2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Inconsistent effects of landscape heterogeneity and land-use on animal diversity in an agricultural mosaic: a multi-scale and multi-taxon investigation

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared.

            The question of how to meet rising food demand at the least cost to biodiversity requires the evaluation of two contrasting alternatives: land sharing, which integrates both objectives on the same land; and land sparing, in which high-yield farming is combined with protecting natural habitats from conversion to agriculture. To test these alternatives, we compared crop yields and densities of bird and tree species across gradients of agricultural intensity in southwest Ghana and northern India. More species were negatively affected by agriculture than benefited from it, particularly among species with small global ranges. For both taxa in both countries, land sparing is a more promising strategy for minimizing negative impacts of food production, at both current and anticipated future levels of production.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.

              Biodiversity in agricultural landscapes can be increased with conversion of some production lands into 'more-natural'- unmanaged or extensively managed - lands. However, it remains unknown to what extent biodiversity can be enhanced by altering landscape pattern without reducing agricultural production. We propose a framework for this problem, considering separately compositional heterogeneity (the number and proportions of different cover types) and configurational heterogeneity (the spatial arrangement of cover types). Cover type classification and mapping is based on species requirements, such as feeding and nesting, resulting in measures of 'functional landscape heterogeneity'. We then identify three important questions: does biodiversity increase with (1) increasing heterogeneity of the more-natural areas, (2) increasing compositional heterogeneity of production cover types and (3) increasing configurational heterogeneity of production cover types? We discuss approaches for addressing these questions. Such studies should have high priority because biodiversity protection globally depends increasingly on maintaining biodiversity in human-dominated landscapes. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Landscape Ecology
                Landscape Ecol
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                0921-2973
                1572-9761
                February 2018
                November 23 2017
                February 2018
                : 33
                : 2
                : 241-255
                Article
                10.1007/s10980-017-0595-7
                41754fb0-1d20-4b9a-98b5-9c8d4641efb2
                © 2018

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article