1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Truth in Memory: Ramifications for Psychotherapy and Hypnotherapy

      ,
      American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The reality of repressed memories.

            E Loftus (1993)
            Repression is one of the most haunting concepts in psychology. Something shocking happens, and the mind pushes it into some inaccessible corner of the unconscious. Later, the memory may emerge into consciousness. Repression is one of the foundation stones on which the structure of psychoanalysis rests. Recently there has been a rise in reported memories of childhood sexual abuse that were allegedly repressed for many years. With recent changes in legislation, people with recently unearthed memories are suing alleged perpetrators for events that happened 20, 30, even 40 or more years earlier. These new developments give rise to a number of questions: (a) How common is it for memories of child abuse to be repressed? (b) How are jurors and judges likely to react to these repressed memory claims? (c) When the memories surface, what are they like? and (d) How authentic are the memories?
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Misleading postevent information and memory for events: arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses.

              The claim that a person's memory for an event may be altered by information encountered after the event has been influential in shaping current conceptions of memory. The basis for the claim is a series of studies showing that subjects who are given false or misleading information about a previously witnessed event perform more poorly on tests of memory for the event than subjects who are not misled. In this article we argue that the available evidence does not imply that misleading postevent information impairs memory for the original event, because the procedure used in previous studies is inappropriate for assessing effects of misleading information on memory. We then introduce a more appropriate procedure and report six experiments using this procedure. We conclude from the results that misleading postevent information has no effect on memory for the original event. We then review several recent studies that seem to contradict this conclusion, showing that the studies do not pose problems for our position. Finally, we discuss the implications of our conclusions for broader issues concerning memory.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis
                American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis
                Informa UK Limited
                0002-9157
                2160-0562
                January 1994
                January 1994
                : 36
                : 3
                : 194-208
                Article
                10.1080/00029157.1994.10403069
                3dfbb7c6-682c-46e4-bdef-477e35ce34bf
                © 1994
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article