32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Immune response to the hepatitis B antigen in the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine, and co-administration with pneumococcal conjugate and rotavirus vaccines in African children: A randomized controlled trial

      research-article
      a , b , c , a , b , a , b , c , a , b , c , a , b , c , a , b , c , a , b , c , a , b , c , a , b , c , c , a , b
      Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
      Taylor & Francis
      co-administration, hepatitis B, immunogenicity, malaria, plasmodium falciparum, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, RTS,S, vaccine

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          The RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine ( Mosquirix) reduces the incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and is intended for routine administration to infants in Sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV; Synflorix) and human rotavirus vaccine (HRV; Rotarix) when co-administered with RTS,S/AS01 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01345240) in African infants. 705 healthy infants aged 8–12 weeks were randomized to receive three doses of either RTS,S/AS01 or licensed hepatitis B (HBV; Engerix B) vaccine (control) co-administered with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis- Haemophilus influenzae type-b-conjugate vaccine (DTaP/Hib) and trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine at 8–12-16 weeks of age, because DTaP/Hib was not indicated before 8 weeks of age. The vaccination schedule can still be considered broadly applicable because it was within the age range recommended for EPI vaccination. PHiD-CV or HRV were either administered together with the study vaccines, or after a 2-week interval. Booster doses of PHiD-CV and DTaP/Hib were administered at age 18 months.

          Non-inferiority of anti-HBV surface antigen antibody seroprotection rates following co-administration with RTS,S/AS01 was demonstrated compared to the control group (primary objective). Pre-specified non-inferiority criteria were reached for PHiD-CV (for 9/10 vaccine serotypes), HRV, and aP antigens co-administered with RTS,S/AS01 as compared to HBV co-administration (secondary objectives). RTS,S/AS01 induced a response to circumsporozoite protein in all groups. Pain and low grade fever were reported more frequently in the PHiD-CV group co-administered with RTS,S/AS01 than PHiD-CV co-administered with HBV. No serious adverse events were considered to be vaccine-related. RTS,S/AS01 co-administered with pediatric vaccines had an acceptable safety profile. Immune responses to RTS,S/AS01 and to co-administered PHiD-CV, pertussis antigens and HRV were satisfactory.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A phase 3 trial of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in African infants.

          The candidate malaria vaccine RTS,S/AS01 reduced episodes of both clinical and severe malaria in children 5 to 17 months of age by approximately 50% in an ongoing phase 3 trial. We studied infants 6 to 12 weeks of age recruited for the same trial. We administered RTS,S/AS01 or a comparator vaccine to 6537 infants who were 6 to 12 weeks of age at the time of the first vaccination in conjunction with Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) vaccines in a three-dose monthly schedule. Vaccine efficacy against the first or only episode of clinical malaria during the 12 months after vaccination, a coprimary end point, was analyzed with the use of Cox regression. Vaccine efficacy against all malaria episodes, vaccine efficacy against severe malaria, safety, and immunogenicity were also assessed. The incidence of the first or only episode of clinical malaria in the intention-to-treat population during the 14 months after the first dose of vaccine was 0.31 per person-year in the RTS,S/AS01 group and 0.40 per person-year in the control group, for a vaccine efficacy of 30.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.6 to 36.1). Vaccine efficacy in the per-protocol population was 31.3% (97.5% CI, 23.6 to 38.3). Vaccine efficacy against severe malaria was 26.0% (95% CI, -7.4 to 48.6) in the intention-to-treat population and 36.6% (95% CI, 4.6 to 57.7) in the per-protocol population. Serious adverse events occurred with a similar frequency in the two study groups. One month after administration of the third dose of RTS,S/AS01, 99.7% of children were positive for anti-circumsporozoite antibodies, with a geometric mean titer of 209 EU per milliliter (95% CI, 197 to 222). The RTS,S/AS01 vaccine coadministered with EPI vaccines provided modest protection against both clinical and severe malaria in young infants. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals and the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative; RTS,S ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00866619.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pneumococcal vaccines WHO position paper - 2012 - recommendations.

            (2012)
            This article presents the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on the use of pneumococcal vaccines excerpted from the Pneumococcal vaccines WHO position paper - 2012 recently published in the Weekly Epidemiological Record. The current document replaces the position paper on the use 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine published in 2007. Incorporating the most recent developments in the field of pneumococcal vaccines this position paper focuses on the currently available 10-valent and 13-valent conjugate vaccines and their introduction and use in national immunization programmes. It also deals with the 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine, though in less detail than provided in the April 2008 position paper which remains valid. Footnotes to this paper provide a number of core references including references to grading tables that assess the quality of scientific evidence for a few key conclusions. In accordance with its mandate to provide guidance to Member States on health policy matters, WHO issues a series of regularly updated position papers on vaccines and combinations of vaccines against diseases that have an international public health impact. These papers are concerned primarily with the use of vaccines in large-scale immunization programmes; they summarize essential background information on diseases and vaccines, and conclude with WHO's current position on the use of vaccines worldwide. This paper reflects the recommendations of the WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on immunization. Recommendations on the use of pneumococcal vaccines were discussed by SAGE at its meetings in November 2006 (conjugate vaccine) and April 2008 (polysaccharide vaccine) and most recently in November 2011. Evidence presented at these meetings can be accessed at http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/previous/en/index.html. Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Standardization of an opsonophagocytic assay for the measurement of functional antibody activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae using differentiated HL-60 cells.

              Host protection against pneumococcal disease i primarily mediated by phagocytosis. We developed and standardized an opsonophagocytic assay using HL-60 cells (human promyelocytic leukemia cells). Fifty-five serum samples were analyzed for the presence of functional antibody against seven pneumococcal serogroups or serotypes (4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) by using differentiated HL-60 cells (granulocytes) and peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs). Six of the 55 serum samples were from unvaccinated adult volunteers, 31 serum samples were from adults who received one dose of the 14-valent or the 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine, and 18 serum samples were from 16-month-old infants who received four doses of an investigational 7-valent polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine. The results of an opsonophagocytic assay with HL-60 cells correlated highly with those of an assay with PBLs as effector cells (median r for seven serotypes = 0.87: P < 0.01). Opsonophagocytic titers were compared with the immunoglobulin G antibody concentrations determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The r values for serogroups or serotypes 4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F were 0.61, 0.60, 0.67 0.90, 0.61, 0.39, and 0.57, respectively, when HL-60 cells were used as effector cells and 0.56, 0.47, 0.61, 0.90, 0.71, 0.31, and 0.62, respectively, when PBLs were used. The assay requires small amounts of serum (40 microliters per serotype), making this test suitable for assaying infant sera. Culturable cells aid in assay standardization and likely reduce donor-to-donor variability. This standardized assay, in combination with the standardized ELISA, can be used to evaluate current and developing pneumococcal vaccines, in which functional opsonophagocytic antibody activity may correlate with protection against pneumococcal disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hum Vaccin Immunother
                Hum Vaccin Immunother
                KHVI
                khvi20
                Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
                Taylor & Francis
                2164-5515
                2164-554X
                2018
                13 April 2018
                13 April 2018
                : 14
                : 6
                : 1489-1500
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé , Nanoro, Burkina Faso
                [b ]School of Medical Sciences , KNUST, Kumasi (Agogo), Ghana
                [c ]GSK , Wavre, Belgium
                Author notes
                CONTACT Dr Innocent Valea innocentvalea@ 123456yahoo.fr Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Unité de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro , 11 BP 218 Ouagadougou, CMS 11Burkina Faso
                [#]

                At the time of the study JV was an employee of GSK. His current affiliation is WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

                E-mail addresses of authors: Innocent Valéa: innocentvalea@ 123456yahoo.fr ; Samuel Adjei: kwakusam@ 123456yahoo.com ; Effua Usuf: Effua-abigail.x.usuf@ 123456gsk.com ; Ousmane Traore: ousmane_tra@ 123456yahoo.fr ; Daniel Ansong: ansongd@ 123456yahoo.com ; Halidou Tinto: halidoutinto@ 123456gmail.com ; Harry Owusu Boateng: harryoboateng@ 123456gmail.com ; Amanda Leach: amanda.leach@ 123456gsk.com ; Athanase Mwinessobaonfou Some: athanasesome@ 123456yahoo.fr ; Patrick Buabeng: nby_buabeng@ 123456yahoo.com ; Johan Vekemans: johan.vekemans@ 123456gmail.com ; Louis Arnaud Nana: nanalouisarnaud@ 123456yahoo.fr ; Amos Kotey: amoskotey@ 123456yahoo.com ; Pascale Vandoolaeghe: Pascale.V andoolaeghe@ 123456gsk.com ; Florence Ouedraogo: oudeflo@ 123456yahoo.fr ; David Sambian: sambiandj@ 123456yahoo.com ; Marc Lievens: Marc.Lievens@ 123456gsk.com ; Marc Christian Tahita: marctahita@ 123456yahoo.fr ; Theresa Rettig: theresa.rettig@ 123456yahoo.com , Erik Jongert: Erik.Jongert@ 123456gsk.com ; Palpouguini Lompo: palponet@ 123456yahoo.fr ; Ali Idriss: drissli101@ 123456yahoo.com ; Dorota Borys: Dorota.D.Borys@ 123456gsk.com ; Sayouba Ouedraogo: dm_osayouba@ 123456yahoo.fr ; Frank Prempeh: fmarksmillion@ 123456gmail.com ; Md Ahsan Habib: Ahsan.M.Habib@ 123456gsk.com ; Lode Schuerman: Lode.Schuerman@ 123456gsk.com ; Hermann Sorgho: hsorgho@ 123456hotmail.com ; Tsiri Agbenyega: tsiri@ 123456ghana.com

                Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher's website.

                Article
                1442996
                10.1080/21645515.2018.1442996
                6037440
                29630438
                42a1a7d1-0fc8-4162-a7bb-010e21420ab6
                © 2018 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals Published with license by Taylor & Francis

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 29 September 2017
                : 31 January 2018
                : 16 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 24, Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: GlaxoSmithKline 10.13039/100004330
                The study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (GSK). GSK was involved in all stages of the study conduct and analysis and GSK funded the study and all costs associated with the development and the publishing of the present manuscript. All authors had full access to the data and the corresponding author was responsible for submission of the publication.
                Categories
                Research Paper

                Molecular medicine
                co-administration,hepatitis b,immunogenicity,malaria,plasmodium falciparum,pneumococcal conjugate vaccine,rts,s,vaccine

                Comments

                Comment on this article