3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Exercise Physiology Services in Australia: A Retrospective Audit

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a shift in healthcare towards telehealth delivery, which presents challenges for exercise physiology services. We aimed to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reach, efficacy, adoption and implementation of telehealth delivery for exercise physiology services by comparing Australian practises before (prior to 25 January 2020) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (after 25 January 2020).

          Methods

          This retrospective audit included 80 accredited exercise physiology clinicians. We examined relevant dimensions of the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation) from the clinician perspective.

          Results

          During the COVID-19 pandemic, 91% ( n = 73/80) of surveyed clinicians offered telehealth delivery service, compared to 25% ( n = 20/80) prior. Mean (SD) telehealth delivery per week doubled from 5 (7) to 10 (8) hours. In-person delivery decreased from 23 (11) to 15 (11) hours per week. Typical reasons for not offering telehealth delivery were client physical/cognitive incapacity ( n = 33/80, 41%) and safety ( n = 24/80, 30%). Clinician-reported reasons for typical clients not adopting telehealth delivery were personal preference ( n = 57/71, 80%), physical capacity ( n = 35/71, 49%) and access to reliable delivery platforms ( n = 27/71, 38%). Zoom ( n = 54/71, 76%) and telephone ( n = 53/71, 75%) were the most commonly used platforms. Of the reasons contributing to incomplete treatment, lack of confidence in delivery mode was sevenfold higher for telehealth compared to in-person delivery. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported.

          Conclusions

          During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth delivery of exercise physiology services increased and in-person delivery decreased, which suggests the profession was adaptable and agile. However, further research determining comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness is warranted.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-022-00483-2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

            Progress in public health and community-based interventions has been hampered by the lack of a comprehensive evaluation framework appropriate to such programs. Multilevel interventions that incorporate policy, environmental, and individual components should be evaluated with measurements suited to their settings, goals, and purpose. In this commentary, the authors propose a model (termed the RE-AIM model) for evaluating public health interventions that assesses 5 dimensions: reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. These dimensions occur at multiple levels (e.g., individual, clinic or organization, community) and interact to determine the public health or population-based impact of a program or policy. The authors discuss issues in evaluating each of these dimensions and combining them to determine overall public health impact. Failure to adequately evaluate programs on all 5 dimensions can lead to a waste of resources, discontinuities between stages of research, and failure to improve public health to the limits of our capacity. The authors summarize strengths and limitations of the RE-AIM model and recommend areas for future research and application.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                p.owen@deakin.edu.au
                s.keating@uq.edu.au
                caskew@usc.edu.au
                k.clanchy@griffith.edu.au
                paul.jansons@deakin.edu.au
                ralph.maddison@deakin.edu.au
                a.maiorana@curtin.edu.au
                mcvicarj@deakin.edu.au
                suzanne.robinson@deakin.edu.au
                niamh.mundell@deakin.edu.au
                Journal
                Sports Med Open
                Sports Med Open
                Sports Medicine - Open
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2199-1170
                2198-9761
                22 July 2022
                22 July 2022
                December 2022
                : 8
                : 94
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1021.2, ISNI 0000 0001 0526 7079, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, , Deakin University, ; Geelong, VIC Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.1003.2, ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, , The University of Queensland, ; Saint Lucia, QLD Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.1034.6, ISNI 0000 0001 1555 3415, VasoActive Research Group, School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, , University of the Sunshine Coast, ; Sippy Downs, QLD Australia
                [4 ]Sunshine Cost Health Institute, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Birtinya, QLD Australia
                [5 ]GRID grid.1022.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0437 5432, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, , Griffith University, ; Gold Coast, QLD Australia
                [6 ]GRID grid.1022.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0437 5432, Menzies Health Institute, , Griffith University, ; Gold Coast, QLD Australia
                [7 ]GRID grid.1002.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7857, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, , Monash University, ; Clayton, VIC Australia
                [8 ]GRID grid.459958.c, ISNI 0000 0004 4680 1997, Allied Health Department, , Fiona Stanley Hospital, ; Perth, WA Australia
                [9 ]GRID grid.1032.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0375 4078, School of Allied Health, , Curtin University, ; Perth, WA Australia
                [10 ]GRID grid.1032.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0375 4078, Curtin School of Population Health, , Curtin University, ; Perth, WA Australia
                [11 ]GRID grid.1021.2, ISNI 0000 0001 0526 7079, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, , Deakin University, ; Geelong, VIC Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5406-3216
                Article
                483
                10.1186/s40798-022-00483-2
                9306237
                35867168
                419a2069-1fa0-4c8d-b412-9af3b3e67b42
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 1 March 2022
                : 29 June 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Exercise and Sports Science Australia (ESSA Telehealth Research Project)
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
                Award ID: 1122190
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                telehealth,coronavirus,telemedicine,ehealth,mhealth,rehabilitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article