1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Experientially-grounded and distributional semantic vectors uncover dissociable representations of conceptual categories

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Neuronal populations code similar concepts by similar activity patterns across the human brain's semantic networks. However, it is unclear to what extent such meaning-to-symbol mapping reflects distributional statistics, or experiential information grounded in sensorimotor and emotional knowledge. We asked whether integrating distributional and experiential data better distinguished conceptual categories than each method taken separately. We examined the similarity structure of fMRI patterns elicited by visually presented action- and object-related words using representational similarity analysis (RSA). We found that the distributional and experiential/integrative models respectively mapped the high-dimensional semantic space in left inferior frontal, anterior temporal, and in left precentral, posterior inferior/middle temporal cortex. Furthermore, results from model comparisons uncovered category-specific similarity patterns, as both distributional and experiential models matched the similarity patterns for action concepts in left fronto-temporal cortex, whilst the experiential/integrative (but not distributional) models matched the similarity patterns for object concepts in left fusiform and angular gyrus.

          Related collections

          Most cited references115

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Grounded cognition.

            Grounded cognition rejects traditional views that cognition is computation on amodal symbols in a modular system, independent of the brain's modal systems for perception, action, and introspection. Instead, grounded cognition proposes that modal simulations, bodily states, and situated action underlie cognition. Accumulating behavioral and neural evidence supporting this view is reviewed from research on perception, memory, knowledge, language, thought, social cognition, and development. Theories of grounded cognition are also reviewed, as are origins of the area and common misperceptions of it. Theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues are raised whose future treatment is likely to affect the growth and impact of grounded cognition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.

              The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) is a non-verbal pictorial assessment technique that directly measures the pleasure, arousal, and dominance associated with a person's affective reaction to a wide variety of stimuli. In this experiment, we compare reports of affective experience obtained using SAM, which requires only three simple judgments, to the Semantic Differential scale devised by Mehrabian and Russell (An approach to environmental psychology, 1974) which requires 18 different ratings. Subjective reports were measured to a series of pictures that varied in both affective valence and intensity. Correlations across the two rating methods were high both for reports of experienced pleasure and felt arousal. Differences obtained in the dominance dimension of the two instruments suggest that SAM may better track the personal response to an affective stimulus. SAM is an inexpensive, easy method for quickly assessing reports of affective response in many contexts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Lang Cogn Neurosci
                Lang Cogn Neurosci
                Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
                Routledge
                2327-3798
                2327-3801
                12 July 2023
                2024
                12 July 2023
                : 39
                : 8 , Special Issue: Patterns of language (Part 1). Guest Editors: Olaf Hauk and Alex Clarke
                : 1020-1044
                Affiliations
                [a ]Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [b ]Donders Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [c ]Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council , Cambridge, UK
                [d ]Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                [e ]MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK
                [f ]Department of Psychology, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute , Columbia University , New York, NY, USA
                [g ]Department of Neuroscience, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute , Columbia University , New York, NY, USA
                [h ]Department of Electrical Engineering, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute , Columbia University , New York, NY, USA
                [i ]Brain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, WE4 , Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [j ]School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [k ]Cluster of Excellence “Matters of Activity”, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [l ]Einstein Center for Neuroscience Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                Author notes
                [CONTACT ] Francesca Carota francesca.carota@ 123456mpi.nl Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics , Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6315-9858
                Article
                2232481
                10.1080/23273798.2023.2232481
                11706208
                39777206
                3f97913c-f94a-402f-8a6f-36b39b938903
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 9, Equations: 0, References: 117, Pages: 25, Words: 13098
                Categories
                Regular Article
                Research Article

                experiential semantics,symbol grounding,distributional statistics,language network,rsa,fmri

                Comments

                Comment on this article