3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evidence-based Nasal Analysis for Rhinoplasty: The 10-7-5 Method

      research-article
      , MD * , , , MD * , , MD * ,
      Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
      Wolters Kluwer Health

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary:

          Rhinoplasty is one of the top 5 aesthetic surgical procedures performed in plastic surgery. A methodical evaluation based on solid and up-to-date scientific evidence in different key areas of nasal and facial analysis is presented, the 10-7-5 method. This represents the most important preoperative step for a successful rhinoplasty. The 10-7-5 method for nasal analysis is a useful instrument that provides the rhinoplasty surgeon a deep comprehension of nasal anatomy. Understanding the nasal structures’ main relationships and consequences of each surgical maneuver on nasal framework assists on establishing the appropriate surgical goals for each patient, both in primary and secondary rhinoplasty cases. This systematic analysis of patient’s frontal, lateral, and basal nasal views provides a background to identify changes to ideal aesthetic proportions and how to surgically restore them while maintaining gender and ethnic congruency.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery.

          The conventional designation of septal pathology is a deviated septum, and the common treatment of choice is submucous resection of the septum. These limited generic terms leave the surgery open to frequent failure and render the education of this topic suboptimal. During 1224 septal surgeries, we have observed six different categories of septal deviation requiring different surgical treatments. A study was conducted to investigate the frequency of different classes of septal deviation and to develop guidelines for a more successful surgical correction of each category. Ninety-three consecutive patients who underwent septoplasty were carefully evaluated for the type of septal deformity, age, gender, history of trauma, and previous septal surgery. The surgical technique was reviewed for each category of the septal deformity. Of the 93 patients, 71 were women and 22 were men. Ages ranged from 13 to 76, with an average age of 31.5. Most patients exhibited a "septal tilt" deformity (40 percent; 37 of 93) or a C-shape anteroposterior deviation (32 percent; 30 of 93). The other deformities were C-shape cephalocaudal (4 percent; 4 of 93), S-shape anteroposterior (9 percent; 8 of 93), S-shape cephalocaudal (1 percent; 1 of 93), or localized deviations or large spurs (14 percent; 13 of 93). Each of the six categories of septal deviation requires specific management. If a single procedure is selected for all of the septal deformities, disappointing results may ensue.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Component dorsal hump reduction: the importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty.

            Dorsal hump reduction can create both functional and aesthetic problems if performed incorrectly. Component dorsal hump reduction allows a graduated approach to the correction of the nasal dorsum by emphasizing the integrity of the upper lateral cartilages when performing dorsal reduction. Use of this approach can minimize the need for spreader grafts in primary rhinoplasty patients. Possible untoward sequelae of dorsal hump reduction include long-term dorsal irregularities caused by uneven resection or overresection or underresection of the osseocartilaginous hump irregularity; the inverted-V deformity; and excessive narrowing of the midvault. The component dorsal hump reduction technique is a five-step method: (1) separation of the upper lateral cartilages from the septum, (2) incremental reduction of the septum proper, (3) dorsal bony reduction, (4) verification by palpation, and (5) final modifications (spreader grafts, suturing techniques, osteotomies). A graduated approach is described that offers control and precision at each interval. Fundamental to the final outcome is the protection and formation of strong dorsal aesthetic lines that define the appearance of the dorsum on frontal view. Furthermore, preservation of the transverse portions of the upper lateral cartilages is essential to maintain patency of the internal nasal valve, maintain the shape of the dorsal aesthetic lines, and avoid the inverted-V deformity. Finally, if needed, spreader grafts are enormously adaptable and can be customized for any deformity (unilateral or bilateral, visible or invisible) to handle functional or aesthetic problems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Divine proportion in facial esthetics.

              R Ricketts (1982)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                2169-7574
                February 2020
                26 February 2020
                : 8
                : 2
                : e2632
                Affiliations
                From the [* ]Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute and private practice, Dallas, Tex.
                []Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal.
                Author notes
                Rod J. Rohrich, MD, Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute and Private Practice, 9101 N Central Expy, Dallas, TX 75231, E-mail: rod.rohrich@ 123456dpsi.org
                Article
                00023
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000002632
                7159929
                32309081
                406cf7a8-9630-41b4-91df-0baecd2d1a4e
                Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 22 October 2019
                : 18 November 2019
                Categories
                Special Topic
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article