9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development of a Nuclear Morphometric Signature for Prostate Cancer Risk in Negative Biopsies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Our objective was to develop and validate a multi-feature nuclear score based on image analysis of direct DNA staining, and to test its association with field effects and subsequent detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in benign biopsies.

          Methods

          Tissue sections from 39 prostatectomies were Feulgen-stained and digitally scanned (400×), providing maps of DNA content per pixel. PCa and benign epithelial nuclei were randomly selected for measurement of 52 basic morphometric features. Logistic regression models discriminating benign from PCa nuclei, and benign from malignant nuclear populations, were built and cross-validated by AUC analysis. Nuclear populations were randomly collected <1 mm or >5 mm from cancer foci, and from cancer-free prostates, HGPIN, and PCa Gleason grade 3–5. Nuclei also were collected from negative biopsy subjects who had a subsequent diagnosis of PCa and age-matched cancer-free controls (20 pairs).

          Results

          A multi-feature nuclear score discriminated cancer from benign cell populations with AUCs of 0.91 and 0.79, respectively, in training and validation sets of patients. In prostatectomy samples, both nuclear- and population-level models revealed cancer-like features in benign nuclei adjacent to PCa, compared to nuclei that were more distant or from PCa-free glands. In negative biopsies, a validated model with 5 variance features yielded significantly higher scores in cases than controls ( P = 0.026).

          Conclusions

          A multifeature nuclear morphometric score, obtained by automated digital analysis, was validated for discrimination of benign from cancer nuclei. This score demonstrated field effects in benign epithelial nuclei at varying distance from PCa lesions, and was associated with subsequent PCa detection in negative biopsies.

          Impact

          This nuclear score shows promise as a risk predictor among men with negative biopsies and as an intermediate biomarker in Phase II chemoprevention trials. The results also suggest that subvisual disturbances in nuclear structure precede the development of pre-neoplastic lesions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Role of the stromal microenvironment in carcinogenesis of the prostate.

          The topic of this review is the role of stromal-epithelial interactions in normal and malignant prostatic growth. Because cell-cell interactions and androgens play such key roles in the prostate, the goal of this review will be to apply endocrinologic and developmental concepts to the understanding of normal and malignant prostatic growth. Prostatic development is induced by androgens, which act via androgen receptors. Androgens elicit prostatic epithelial growth during fetal and prepubertal periods, and in adulthood androgens act via reciprocal homeostatic stromal-epithelial interactions to maintain functional differentiation and growth quiescence. During carcinogenesis, these reciprocal homeostatic stromal-epithelial interactions are disrupted. In this review, 2 models of prostatic carcinogenesis will be reviewed, both of which emphasize the role of the stromal microenvironment in the carcinogenic process. Hormonal carcinogenesis of the prostate can be elicited by treatment of rats and mice with testosterone plus estradiol (T+E2). Using an immortalized but nontumorigenic human prostatic epithelial cell line (BPH-1), tissue recombinant studies were employed to explore the cellular mechanisms of prostatic carcinogenesis. Accordingly, human BPH-1 prostatic epithelial cells were combined with rat UGM, and the resultant UGM+BPH-1 recombinants were grown in adult male nude mouse hosts. In untreated mouse hosts, UGM+BPH-1 recombinants produced solid branched epithelial cords and ductal structures exhibiting benign growth. In T+E2-treated hosts, UGM+BPH-1 recombinants formed invasive carcinomas. Since BPH-1 cells lack androgen and estrogen receptors, whereas rat UGM expresses both of these receptors, it is proposed that hormonal carcinogenesis is elicited by T+E2 via paracrine mechanisms mediated by the stromal microenvironment. During prostatic carcinogenesis in rats and humans, the periepithelial stroma undergoes progressive loss in smooth muscle with the appearance of carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). This abnormal stroma was shown to promote carcinogenesis in genetically abnormal but nontumorigenic epithelial cells. CAF+BPH-1 tissue recombinants grown in male hosts formed carcinomas, whereas benign growth and orderly tissue architecture developed in recombinants composed of normal prostatic stroma+BPH-1. Malignant transformation triggered by CAF was associated with additional genetic alterations and changes in gene expression in the BPH-1 cells. Thus, the stromal microenvironment is a critical determinant of benign versus malignant growth. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global levels of histone modifications predict prostate cancer recurrence.

            Epigenetic alterations such as DNA methylation and histone modifications play important roles in carcinogenesis. It was reported that global histone modification patterns are predictors of cancer recurrence in various tumor entities. Our study was performed to evaluate histone lysine (H(x)K(y)) and histone acetyl (H(x)Ac) modifications in prostate tissue. A tissue microarray with 113 prostate cancer (PCA), 23 non-malignant prostate tissues was stained with antibodies against H3K4 mono-(H3K4me1), di-(H3K4me2), tri-(H3K4me3) methylation, H3K9me1, H3K9me2, H3K9me3, H3 and H4 pan-acetylation (H3Ac, H4Ac). We also analyzed H3K4 methylation in patients with advanced PCA (hormone-refractory PCA-HRPC, n = 34; hormone-dependent PCA, n = 30). Sections were scored according the staining intensity and the proportion of epithelial cells showing nuclear staining. H3K4me1, H3K9me2, H3K9me3, H3Ac, and H4Ac were significantly reduced in PCA compared to non-malignant prostate tissue. H3Ac and H3K9me2 levels allowed discrimination of PCA and non-malignant prostate tissue highly specifically (>91%) and sensitively (>78%) as determined via ROC analyses (AUC >0.91). Histone lysine methylation and histone acetylation marks were correlated with clinical-pathological parameters (i.e., digital rectal examination, preoperative PSA, pT-stage, lymph node metastasis, Gleason score). In addition, H3K4me1 was a significant predictor of PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy. H3K4me1, H3K4me2, and H3K4me3 levels were significantly increased in HRPC. Global histone modification levels may help to identify patients with adverse prognosis, and represent a target for the future therapy of PCA. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Alterations in nucleolar structure and gene expression programs in prostatic neoplasia are driven by the MYC oncogene.

              Increased nucleolar size and number are hallmark features of many cancers. In prostate cancer, nucleolar enlargement and increased numbers are some of the earliest morphological changes associated with development of premalignant prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) lesions and invasive adenocarcinomas. However, the molecular mechanisms that induce nucleolar alterations in PIN and prostate cancer remain largely unknown. We verify that activation of the MYC oncogene, which is overexpressed in most human PIN and prostatic adenocarcinomas, leads to formation of enlarged nucleoli and increased nucleolar number in prostate luminal epithelial cells in vivo. In prostate cancer cells in vitro, MYC expression is needed for maintenance of nucleolar number, and a nucleolar program of gene expression. To begin to decipher the functional relevance of this transcriptional program in prostate cancer, we examined FBL (encoding fibrillarin), a MYC target gene, and report that fibrillarin is required for proliferation, clonogenic survival, and proper ribosomal RNA accumulation/processing in human prostate cancer cells. Further, fibrillarin is overexpressed in PIN lesions induced by MYC overexpression in the mouse prostate, and in human clinical prostate adenocarcinoma and PIN lesions, where its expression correlates with MYC levels. These studies demonstrate that overexpression of the MYC oncogene increases nucleolar number and size and a nucleolar program of gene expression in prostate epithelial cells, thus providing a molecular mechanism responsible for hallmark nucleolar alterations in prostatic neoplasia. Copyright © 2011 American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                26 July 2013
                : 8
                : 7
                : e69457
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States of America
                [3 ]College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
                [4 ]Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
                University of Camp'nas, Brazil
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: PHG RD VA. Performed the experiments: RD MM YY VA EER. Analyzed the data: PHG RD AA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MM YY. Wrote the paper: PHG AA VA. Acquired clinical samples and data: EER.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-39070
                10.1371/journal.pone.0069457
                3724855
                23922715
                3f955032-4357-479b-9739-0a542209914f
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 12 December 2012
                : 9 June 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute RO1 CA155301 and RO1 CA90759. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Engineering
                Signal Processing
                Image Processing
                Medicine
                Epidemiology
                Biomarker Epidemiology
                Cancer Epidemiology
                Oncology
                Cancer Detection and Diagnosis
                Early Detection
                Cancer Risk Factors
                Chemoprevention
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Genitourinary Tract Tumors
                Prostate Cancer
                Urology
                Prostate Diseases
                Prostate Cancer

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article