27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Struggle Against Outsourcing of Diagnostic Services in Government Facilities: Strategies and Lessons From a Campaign Led by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (People’s Health Movement) in Chhattisgarh, India

      research-article
      * , a ,
      Journal of Social and Political Psychology
      PsychOpen
      outsourcing, People’s Health Movement, health services, diagnostics, public services, public private partnerships, privatisation, India

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since 1991, India, like many countries, has undergone a process of ‘liberalisation’ which has entailed an increase in outsourcing of public services through Public Private Partnerships. In December 2012, Chhattisgarh state started the process of outsourcing diagnostics and radiology services in 379 government health facilities. Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (People’s Health Movement) Chhattisgarh mounted a (so far) successful campaign against this move. Drawing on secondary data and the personal experiences and observations of the author, this paper documents Jan Swasthya Abhiyan’s struggle, describing the strategies that were used, their efficacy, the facilitators and challenges. It uses this experience as a basis to reflectively suggest lessons for health activism and the theoretical implications. Jan Swasthya Abhiyan founded its resistance on a detailed evidence-based critique of the proposal that was disseminated, along with demands. The campaign then used multiple strategies, from petitioning the government, to street action, to advocacy with media and bureaucrats. Alliances were built with trade unions and groups working on social justice issues. Privatisation and neo-liberal policies provided a rallying point and framing the issue as a moral argument and in terms of larger concerns for social justice helped build wider solidarity. This experience suggests that the use of evidence and multiple strategies, effective framing of the issue, forging broader alliances, and a sustained campaign can all be important strategies for health activism. It also highlights the need for health activism to continue beyond a single campaign. Staying vigilant, monitoring, evidence building, mobilizing people and continuing to build alliances on such issues are critical tasks for social movements and networks like the People’s Health Movement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

            K Malterud (2001)
            Qualitative research methods could help us to improve our understanding of medicine. Rather than thinking of qualitative and quantitative strategies as incompatible, they should be seen as complementary. Although procedures for textual interpretation differ from those of statistical analysis, because of the different type of data used and questions to be answered, the underlying principles are much the same. In this article I propose relevance, validity, and reflexivity as overall standards for qualitative inquiry. I will discuss the specific challenges in relation to reflexivity, transferability, and shared assumptions of interpretation, which are met by medical researchers who do this type of research, and I will propose guidelines for qualitative inquiry.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JSPP
                J Soc Polit Psych
                Journal of Social and Political Psychology
                J. Soc. Polit. Psych.
                PsychOpen
                2195-3325
                21 December 2018
                2018
                : 6
                : 2
                : 677-695
                Affiliations
                [a ]Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (People’s Health Movement India), Raipur, India
                [2]London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                [* ]28, New Panchsheel Nagar, Raipur, India. Pin Code 492001. sulakshana.nandi@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                jspp.v6i2.923
                10.5964/jspp.v6i2.923
                41eed8c1-187d-49e1-a3a2-6e5ef7454fc6
                Copyright @ 2018

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 January 2018
                : 09 November 2018
                Categories
                Special Thematic Section on "Rethinking Health and Social Justice Activism in Changing Times"

                Psychology
                People’s Health Movement,health services,outsourcing,diagnostics,public services,public private partnerships,privatisation,India

                Comments

                Comment on this article