10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for the malignant left atrial appendage: European Heart Rhythm Association physician survey

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Patients with atrial fibrillation who despite taking oral anti-coagulant therapy (OAT) suffer a stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) without vascular cause or who develop left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus (LAAT) should be considered as having malignant LAA. The optimal treatment strategy to reduce SSE risk in such patients is unknown. The aim of the study is to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for malignant LAA practiced in European cardiac centres.

          Methods and results

          An 18-item online questionnaire on malignant LAA was disseminated by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Scientific Initiatives Committee. A total of 196 physicians participated in the survey. There seems to be high confidence in transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging, considering LAAT diagnosis. Switching to another direct oral anti-coagulant (DOAC) is the preferred initial step for the treatment of malignant LAA followed by a switch to vitamin K antagonist (VKA), low-molecular-weight heparin, or continued/optimized DOAC dosage, whereas LAA closure is the last option. Left atrial appendage closure is a viable option in patients with embolic stroke despite OAT and no evidence of thrombus at TEE (empty LAA) after comprehensive diagnostic measures to exclude other sources of embolism.

          Conclusion

          This EHRA survey provides a snapshot of the contemporary management of patients diagnosed with malignant LAA. Currently, the majority of patients are treated on an outpatient basis with either shifting from VKA to DOAC or from one DOAC to another. Left atrial appendage closure in this population seems to be reserved for patients with higher bleeding risk or complications of malignant LAA, such as stroke.

          Graphical Abstract

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          OUP accepted manuscript

          (2020)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

            Vitamin K antagonists are highly effective in preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but have several limitations. Apixaban is a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in a similar population in comparison with aspirin. In this randomized, double-blind trial, we compared apixaban (at a dose of 5 mg twice daily) with warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) in 18,201 patients with atrial fibrillation and at least one additional risk factor for stroke. The primary outcome was ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. The trial was designed to test for noninferiority, with key secondary objectives of testing for superiority with respect to the primary outcome and to the rates of major bleeding and death from any cause. The median duration of follow-up was 1.8 years. The rate of the primary outcome was 1.27% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 1.60% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio with apixaban, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.01 for superiority). The rate of major bleeding was 2.13% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 3.09% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.80; P<0.001), and the rates of death from any cause were 3.52% and 3.94%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.99; P=0.047). The rate of hemorrhagic stroke was 0.24% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 0.47% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.75; P<0.001), and the rate of ischemic or uncertain type of stroke was 0.97% per year in the apixaban group and 1.05% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.13; P=0.42). In patients with atrial fibrillation, apixaban was superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, caused less bleeding, and resulted in lower mortality. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; ARISTOTLE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00412984.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

              The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin. In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism. In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group. In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Europace
                Europace
                europace
                Europace
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1099-5129
                1532-2092
                July 2023
                13 July 2023
                13 July 2023
                : 25
                : 7
                : euad204
                Affiliations
                Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Centre Split , Soltanska 1, 21000 Split, Croatia
                Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Centre Split , Soltanska 1, 21000 Split, Croatia
                School of Medicine, University of Split , Split, Croatia
                Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Centre Split , Soltanska 1, 21000 Split, Croatia
                School of Medicine, University of Split , Split, Croatia
                Department of Cardiology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration , Warsaw, Poland
                II Department of Heart Arrhythmia, National Institute of Cardiology , Warsaw, Poland
                Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Centre Split , Soltanska 1, 21000 Split, Croatia
                Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Centre Split , Soltanska 1, 21000 Split, Croatia
                School of Medicine, University of Split , Split, Croatia
                Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus, Denmark
                University Hospital Careggi, EP Lab , Florence, Italy
                Heart Rhythm Management Centre, University Hospital (UZ) Brussels , Brussels, Belgium
                Cardiology-Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur , Toulouse, France
                CCB, Cardiology, Med. Klinik III, Markus Krankenhaus , Frankfurt, Germany
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. Tel: +38521557531. E-mail address: anteanic@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6864-3999
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6751-5242
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7583-9036
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1673-7712
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-0259
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7266-2087
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6473-2900
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4322-1183
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9351-0760
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-7042
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-6015
                Article
                euad204
                10.1093/europace/euad204
                10359107
                37440757
                3e079835-6c65-4d48-86ba-9573e3406cd6
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 17 January 2023
                : 29 May 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Categories
                EHRA Survey
                AcademicSubjects/MED00200
                Eurheartj/39
                Eurheartj/41
                Eurheartj/1
                Eurheartj/3

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                left atrial appendage thrombus,stroke,oral anti-coagulant therapy,left atrial appendage closure,malignant left atrial appendage,ehra survey

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content367

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors1,495