17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Treatment in Patients with Osteoarthritis Results in Overall Improvement in Pain and Symptoms and Reduces Synovial Inflammation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patients with late‐stage Kellgren‐Lawrence knee osteoarthritis received a single intra‐articular injection of 1, 10, or 50 million bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM‐MSCs) in a phase I/IIa trial to assess safety and efficacy using a broad toolset of analytical methods. Besides safety, outcomes included patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs): Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cartilage morphology (Whole Organ MRI Scores [WORMS]), collagen content (T2 scores), and synovitis; and inflammation and cartilage turnover biomarkers, all over 12 months. BM‐MSCs were characterized by a panel of anti‐inflammatory markers to predict clinical efficacy. There were no serious adverse events, although four patients had minor, transient adverse events. There were significant overall improvements in KOOS pain, symptoms, quality of life, and WOMAC stiffness relative to baseline; the 50 million dose achieved clinically relevant improvements across most PROMs. WORMS and T2 scores did not change relative to baseline. However, cartilage catabolic biomarkers and MRI synovitis were significantly lower at higher doses. Pro‐inflammatory monocytes/macrophages and interleukin 12 levels decreased in the synovial fluid after MSC injection. The panel of BM‐MSC anti‐inflammatory markers was strongly predictive of PROMs over 12 months. Autologous BM‐MSCs are safe and result in significant improvements in PROMs at 12 months. Our analytical tools provide important insights into BM‐MSC dosing and BM‐MSC reduction of synovial inflammation and cartilage degradation and provide a highly predictive donor selection criterion that will be critical in translating MSC therapy for osteoarthritis. stem cells translational medicine 2019;8:746&757

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mesenchymal stem cells: mechanisms of inflammation.

          In adults, human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) are found in vivo at low frequency and are defined by their capacity to differentiate into bone, cartilage, and adipose tissue, depending on the stimuli and culture conditions under which they are expanded. Although MSCs were initially hypothesized to be the panacea for regenerating tissues, MSCs appear to be more important in therapeutics to regulate the immune response invoked in settings such as tissue injury, transplantation, and autoimmunity. MSCs have been used therapeutically in clinical trials and subsequently in practice to treat graft-versus-host disease following bone marrow transplantation. Reports of successful immune modulation suggest efficacy in a wide range of autoimmune conditions, such as demyelinating neurological disease (multiple sclerosis), systemic lupus erythematosus, and Crohn's disease, among others. This review provides background information about hMSCs and also describes their putative mechanisms of action in inflammation. We provide a summary of ongoing clinical trials to allow (a) full comprehension of the range of diseases in which hMSC therapy may be beneficial and (b) identification of gaps in our knowledge about the mechanisms of action of therapeutic MSCs in disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mesenchymal stem cell-educated macrophages: a novel type of alternatively activated macrophages.

            Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are capable of modulating the immune system through interaction with a wide range of immune cells. This study investigates the hypothesis that interaction of MSCs with macrophages could play a significant role in their antiinflammatory/immune modulatory effects. MSCs were derived from bone marrow and monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy donors. We cultured human monocytes for 7 days without any added cytokines to generate macrophages, and then cocultured them for 3 more days with culture-expanded MSCs. We used cell surface antigen expression and intracellular cytokine expression patterns to study the immunophenotype of macrophages at the end of this coculture period, and phagocytic assays to investigate their functional activity in vitro. Macrophages cocultured with MSCs consistently showed high-level expression of CD206, a marker of alternatively activated macrophages. Furthermore, these macrophages expressed high levels of interleukin (IL)-10 and low levels of IL-12, as determined by intracellular staining, typical of alternatively activated macrophages. However, macrophages cocultured with MSCs also expressed high levels of IL-6 and low levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) compared to controls. Functionally, macrophages cocultured with MSCs showed a higher level of phagocytic activity. We describe a novel type of human macrophage generated in vitro after coculture with MSCs that assumes an immunophenotype defined as IL-10-high, IL-12-low, IL-6-high, and TNF-alpha-low secreting cells. These MSC-educated macrophages may be a unique and novel type of alternatively activated macrophage with a potentially significant role in tissue repair.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The three human monocyte subsets: implications for health and disease.

              Human blood monocytes are heterogeneous and conventionally subdivided into two subsets based on CD16 expression. Recently, the official nomenclature subdivides monocytes into three subsets, the additional subset arising from the segregation of the CD16+ monocytes into two based on relative expression of CD14. Recent whole genome analysis reveal that specialized functions and phenotypes can be attributed to these newly defined monocyte subsets. In this review, we discuss these recent results, and also the description and utility of this new segregation in several disease conditions. We also discuss alternative markers for segregating the monocyte subsets, for example using Tie-2 and slan, which do not necessarily follow the official method of segregating monocyte subsets based on relative CD14 and CD16 expressions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sowmya.viswanathan@uhnresearch.ca
                Journal
                Stem Cells Transl Med
                Stem Cells Transl Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2157-6580
                SCT3
                Stem Cells Translational Medicine
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                2157-6564
                2157-6580
                09 April 2019
                August 2019
                : 8
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1002/sct3.2019.8.issue-8 )
                : 746-757
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Arthritis Program University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 2 ] Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 3 ] Cell Therapy Program University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 4 ] Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 5 ] Joint Department of Medical Imaging University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence: Sowmya Viswanathan, Ph.D., Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, 60 Leonard Ave., Office 3KD479, Toronto, Ontario M5T 0S8, Canada. Telephone: 416‐634‐7239; e‐mail: sowmya.viswanathan@ 123456uhnresearch.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4552-0179
                Article
                SCT312492
                10.1002/sctm.18-0183
                6646697
                30964245
                4205caf3-01e9-4628-8685-13a19999b95b
                © 2019 The Authors. stem cells translational medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 20 August 2018
                : 13 February 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Pages: 12, Words: 9084
                Funding
                Funded by: Toronto General & Western Hospital Foundation
                Funded by: Arthritis Society
                Award ID: TPF‐15‐123
                Funded by: Arthritis Society Young Investigator Operating
                Award ID: TAS‐YIO 15‐321
                Funded by: Canada Foundation for Innovation
                Categories
                Human Clinical Article
                Human Clinical Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                sct312492
                August 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.6.2 mode:remove_FC converted:23.07.2019

                arthritis,mesenchymal stem cells,monocyte,cellular therapy,clinical trials,selectable marker

                Comments

                Comment on this article