Hematological Toxicity of Combined  177 Lu-Octreotate Radiopeptide Chemotherapy of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Long-Term Follow-Up

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Background: The combination of radiopeptide therapy [peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)] with radiosensitizing chemotherapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs) may improve efficacy, but has the potential to increase myelotoxicity. In a prospective clinical study of GEP NET patients treated with 177Lu-octreotate PRRT in combination with capecitabine and temozolomide, as a prelude to a planned Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG) international randomized controlled trial, we characterized the incidence and degree of hematological toxicity. Materials and Methods: Well-differentiated progressive metastatic GEP NETs in 65 patients were treated with 4 cycles of 7.8 GBq 177Lu-octreotate, 1,650 mg/m2 capecitabine (n = 28) and 1,500 mg/m2 capecitabine with 200 mg/m2 temozolomide (n = 37), and monitored for hematological toxicity over a 5-year period. Results: Short-term, self-limited hematological toxicity grade 3/4 comprised anemia in 1 patient (3.5%) in the 28 patient-cohort of patients treated with 177Lu-octreotate and capecitabine. One of these patients (3.5%) later developed significant anemia and one developed thrombocytopenia (3.5%) over a median follow-up of 60 months (SD 20). The incidence of short-term grade 3/4 reversible myelosuppression in 37 patients after 177Lu-octreotate/capecitabine/temozolomide was zero. Long- term follow-up for a median of 36 months (SD 11) showed significant thrombocytopenia in 2.7% and neutropenia in 2.7% of the patients and anemia in 10.8% of the patients (n = 4). The 3-year median hemoglobin and platelet and neutrophil counts trended downwards, but remained within normal ranges. Two patients in this cohort developed myelodysplastic syndrome. Conclusion: The modest reversible hematological toxicity of PRRT of GEP NETs is not significantly increased by the addition of radiosensitizing chemotherapy with capecitabine and temozolomide in combination with 177Lu-octreotate, which has the potential to enhance the efficacy of radiopeptide therapy.

Related collections

Most cited references 10

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Eric Raymond, Laetitia Dahan, Jean-Luc Raoul … (2011)

The multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib has shown activity against pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in preclinical models and phase 1 and 2 trials. We conducted a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of sunitinib in patients with advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. All patients had Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-defined disease progression documented within 12 months before baseline. A total of 171 patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive best supportive care with either sunitinib at a dose of 37.5 mg per day or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival; secondary end points included the objective response rate, overall survival, and safety. The study was discontinued early, after the independent data and safety monitoring committee observed more serious adverse events and deaths in the placebo group as well as a difference in progression-free survival favoring sunitinib. Median progression-free survival was 11.4 months in the sunitinib group as compared with 5.5 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.66; P<0.001). A Cox proportional-hazards analysis of progression-free survival according to baseline characteristics favored sunitinib in all subgroups studied. The objective response rate was 9.3% in the sunitinib group versus 0% in the placebo group. At the data cutoff point, 9 deaths were reported in the sunitinib group (10%) versus 21 deaths in the placebo group (25%) (hazard ratio for death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.89; P=0.02). The most frequent adverse events in the sunitinib group were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and fatigue. Continuous daily administration of sunitinib at a dose of 37.5 mg improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and the objective response rate as compared with placebo among patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00428597.).

0 comments Cited 643 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Treatment with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog [177 Lu-DOTA 0,Tyr3]octreotate: toxicity, efficacy, and survival.

Dik Kwekkeboom, Wouter de Herder, Boen L r Kam … (2008)

Despite the fact that most gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) are slow-growing, median overall survival (OS) in patients with liver metastases is 2 to 4 years. In metastatic disease, cytoreductive therapeutic options are limited. A relatively new therapy is peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with the radiolabeled somatostatin analog [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate. Here we report on the toxicity and efficacy of this treatment, performed in over 500 patients. Patients were treated up to a cumulative dose of 750 to 800 mCi (27.8-29.6 GBq), usually in four treatment cycles, with treatment intervals of 6 to 10 weeks. Toxicity analysis was done in 504 patients, and efficacy analysis in 310 patients. Any hematologic toxicity grade 3 or 4 occurred after 3.6% of administrations. Serious adverse events that were likely attributable to the treatment were myelodysplastic syndrome in three patients, and temporary, nonfatal, liver toxicity in two patients. Complete and partial tumor remissions occurred in 2% and 28% of 310 GEPNET patients, respectively. Minor tumor response (decrease in size > 25% and < 50%) occurred in 16%. Median time to progression was 40 months. Median OS from start of treatment was 46 months, median OS from diagnosis was 128 months. Compared with historical controls, there was a survival benefit of 40 to 72 months from diagnosis. Treatment with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate has few adverse effects. Tumor response rates and progression-free survival compare favorably to the limited number of alternative treatment modalities. Compared with historical controls, there is a benefit in OS from time of diagnosis of several years.

0 comments Cited 362 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

First-line chemotherapy with capecitabine and temozolomide in patients with metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas.

Jonathan Strosberg, Robert L. Fine, Junsung Choi … (2011)

Temozolomide is an active agent in metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas. In vitro data indicate that the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is synergistic for induction of apoptosis in neuroendocrine tumor cell lines. The authors retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of capecitabine and temozolomide in 30 patients with metastatic pancreatic endocrine carcinomas to assess response rate, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Patients with metastatic, well, or moderately differentiated pancreatic endocrine carcinomas who had not received prior systemic chemotherapy were treated with capecitabine (750 mg/m² twice daily, days 1-14) and temozolomide (200 mg/m² once daily, days 10-14) every 28 days. Among 30 patients treated, 21 (70%) patients achieved an objective radiographic response. Median progression-free survival was 18 months. The rate of survival at two years was 92%. Only 4 patients (12%) experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is associated with an exceptionally high and durable response rate in metastatic endocrine carcinomas of the pancreas. Clinical endpoints, including response rate, survival, and toxicity, are superior to those observed with streptozocin-based regimens. Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

0 comments Cited 181 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (publisher-id): NEN

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Neuroendocrinology

Journal ID (doi): 10.1159/issn.0028-3835

Title: Neuroendocrinology

Publisher: S. Karger AG

ISSN (Print): 0028-3835

ISSN (Electronic): 1423-0194

Publication date Subscription-year: 2014

Publication date (Print): July 2014

Publication date (Electronic): 04 April 2014

Volume: 99

Issue: 2

Pages: 108-117

Affiliations

Departments of ^aHematology, ^bOncology and ^cNuclear Medicine, Fremantle Hospital, The University of Western Australia, Fremantle, W.A., Australia

Author notes

*J. Harvey Turner, Department of Nuclear Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Fremantle Hospital, Alma Street, Fremantle, WA 6160 (Australia), E-Mail Harvey.Turner@health.wa.gov.au

Article

Publisher ID: 362558 Other ID: Neuroendocrinology 2014;99:108-117

DOI: 10.1159/000362558

PubMed ID: 24714208

SO-VID: 420c23ab-c828-432a-aa8e-4e5db7459a90

License:

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

History

Date received : 27 September 2013

Date accepted : 28 March 2014

Page count

Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 10

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.