2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The progressive co-evolutionary development of the Pan-Tibetan Highlands, the Asian monsoon system and Asian biodiversity

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Within the ongoing controversy regarding the orogeny of the Tibetan Plateau region, two directly conflicting endmember frameworks have emerged in which either: (1) a high central ‘proto-plateau’ existed before the onset of India–Asia continental collision; or (2) the early Paleogene central Tibet comprised a wide east–west-oriented lowland c. 1–2 km above sea-level, bounded by high (>4.5 km) mountain systems. Reconstructing the development of the plateau correctly is fundamental to running realistic Earth system models that explore monsoon and biodiversity evolution in the region, and understanding the interplay between monsoon dynamics, landscape and biodiversity is critical for future resource management. We explore the strengths and weaknesses of different palaeoaltimetric methodologies as applied across the Tibetan region. Combining methodologies, appreciating the vulnerabilities arising from their underlying assumptions and testing them using numerical climate models produces consilience (agreement), allowing further refinement of both models and proxies. We argue that an east–west-oriented Paleogene Central Tibetan Valley was a cradle and conduit for thermophilic biota, seeding the modern regional biodiversity. The rise of eastern Tibet intensified regional rainfall and erosion, which increased topographic relief and biodiversification. Gradual monsoon development reflected the evolving topography, but modern-like Asian monsoons developed only after a plateau formed in the Miocene.

          Related collections

          Most cited references410

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

          Conservationists are far from able to assist all species under threat, if only for lack of funding. This places a premium on priorities: how can we support the most species at the least cost? One way is to identify 'biodiversity hotspots' where exceptional concentrations of endemic species are undergoing exceptional loss of habitat. As many as 44% of all species of vascular plants and 35% of all species in four vertebrate groups are confined to 25 hotspots comprising only 1.4% of the land surface of the Earth. This opens the way for a 'silver bullet' strategy on the part of conservation planners, focusing on these hotspots in proportion to their share of the world's species at risk.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Phanerozoic record of global sea-level change.

              K. Miller (2005)
              We review Phanerozoic sea-level changes [543 million years ago (Ma) to the present] on various time scales and present a new sea-level record for the past 100 million years (My). Long-term sea level peaked at 100 +/- 50 meters during the Cretaceous, implying that ocean-crust production rates were much lower than previously inferred. Sea level mirrors oxygen isotope variations, reflecting ice-volume change on the 10(4)- to 10(6)-year scale, but a link between oxygen isotope and sea level on the 10(7)-year scale must be due to temperature changes that we attribute to tectonically controlled carbon dioxide variations. Sea-level change has influenced phytoplankton evolution, ocean chemistry, and the loci of carbonate, organic carbon, and siliciclastic sediment burial. Over the past 100 My, sea-level changes reflect global climate evolution from a time of ephemeral Antarctic ice sheets (100 to 33 Ma), through a time of large ice sheets primarily in Antarctica (33 to 2.5 Ma), to a world with large Antarctic and large, variable Northern Hemisphere ice sheets (2.5 Ma to the present).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Geological Society, London, Special Publications
                SP
                Geological Society of London
                0305-8719
                2041-4927
                March 26 2024
                June 2025
                September 13 2024
                June 2025
                : 549
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
                [2 ]CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China
                [3 ]State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Resources and Environment (TPESRE), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
                [4 ]School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Clifton, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK
                [5 ]State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation & Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
                [6 ]School of Earth Sciences, and Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK
                [7 ]Organic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK
                [8 ]State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
                [9 ]School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
                [10 ]Geology: School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
                [11 ]Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119017 Moscow, Russia
                [12 ]State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir and Exploit, and China National Petroleum Corporation Key Laboratory of Carbonate Reservoirs, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
                [13 ]School of Geography Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
                [14 ]State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong Province, China
                [15 ]Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
                Article
                10.1144/SP549-2023-180
                41f1d647-2a84-4520-b800-3cff803a9814
                © 2025

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article