11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessing the Economic and Societal Benefits of SRP-Funded Research

      case-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Superfund Basic Research and Training Program (SRP) funds a wide range of transdisciplinary research projects spanning the biomedical and environmental sciences and engineering, supporting and promoting the application of that research to solving real-world problems.

          Objectives:

          We used a case study approach to identify the economic and societal benefits of SRP-funded research, focusing on the use of potentially hazardous substance remediation and site monitoring tools. We also identified successes and challenges involved in translating SRP grantees’ research findings and advances into application.

          Discussion:

          We identified remediation and detection research projects supported by the SRP with the most potential for economic and societal benefits and selected 36 for analysis. To examine the benefits of these applied technologies, we interviewed 28 SRP-supported researchers and 41 partners. Five case studies emerged with the most complete information on cost savings—total savings estimated at > $ 100 million . Our analysis identified added societal benefits such as creation of small businesses, land and water reuse, sustainable technologies, exposure reduction, and university–industry partnerships.

          Conclusions:

          Research funded by the SRP has yielded significant cost savings while providing additional societal benefits. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3534

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cost–benefit calculation of phytoremediation technology for heavy-metal-contaminated soil

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              In-situ Sorbent Amendments: A New Direction in Contaminated Sediment Management

              The accumulation of harmful and persistent organic molecules in soils and sediment is a major environmental concern. Removal by physical means such as riverine, lacustrine, or marine dredging can be prohibitively difficult, expensive, and may not ultimately prove effective. An alternative is to locally change the geochemistry to stabilize and sequester the contaminants and render them biologically unavailable. Ghosh et al. report on pilot projects to determine whether activated carbon would be so useful. Their Feature concludes with what more needs to be done to minimize anthropogenic chemical blights in soil and sediments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environ Health Perspect
                Environ. Health Perspect
                EHP
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                0091-6765
                1552-9924
                15 June 2018
                June 2018
                : 126
                : 6
                : 065002
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Superfund Research Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH) , Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
                [ 2 ]MDB, Inc. , Durham, North Carolina, USA
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to W.A. Suk, P.O. Box 12233, Mail Drop K3-04, Durham, N.C. 27709. Telephone: 984-287-3325. Email: suk@ 123456niehs.nih.gov
                Article
                EHP3534
                10.1289/EHP3534
                6108577
                29916809
                3eca7bc5-9acf-437b-a6ad-ea04a15983d2

                EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted.

                History
                : 20 February 2018
                : 17 April 2018
                : 24 April 2018
                Categories
                Commentary

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article