Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en salud pública: las precariedades del exceso Translated title: Communication and Information Technologies in Public Health: Excess and its Scarcities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Se discuten críticamente los posibles efectos secundarios del uso actual de las tecnologías de información y comunicación en salud y sus implicaciones para la teoría y la práctica de la Salud Pública. Para ello se invoca la idea de exceso y su precariedad bajo las perspectivas sociológicas de Ellul, Illich y Bauman, como una manera de observar las transformaciones provocadas por el uso en general de objetos técnicos y las estrategias de comunicación. En particular, se considera el rol del periodismo científico en la difusión de contenidos sobre biotecnología. Por otro lado se mencionan propuestas de desarrollo de pautas para reglamentar esta actividad. Además, bajo el concepto de framing, se presentan dimensiones persuasivas relevantes que pueden interferir en las prácticas modernas de comunicación en salud. En virtud de las implicaciones de otros aspectos en el ámbito de las precariedades de los excesos en la Salud Pública, como en el caso de la nutrición o las enfermedades emergentes se enfatiza el rol de los salubristas en estudiar las cuestiones de salud desde esta perspectiva como quizás una de las maneras de contribuir a una epidemiología global.

          Translated abstract

          A critique of the possible side-effects of the current use of communications and information technologies in health and the implications thereof for Public Health theory and practice. The idea of excess and it scarcities is invoked from the sociological perspectives of Ellul, Illich and Bauman, as a way of monitoring the changes wrought by the general use of technical objects and the communication strategies. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of scientific journalism in the dissemination of biotechnology-related subject matter. Some suggestions are also made for setting out guidelines for regulating this activity. Additionally, under the heading of framing, relevant persuasive dimensions are presented which may interfere with the modern communication-related practices in health. By virtue of the involvement of other aspects within the scope of excess and its scarcities in Public Health, such as in the case of nutrition or the emerging diseases, emphasis is placed on the role played by public health specialists in studying health-related matters from this viewpoint as perhaps one of the ways of contributing toward a global epidemiology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Promotional metaphors and their popular appeal

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Implementing the Stockholm Treaty on Persistent Organic Pollutants.

              M Porta (2002)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                resp
                Revista Española de Salud Pública
                Rev. Esp. Salud Publica
                Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar social (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                1135-5727
                2173-9110
                June 2005
                : 79
                : 3
                : 331-337
                Affiliations
                [02] orgnameUniversidad de Alicante orgdiv1Departamento de Salud Pública
                [01] Rio de Janeiro orgnameFundação Oswaldo Cruz orgdiv1Escola Nacional de Saude Publica orgdiv2Departamento de Epidemiología Brasil
                Article
                S1135-57272005000300002 S1135-5727(05)07900300002
                10.1590/s1135-57272005000300002
                28272382
                3eaa9470-bc7e-49d0-8666-8a6b447bbbd9

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 International License.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 26, Pages: 7
                Product

                SciELO Public Health

                Categories
                Colaboraciones Especiales

                Difusión de Innovaciones,Salud pública,Comunicación,Diseminación de la información,Comunicación social,Medios de Comunicación,Redes de comunicación de computadores,Información al Consumidor,Periodismo médico,Internet,Information dissemination,Communication,Communications media,Social communication,Medical journalism,Diffusion of innovation,Computer communication Networks,Public health,Popular works

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content1,020

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors73