decreased task‐outcome association). On the neural level, higher value of rewarding outcomes was correlated with increased putamen activations, which further negatively predicted task procrastination. On the other hand, when participants were associating tasks with the incentive outcomes, the decreasing task‐outcome association corresponded to decreasing activation in putamen, and a decreasing hippocampus‐putamen coupling which further mediated the effect of the insufficient task‐outcome association on procrastination. In particular, the current findings show that procrastination is more likely when people are less able to associate tasks with highly valued incentives, which is accompanied by reduced hippocampal–striatal interactions during task construction.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure.

              Procrastination is a prevalent and pernicious form of self-regulatory failure that is not entirely understood. Hence, the relevant conceptual, theoretical, and empirical work is reviewed, drawing upon correlational, experimental, and qualitative findings. A meta-analysis of procrastination's possible causes and effects, based on 691 correlations, reveals that neuroticism, rebelliousness, and sensation seeking show only a weak connection. Strong and consistent predictors of procrastination were task aversiveness, task delay, self-efficacy, and impulsiveness, as well as conscientiousness and its facets of self-control, distractibility, organization, and achievement motivation. These effects prove consistent with temporal motivation theory, an integrative hybrid of expectancy theory and hyperbolic discounting. Continued research into procrastination should not be delayed, especially because its prevalence appears to be growing. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Human Brain Mapping
                Hum Brain Mapp
                Wiley
                10659471
                February 01 2019
                February 01 2019
                September 25 2018
                : 40
                : 2
                : 597-607
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Psychology; Southwest University; Chongqing China
                [2 ]The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation, Ministry of Education; University of Electronic Science and Technology of China; Chengdu Sichuan China
                [3 ]School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science; South China Normal University; Guangzhou China
                [4 ]Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality; Ministry of Education; Chongqing China
                Article
                10.1002/hbm.24397
                6865818
                30251755
                42bb5c34-ea94-4b23-b83c-7e6f7cd8fe4f
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article