Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of follow-up time on the ability of subcutaneous epcoritamab to induce deep and durable complete remissions in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: Updated results from the pivotal EPCORE NHL-1 trial.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          7525

          Background: Outcomes are poor for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Effective treatments (tx) that drive deep, durable responses and long-term benefit are needed. In the pivotal EPCORE NHL-1 trial (NCT03625037), single-agent epcoritamab (epcor) showed high complete response (CR) and MRD-negativity rates, a median duration of response (mDoR) not reached (NR) in pts who achieved CR, and a manageable safety profile as an off-the-shelf, subcutaneous (SC), CD3xCD20 T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody (Thieblemont et al, JCO 2022). We present updated results with longer follow-up in a challenging-to-treat population. Methods: Pts with R/R CD20 + LBCL received SC epcor (step-up priming and intermediate doses followed by 48-mg full doses) in 28-d cycles (Cs): QW, C1–3; Q2W, C4–9; Q4W, C≥10 until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Results: As of Nov 18, 2022, of 157 pts (median age, 64 y) with LBCL (including DLBCL [n=139], HGBCL [n=9], PMBCL [n=4], and FL grade 3B [n=5]; 13/99 double/triple-hit by FISH), 36 remain on tx. Pts had a median of 1.6 y from initial diagnosis to first dose and a median of 3 (range, 2–11) prior tx lines; 61% of pts had primary refractory disease, and 39% had prior CAR T, of whom 75% progressed ≤6 mo of tx. Median follow-up was 20 mo (range, 0.3+ to 28.2). Pts received a mean of 9.1 cycles. LBCL overall response and CR rates were 63.1% and 39.5%, respectively, and were consistent for DLBCL (61.9% and 39.6%). The mDoCR was 20.8 mo. Median time to CR was 2.7 mo; 8 pts converted from partial response to CR at ≥36 wk. Median overall survival (mOS) was 18.5 mo (95% CI, 11.7–NR), with an estimated 58% of pts alive at 12 mo. mOS was NR in pts who achieved CR. Additional outcomes for pts with CR are shown in Table. The most common TEAEs of any grade (G) were: CRS 51%, neutropenia 24%, pyrexia 24%, fatigue 23%, nausea 22%, and diarrhea 21%. Nine pts (6%) had G1–2 ICANS, and 1 pt had a G5 event with confounding factors. Fatal TEAEs occurred in 15 pts; 2 were considered related (COVID-19, ICANS). CRS was predominantly low grade (48% G1–2; 3% G3) and occurred following the first full dose (C1D15). One pt discontinued tx due to G1 CRS. Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) data will be presented. Conclusions: These data with longer follow-up reaffirm single-agent SC epcor induces durable CRs with improved outcomes and a manageable safety profile. No new safety signals were observed in these hard-to-treat pts. These impressive data support the ongoing phase 3 studies evaluating epcor across different lines of tx and in various combinations. Clinical trial information: NCT03625037 . [Table: see text]

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          June 01 2023
          June 01 2023
          : 41
          : 16_suppl
          : 7525
          Affiliations
          [1 ]University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
          [2 ]Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Benite, France
          [3 ]MSC National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow, Poland
          [4 ]Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
          [5 ]Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
          [6 ]On behalf of the Lunenburg Lymphoma Phase I/II Consortium-HOVON/LLPC, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands
          [7 ]The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
          [8 ]Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea
          [9 ]University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom
          [10 ]Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
          [11 ]Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
          [12 ]On behalf of the Lunenburg Lymphoma Phase I/II Consortium-HOVON/LLPC, Maastricht, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
          [13 ]National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
          [14 ]Hackensack Meridian Health Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ
          [15 ]The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
          [16 ]Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Duran i Reynals, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
          [17 ]Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
          [18 ]AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL
          [19 ]Genmab, Princeton, NJ
          [20 ]Assistance Publique & Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Hémato-oncologie, Université de Paris, Paris, France
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.7525
          400ae496-3dc5-47bf-a0f1-73f813efc11d
          © 2023
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content72

          Cited by5