12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling.

      The British Journal of Ophthalmology
      Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Epiretinal Membrane, surgery, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retinal Perforations, pathology, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Treatment Outcome, Vitrectomy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To investigate the relationship between the size of macular holes and the possible benefit of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. 84 consecutive cases of idiopathic macular hole followed up for at least 3 months were included in this retrospective study. Surgery comprised pars plana vitrectomy, peeling of any epiretinal membrane, 17% C2F6 (hexafluoroethane) gas filling and 10 days of positioning. 36 eyes had ILM peeling. The main outcome measure was the macular hole closure rate checked by optical coherence tomography. The overall postoperative closure rate was 90.5%. For macular holes > or =400 microm in diameter, the rate was 100% with ILM peeling versus 73.3% without (p = 0.015). For smaller macular holes, the rates were 100% in both groups. Postoperative gain in visual acuity was not significantly different in eyes with ILM peeling and those without. ILM peeling does not seem to be useful for macular hole <400 mum in diameter. Its likely benefit has to be investigated for larger macular hole sizes, for which the failure rate is higher.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article