34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of First-Line Serplulimab vs Placebo Added to Chemotherapy on Survival in Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer : The ASTRUM-005 Randomized Clinical Trial

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 23 , 23 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 24 , ASTRUM-005 Study Group
      JAMA
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy has changed the approach to first-line treatment in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). It remained unknown whether adding a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor to chemotherapy provided similar or better benefits in patients with extensive-stage SCLC, which would add evidence on the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of extensive-stage SCLC.

          Objective

          To evaluate the efficacy and adverse event profile of the PD-1 inhibitor serplulimab plus chemotherapy compared with placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with extensive-stage SCLC.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This international, double-blind, phase 3 randomized clinical trial (ASTRUM-005) enrolled patients at 114 hospital sites in 6 countries between September 12, 2019, and April 27, 2021. Of 894 patients who were screened, 585 with extensive-stage SCLC who had not previously received systemic therapy were randomized. Patients were followed up through October 22, 2021.

          Interventions

          Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either 4.5 mg/kg of serplulimab (n = 389) or placebo (n = 196) intravenously every 3 weeks. All patients received intravenous carboplatin and etoposide every 3 weeks for up to 12 weeks.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcome was overall survival (prespecified significance threshold at the interim analysis, 2-sided P < .012). There were 13 secondary outcomes, including progression-free survival and adverse events.

          Results

          Among the 585 patients who were randomized (mean age, 61.1 [SD, 8.67] years; 104 [17.8%] women), 246 (42.1%) completed the trial and 465 (79.5%) discontinued study treatment. All patients received study treatment and were included in the primary analyses. As of the data cutoff (October 22, 2021) for this interim analysis, the median duration of follow-up was 12.3 months (range, 0.2-24.8 months). The median overall survival was significantly longer in the serplulimab group (15.4 months [95% CI, 13.3 months-not evaluable]) than in the placebo group (10.9 months [95% CI, 10.0-14.3 months]) (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.82]; P < .001). The median progression-free survival (assessed by an independent radiology review committee) also was longer in the serplulimab group (5.7 months [95% CI, 5.5-6.9 months]) than in the placebo group (4.3 months [95% CI, 4.2-4.5 months]) (hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.38-0.59]). Treatment-related adverse events that were grade 3 or higher occurred in 129 patients (33.2%) in the serplulimab group and in 54 patients (27.6%) in the placebo group.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Among patients with previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC, serplulimab plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone, supporting the use of serplulimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for this patient population.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04063163

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          First-Line Atezolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

          Enhancing tumor-specific T-cell immunity by inhibiting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-programmed death 1 (PD-1) signaling has shown promise in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Combining checkpoint inhibition with cytotoxic chemotherapy may have a synergistic effect and improve efficacy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Small-cell lung cancer

            Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents about 15% of all lung cancers and is marked by an exceptionally high proliferative rate, strong predilection for early metastasis and poor prognosis. SCLC is strongly associated with exposure to tobacco carcinogens. Most patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis, with only one-third having earlier-stage disease that is amenable to potentially curative multimodality therapy. Genomic profiling of SCLC reveals extensive chromosomal rearrangements and a high mutation burden, almost always including functional inactivation of the tumour suppressor genes TP53 and RB1. Analyses of both human SCLC and murine models have defined subtypes of disease based on the relative expression of dominant transcriptional regulators and have also revealed substantial intratumoural heterogeneity. Aspects of this heterogeneity have been implicated in tumour evolution, metastasis and acquired therapeutic resistance. Although clinical progress in SCLC treatment has been notoriously slow, a better understanding of the biology of disease has uncovered novel vulnerabilities that might be amenable to targeted therapeutic approaches. The recent introduction of immune checkpoint blockade into the treatment of patients with SCLC is offering new hope, with a small subset of patients deriving prolonged benefit. Strategies to direct targeted therapies to those patients who are most likely to respond and to extend the durable benefit of effective antitumour immunity to a greater fraction of patients are urgently needed and are now being actively explored.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Etoposide and Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III KEYNOTE-604 Study

              Pembrolizumab monotherapy has shown antitumor activity in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-604 study compared pembrolizumab plus etoposide and platinum (EP) with placebo plus EP for patients with previously untreated extensive-stage (ES) SCLC. Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or saline placebo for up to 35 cycles plus 4 cycles of EP. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST version 1.1, blinded central review) and overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response were secondary end points. Prespecified efficacy boundaries were one-sided P = .0048 for PFS and .0128 for OS. Of the 453 participants, 228 were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus EP and 225 to placebo plus EP. Pembrolizumab plus EP significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.91; P = .0023). Twelve-month PFS estimates were 13.6% with pembrolizumab plus EP and 3.1% with placebo plus EP. Although pembrolizumab plus EP prolonged OS, the significance threshold was not met (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98; P = .0164). Twenty-four-month OS estimates were 22.5% and 11.2%, respectively. ORR was 70.6% in the pembrolizumab plus EP group and 61.8% in the placebo plus EP group; the estimated proportion of responders remaining in response at 12 months was 19.3% and 3.3%, respectively. In the pembrolizumab plus EP and placebo plus EP groups, respectively, any-cause adverse events were grade 3-4 in 76.7% and 74.9%, grade 5 in 6.3% and 5.4%, and led to discontinuation of any drug in 14.8% and 6.3%. Pembrolizumab plus EP significantly improved PFS compared with placebo plus EP as first-line therapy for patients with ES-SCLC. No unexpected toxicities were seen with pembrolizumab plus EP. These data support the benefit of pembrolizumab in ES-SCLC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA
                JAMA
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                0098-7484
                September 27 2022
                September 27 2022
                : 328
                : 12
                : 1223
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Oncology, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun, China
                [2 ]Department of Oncology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China
                [3 ]Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
                [4 ]Department of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
                [5 ]Department of Oncology, Jiamusi Cancer Hospital, Jiamusi, China
                [6 ]Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
                [7 ]Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China
                [8 ]Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Omsk Region Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia
                [9 ]Department of Oncology, Linyi Cancer Hospital, Linyi, China
                [10 ]Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
                [11 ]Department of Oncology, Cangzhou People’s Hospital, Changchun, China
                [12 ]Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
                [13 ]Department of Oncology and Hematology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
                [14 ]Academician Fridon Todua Medical Center–Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, Georgia
                [15 ]Department of Oncology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
                [16 ]Department of Interventional Radiology, Anhui Chest Hospital, Hefei, China
                [17 ]Clinical Research Department, Medical Center Mriya Med-Service, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine
                [18 ]Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
                [19 ]Department of Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
                [20 ]Department of Oncology, Tangshan People’s Hospital, Tangshan, China
                [21 ]Department of Oncology-Endocrinology, High Technology Hospital MedCenter LTD, Batumi, Georgia
                [22 ]LTD Israeli-Georgian Medical Research Clinic Helsicore, Tbilisi, Georgia
                [23 ]Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc, Shanghai, China
                [24 ]for the ASTRUM-005 Study Group
                Article
                10.1001/jama.2022.16464
                36166026
                3f2667b8-9fa5-42c8-9bfa-ba457de39750
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article