4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PREHAB FAI- Prehabilitation for patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome -Protocol for an assessor blinded randomised controlled feasibility study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The past decade has seen an exponential growth of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Procedures such as hip arthroscopy have rapidly grown and become the standard of care for patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS). Although, the results of such procedures are encouraging, a large proportion of patients do not achieve optimal outcomes due to chronicity and deconditioning as a result of delay in diagnosis and increased waiting times amongst other factors. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials, moderate certainty evidence supported prehabilitation over standard care in optimising several domains including muscle strength, pain and health related quality of life in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgical interventions. However, the role of prehabilitation in patients with FAI syndrome undergoing hip arthroscopy has received little attention.

          Aim

          To evaluate the feasibility, suitability, acceptability and safety of a prehabilitation programme for FAI to inform a future definitive randomised control trial to assess effectiveness.

          Methods

          A systematically developed prehabilitation intervention based on a literature review and international consensus will be utilised in this study. A mixed methodology encompassing a two-arm randomised parallel study alongside an embedded qualitative component will be used to answer the study objectives. Patients will be recruited from a tertiary referral NHS centre for young adult hip pathology in the UK. Patient reported outcomes such as iHOT-12, Brief Pain Inventory Scale (Short form), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Patient Global Impression of Change score will be obtained alongside objective measurements such as Muscle Strength and Star Excursion Balance Test at various time points. Outcome measures will be obtained at baseline (prior to prehabilitation intervention), after prehabilitation before surgery, and at 6 weeks+/- 4 weeks and 6 months +/- 4 weeks (planned primary endpoint for definitive RCT) postoperatively when participants attend the research site for clinical care and remotely at 12 months +/- 4 weeks postoperatively. Mean change and 95% CI, and effect size of outcome measures will be used to determine the sample size for a future RCT. For the qualitative component, in depth face-to-face semi-structured interviews with physiotherapists and focus groups with participants will be conducted to assess the feasibility, suitability, and acceptability of the prehabilitation intervention using a predetermined success criteria. All qualitative data will be recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

          Discussion

          This study will be first of its kind to evaluate a systematically developed prehabilitation intervention for patients with FAIS undergoing hip arthroscopy. This study will provide important preliminary data to inform feasibility of a definitive RCT in the future to evaluate effectiveness of a prehabilitation intervention.

          Trial registration

          ISRCTN 15371248, 09/03/2023.

          Trial protocol

          Version 2.3, 26th June 2023.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

            Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners

              The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data management platform was developed in 2004 to address an institutional need at Vanderbilt University, then shared with a limited number of adopting sites beginning in 2006. Given bi-directional benefit in early sharing experiments, we created a broader consortium sharing and support model for any academic, non-profit, or government partner wishing to adopt the software. Our sharing framework and consortium-based support model have evolved over time along with the size of the consortium (currently more than 3200 REDCap partners across 128 countries). While the "REDCap Consortium" model represents only one example of how to build and disseminate a software platform, lessons learned from our approach may assist other research institutions seeking to build and disseminate innovative technologies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                11 April 2024
                2024
                : 19
                : 4
                : e0301194
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Young Adult Hip Service & Physiotherapy Department, Addenbrooke’s- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [2 ] School of Allied Health, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [3 ] Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Canada
                [4 ] Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Young Adult Hip Service, Addenbrooke’s – Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                The University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Dr Khanduja reported being a chief investigator for the NIHR doctoral fellowship during the conduct of the study; receiving consulting fees from Smith & Nephew PLC and Arthrex Inc, outside the submitted work; serving as a board member for the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry, British Hip Society, European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, and Arthroscopy, and the International Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology; and serving on the editorial boards of the Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, International Journal of Orthopaedics, International Orthopaedics, and Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. No other disclosures were reported.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4477-2822
                Article
                PONE-D-23-28781
                10.1371/journal.pone.0301194
                11008823
                38603694
                3ffd3fea-3a8e-46a3-9b3e-fdfdddef825a
                © 2024 Punnoose et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 14 September 2023
                : 11 March 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 21
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007602, Programme Grants for Applied Research;
                Award ID: NIHR302117
                Award Recipient :
                Mr Anuj Punnoose has received funding for his PhD Fellowship from the National Institute of Health & Care Research UK (Award NIHR302117). The funders did not and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Skeleton
                Pelvis
                Hip
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Skeleton
                Pelvis
                Hip
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Musculoskeletal System Procedures
                Arthroscopy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Clinical Trials
                Randomized Controlled Trials
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drug Research and Development
                Clinical Trials
                Randomized Controlled Trials
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Clinical Trials
                Randomized Controlled Trials
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Qualitative Studies
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Pain
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Systematic Reviews
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Pain
                Myalgia
                Custom metadata
                No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article